Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brian Harpole - Groundbreaking Evidence From Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security | SRS #254
Youtube ^ | 11 18 2025 | Shawn Ryan

Posted on 11/18/2025 2:27:30 AM PST by cuz1961

Brian Harpole served as a police officer in Texas for 14 years, holding a variety of assignments including patrol, tactical operations, criminal and narcotics interdiction, bicycle unit, training, and administration. Over the course of his law enforcement career, he received more than 25 commendations recognizing Valor, Meritorious Service, Meritorious Conduct, Lifesaving, and Officer of the Year honors. In 2008, Brian transitioned to the private sector as the Operations Manager for an elite Texas-based security firm. In this role, he specialized in executive and personal protection for dignitaries, their families, and high-value assets, overseeing complex security operations across diverse environments. Today, Brian continues to work globally as a private security contractor and trainer for non-governmental organizations through his company Integrity Security Solutions. His work has taken him to five continents, where he provides specialized training and operational support in protective services, intelligence, and emergency responses.

An honors graduate of Columbia College, Brian also earned a Master Peace Officer License from the State of Texas and is a graduate of both the International Law Enforcement School of Police Supervision and Southern Methodist University’s CAPE Intelligence Program. He has completed more than 4,400 hours of advanced instruction in law enforcement and executive protection practices.

Beyond his professional achievements, Brian won over twenty medals in the Police Olympics and has completed more than 325 endurance events across the United States.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: armchairdetectives; banglist; brianharpole; charliekirk; clickbait; garbage; kirk; reasonisfaith; reasonisntfaith; reasonisntnuts; resume
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last
To: cuz1961

FreeRepublic has a long-established tradition of allowing for posters to provide a summary of lengthy and tiring articles and interviews.

The ability to reduce an interview to its essentials is the sign of careful and accurate thinking.

An interview like this would typically produce no more than two or three sentences of actual substance.


101 posted on 11/22/2025 2:01:59 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

If it came from the front, and then went down into his body, that’s about a 90 degree change in trajectory.

It could be there’s something I’m missing.


We do not know the trajectory of the bullet. The entrance wound is in the front of the neck. It had a somewhat downward trajectory from the roof. It appeared Charlie was somewhat leaning toward the direction of the assassin. We do not know the orientation of Charlie’s spine to the trajectory.

The answer to all the trajectory and bullet questions are in the autopsy.

The person who witnessed the autopsy said the bullet fragmented on Charlie’s spine.

I would like to see the autopsy. For whatever reasons, perhaps because of legal constraints (autopsies are often not released until during a trial), the autopsy has not been released.

Rare events often occur when a number of unlikely things happen to line up.


102 posted on 11/22/2025 2:03:35 PM PST by marktwain (----------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I’m a big fan of the 40,000 foot view. Better described as the 107,000 foot view.

The most important determining factor in any uncertainty or set of uncertainties is the first premise.

Historically, the initial premise has always been to assume the establishment is honest and has our best interests in mind.

But in this age of the great awakening, the best initial premise is to assume the mainstream media and the establishment are lying to us to cover their crimes.

I think many haven’t fully awakened.


103 posted on 11/22/2025 2:09:27 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Again, there was no mention of the camera above and behind Charlie as a device that fired a .22 long rifle bullet.


I fail to see why there would be such a discussion. If the security chief saw the autopsy and the internal destruction as described, such a device would not be needed to explain anything. Synchronizing a high powered rifle shot with such a devise would be rather difficult, (not impossible) and to what purpose? The damage from a .22 LR is enormously different than from a .30-06.


104 posted on 11/22/2025 2:10:16 PM PST by marktwain (----------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

But in this age of the great awakening, the best initial premise is to assume the mainstream media and the establishment are lying to us to cover their crimes.


I think rational skepticism is a good thing.

I am rationally skeptical about the ability of the Deep State and the Old, formerly dominant media to hold together multiple conspiracies.


105 posted on 11/22/2025 2:13:11 PM PST by marktwain (----------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“If the security chief saw the autopsy”

Do we automatically trust the security chief?

Like we trusted Secret Service when JFK was assassinated?


106 posted on 11/22/2025 2:13:14 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

This is an IQ test.


107 posted on 11/22/2025 2:13:40 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

It takes another level of conspiracy to distrust the security chief.

Charlie Kirk trusted him. I do not see any strong evidence to cause me to distrust him. The “evidence” to distrust him appears to me to rest on layer after layer of unproven, dubious assertions. YMMV.

Not impossible, but requiring considerable complicated explanations, when a relatively simple explanation will serve as well.


108 posted on 11/22/2025 2:17:07 PM PST by marktwain (----------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson