Posted on 11/15/2025 7:25:53 AM PST by Taxman
A woman in her late thirties posts a simple complaint online: “Men can have kids into their seventies. I’ve only got a few years left. That’s so unfair.”
Within hours, her mentions are a war zone. Some men sneer about “geriatric eggs.” Others write manifestos about feminism and hypergamy. A few women defend her, but the thread collapses into the same argument we’ve been having for decades.
In Britain, a thirty-four-year-old woman recently sued her ex-boyfriend, claiming he had “stolen her childbearing years.” After ten years together, he ended the relationship without fulfilling his promises of marriage and children. Now, she’s demanding enough compensation to pay for in vitro fertilization, arguing that at her age, the damage is irreversible. The story, which may or may not be apocryphal, made international headlines (New York Post, Nov. 9, 2025).
None of this is about fairness. It’s about biology.
Both scenes expose the same raw truth: the difference between men and women starts in the body. Women face a narrow reproductive window and carry the heavier cost of sex and childbearing. Men can father children for decades and are built to compete for access. That single asymmetry — who can bear life, and when — shapes everything that follows.
Feminism can deny it, but it can’t erase it. The entire struggle between men and women — resentment, rivalry, dependency, love — traces back to unyielding biological facts.
Biology and the Social Machinery
Men and women were never designed for identical roles. Men are stronger and more expendable. Women are fertile for a brief span and pay a higher price for reproduction. Left unmanaged, that imbalance leads to chaos: predation, jealousy, neglect. Civilizations that survived learned to harness male aggression into protection and tie sexual access to responsibility.
That is where social machinery began.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
The author and many others find it convenient to blame men and women while ignoring the government controlling the covenant between husband and wife.
Actually it was the pill. That led to women giving away one of the things men want most from women - what’s between their legs - for free or a cup at Starbucks.
The rest of the story is easily discernable from that simple fact.
Technology is the biggest disrupter of culture and society.
Today it’s the internet and smart phone.
Tomorrow it’ll be AI.
LOL, if only it were that simple, it isn’t close to being that simple, the pill was a contributing factor but not the simple explanation for feminism, and the women’s movement(s).
LOL!
We were FRiends in High School but never dated.
We have asked each other that question, and have concluded that “Back in the Day,” we weren’t compatible.
Our separate life experiences caused us to become attracted to one another at our High School 35th Class Reunion.
We were FRiends, again, for 10 years before we got married.
So far, so good!
Unfairness?
Men die before women because want to ....
They can talk forever without saying nothing
Men can say nothing forever and that conversation with another man can lead to greater understanding, collaboration and be fulfilling like few conversations will ever be.
Men go to work and all day long they make fun of each other....they dont mean it.
Women go to work and pass the time all day long telling each other how beautiful they are....they don’t mean it either...
“Cuckoldry is so prevalent that paternity testing is illegal in entire countries, and many places require a man known to not be the father pay child support.”
Unpossible. We all know slavery is illegal!!
Point taken and conceded.
HST, WE ARE responsible for what government does to us, and if the government screws up, it is up to us to fix it!
Make take some time, talents and money, but it can be done!
She is a smart, attractive lady.
This is the first article of hers I have read; there are others at her website I’ll want to read later.
Imagine a running car is in neutral, on a hill, facing a cliff. The only thing keeping it from going over the cliff is the emergency brake.
One day the brake fails and the car goes over the cliff. Is it the fault of the brake? Or the idiot who left it running, facing a cliff?
If you take children out of the equation, it's not a very important development. I would posit that a woman who wants children had better be very careful about feminism and sexual freedom. But those who don't want them have not been injured by these developments.
Two me there are four types of people, at least in this regard: men who want families, and men who don't, and women who want families, and women who don't. As long as those who want families find each other, everything is fine. It's those chasing after the wrong sort who end up in a pickle.
Human nature doesn't change. What happened is that women finally escaped what was essentially biological and cultural slavery. Hey, look over at fundamentalist Islam. They're still doing things the good old fashioned way. It's funny, we see how draconian it is when the women have a chador on, but when we look back and see her in a corset and hoop skirts, we think it was paradise.
That means they’re underwater by 95% on the hardware alone.
The pill gave the feminists the ability to push for more sexual promiscuity, and brainwashed women to think that if men can be studs then women now can be sluts - with no price to pay.
But that has resulted in millions of women being alone, childless and miserable.
Of course that didn’t help men either. The free sex made them less responsible and less likely to commit to a long term relationship.
Absurd!
While in their sexual prime, the majority of women can do whatever they want. They can surrender themselves to complete sexual debauchery, if they like. During that (admittedly) short period of their life, they are the ones who have all the sexual leverage (now that they have the means to hormonally control ovulation). Unconstrained by biology, and unsanctioned by a libertine society, they can do whatever they want in the bedroom. And they are praised for it!
Men are "horndogs." They have always been horndogs. As T.B. Yoits pointed out above, that is the one, unchanging constant in all these developments. It hence follows that male sexuality has steered none of these unwholesome developments of the past ca. 60 years.
And despite being horndogs, (average) heterosexual men cannot simply abandon themselves to debauchery and live out their fantasies. For an average man, it requires a lot of investment (in time and effort) to bed lots of women. For even a below-average woman, on the other hand, it requires little to no effort - heck, she'll probably even get a free meal out of it!
Regards,
Tell that to Tom Brady!
Regards,
And there are cans marked "RAT POISON! POISONOUS! DO NOT INGEST!" out there that, in reality, happen to contain sugar.
Sure, they're rare - but you young men keep opening them up and tasting them! You're bound to get it right - eventually!
Regards,
We’ve all heard of the pill, it isn’t the end all that frequently gets posted here, read some history about the progression of the left and radical females, women’s movements, of the last 150 years or so, the pill was a contributing factor, not what caused everything.
It’s hard, if not impossible, to argue with a thing she says here. Thank you for posting this, Taxman. People need to read it.
PS
Good to “see” you. I miss our old gang who creeped Code Pink at WR!
“””””Human nature doesn’t change.”””””
True Valerie Solanas, but an all powerful government and the female vote can temporarily overcome human nature and the natural state, as we have learned during this 60 year collapse of the family, society, America, and Western Civilization that we have witnessed since the left and government took control of females.
Marriage became centered on personal happiness rather than duty or necessity, and legal or social supports for women eroded.When, in Human History, have unmarried women with multiple children from multiple "baby-daddies" ever enjoyed as much social approval and govt. support?
When, in Human History, have promiscuous women suffered so little social stigma?
When, in Human History, have women filing for divorce been so privileged by the Law?
When, in Human History, have women previously been so able to enter the public forum (daytime t.v. or the earlier equivalent) and shout to the heavens how abortion is a "right" or a "holy sacrament?"
When, in all of Human History, has society been expected to actually pay for a woman's birth control or abortions?
The unsavory developments of the past 50 years have benefited 85% of all women, and at most 15% of all men (and generally only the most reprobate of all men).
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.