Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/30/2025 6:04:15 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 04-Bravo; 1FASTGLOCK45; 1stFreedom; 2ndDivisionVet; 2sheds; 60Gunner; 6AL-4V; A.A. Cunningham; ...

Aviation Ping!......................


2 posted on 09/30/2025 6:04:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

maybe the replacement will have the possibility to glide to the ground in the event of total engine failure instead of just nose-diving like the 737 Max ...


3 posted on 09/30/2025 6:08:48 AM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

They need to explain how they have totally revamped their engineering and quality control divisions before I will hold out hope for the new model.


4 posted on 09/30/2025 6:10:56 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

737 platform began in 1967. It might be past the point for updates.


5 posted on 09/30/2025 6:15:55 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

737 platform began in 1967. It might be past the point for updates.


6 posted on 09/30/2025 6:15:55 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

737 platform began in 1967. It might be past the point for updates.


7 posted on 09/30/2025 6:15:55 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

H1B Indians wrote the 737 MAX software.


11 posted on 09/30/2025 6:35:38 AM PDT by jroehl (And how we burned in the camps later - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - The Gulag Archipelago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; All

Yeah, Boeing rode that “type rating” train long enough...time to get rid of that spinning trim wheel!!


13 posted on 09/30/2025 6:40:01 AM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

They should name the replacement “737 MAX DIVERSITY.”


17 posted on 09/30/2025 6:53:26 AM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
The Max is a great airplane - if the pilot knows how to fly it. I have a friend whose brother is a Max pilot. He says he had two incidents where the 'problem' happened. He simply reached over and flipped a switch.

Of course, he knew which switch to flip, and where it was located. That only was possible with hours and hours of training and in simulators. If he had to open up the manual and then search for the symptoms, it would have been all over for the airplane and crew.

19 posted on 09/30/2025 7:15:29 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Freud: projection is a defense mechanism of those [Leftists] struggling with inferiority complexes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; All
The new single-aisle airplane Boeing is developing to replace the 737 MAX is a clean sheet of paper design. This means it's being built from the ground up as an all-new aircraft, rather than a derivative or updated version of the existing 737 family. This marks Boeing's first clean-sheet commercial aircraft in over two decades, since the 787 Dreamliner.

t's positioned as a long-term response to competition from Airbus's A320neo family. While details like timelines and costs (potentially tens of billions over a decade) are still emerging, the focus is on incorporating modern technologies for better efficiency and addressing past 737 MAX challenges. No sources indicate it's a 737 derivative.

I find it a bit ironic because the MAX design was created to compete with that Airbus model. As T.B. Yoits wrote, Boeing decided to add high bypass engines but could not get the needed ground clearance without an airframe redesign. So they shoved the engines forward and compensated with software. That's what led to the two fatal crashes in 2019. So Boeing is finally going to discard that kludge concept and go with a clean sheet of paper design.

21 posted on 09/30/2025 7:19:38 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

It should replace both 737 and 757. One 7 across narrow body of varying lengths and two engine/wing/box sets for short or long haul. It should be modular for future configurations.


26 posted on 09/30/2025 8:03:07 AM PDT by IDFbunny (Crimea was never Ukraine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Boeing is in the early stages of developing a new single-aisle airplane that would eventually replace the 737 MAX...

A good choice, even if it's 10 years late.
Hope their engineers do a better job this time...

29 posted on 09/30/2025 10:49:46 AM PDT by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
The exact same 737 MAX flew more than 40,000 flights in the USA, Europe, Japan, and Aus-NZ.

Not even one Incident Report was filed about the allegedly deadly auto-pilot software.

Two crashes.

Four Muslim pilots.

31 posted on 09/30/2025 12:20:24 PM PDT by zeestephen (Trump Landslide? Kamala lost the election by 230,000 votes, in WI, MI, and PA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson