Marcuse temporarily arresting the attention of young people— many of whom discovered his lies and achieved clearer thinking through open discussion
Posted on 09/20/2025 9:56:23 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell
President Kennedy made a famous remark about freedom of thought and speech which will end this note. The people who use the Charlie Kirk as an object of hatred, probably, mostly know near to nothing about the opinions and issues he talked about, and listened to, and himself learned from, with people of a wide variety of viewpoints. I don’t know most of what he said, either, but I do know that the Jimmy Kimmels are polluting the air with nonsense, which people will ultimately see through once they work through it, nonsense that secretly is aimed at quashing debate and free thought flow. (So I think it was a bad mistake to fire Kimmel, because no one was listening to him anyway, so let him rave on with his pathetic, irrelevant outbursts.)
To accurately see a thing, a set of issues and circumstances, even if you don’t have to wear glasses, you still need to attain a specific vantage point and focus; for even with 2020 vision, the eyes themselves are still optical instruments that work best for their purpose—seeing—in a definite way.
Opposition to seeing and talking about actual reality, was what the cultural communist propagandist and spy Herbert Marcuse formalized as partisan “Repressive Tolerance”. You already know all about this, you’ve seen it in hundreds of instances over many decades: Only a certain viewpoint is allowed, they’ll get modern storm troopers like Antifa not only to shout down any discourse but to bloody the heads of people who just want to talk.
Marcuse temporarily arresting the attention of young people— many of whom discovered his lies and achieved clearer thinking through open discussion
The most disabled thinking and feeling people, have been systematically, not accidentally, abused by ruthless systems designed to exploit them for evil purposes. (Isn’t “evil” a rather strong word? Evil disguises itself, with the help of “educational” conditioning that makes many people regard it as a “not nice” thing to look that evil in the face.)
Take the most violent single political group, transsexuals. I know about them because of I have grandchildren who are locked into it, and who make death threats.
Their radicalization proceeds in several distinct phases: First, they were molested, something that was once much rarer, though never entirely absent, but that is now a tsunami.
Then they were groomed within the schools—in a counselor’s office there was prominently displayed, an autobiographical drawing of a naked woman showing her private girl parts.
Then as was shown with the Minnesota School-Church shooter, just several weeks ago, the last stage before violence is having been doped and chopped up by “doctors” for money, which makes their rage permanent.
All this is predicated on neglect and isolation—if they were abused by family or teachers, the first thing is to ensure their isolation—"if you tell anyone, I’ll hurt your puppy or little sister or brother". The evil, evil people know they can only operate in secret, by getting the victims alone.
It is the quashing of free communication that Kimmel and all the other murder martyrs have been taught to promote.
President John F. Kennedy focused in on the essential issue, real freedom of thought and speech which murder-martyr Kimmel really opposes:
We seek a free flow of information across national boundaries and oceans, across iron curtains and stone walls. We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.
We won’t permanently prevail in opposing the murder-martyrs by suppressing them. The pendulum will swing back the other way. Don’t forget how strong was the control held by the evil-lovers just 5 years ago, from Antifa’s free summer of rampage, to the Fed setup of January 6, 2021.
They will be back. The lies are only dormant. It takes courage and listening to other points of view, to be able to communicate that portion of the truth that you have.
At a loss of $40 million a year. Not a wise business model.
It seems that everyone is missing the elephant in the room.
Good post.
The United States Agency for International Development, USAID, was funding a lot of things they didn’t tell us about. Like talk shows.
It was part of the shell game.
Trump has killed much of the funding, and when the dust settles, it will be easier to see that we’ve been freed from these evil agencies of mind control.
I’m a first amendment soldier.
However, folks using the argument that actions taken today will somehow lead to unrestrained persecution by the left “when the pendulum swings” must have been in a coma over the last ten years.
No matter what conservative administrations do, if/when the left retakes power, they will use every government entity available to harass and persecute their perceived political enemies.
“At a loss of $40 million a year. Not a wise business model.”
You’re right.
Unfortunately, if you tell a lie often enough...
Agreed. Without familiarity with the argument upon false premises it is difficult to repose effectively. In fact, that rejoinder must be built upon an inviolable and immediately obvious physical foundation. It's why I appreciate living among leftists in the People's Republic of Santa Cruz County, CA.
Yet in the face of such evidence, the response is likely to be either denial, obvious dishonesty, or simple avoidance because they suffer from the fear of retribution by even more ignorant fellows. This is where repetition in the face of empty space becomes necessary, and a real expression of courage. Sometimes events present an opportunity to get under that skin. At that point one must leap, but not too hard, with which to build upon those repetitions.
It's a long slog we face.
I at first thought No don’t fire him leave the jerk on the air....
But his whiny entitlement has changed my mind....
We’re all equal under the law...
So why is he entitled to that network platform and all that money for his free speech while the rest of us aren’t..
His free speech is no more special than any of us and he deserves the same platform the rest of us have Just being another person out here on the internet... He’s not entitled to that network platform any more than the rest of us are
(Carry Okie: What’s your favorite song?)
Pat Buchanan told a story. When Nixon & Kissinger were going to Beijing, Nixon’s press secretary Ron Ziegler was asked by a reporter on the jet, “Have you ever been to a communist country?”
“No, but I’ve been to Massachusetts”.
“Not a wise business model.”
So they make the decision years after they should have so the MSM will be able to provide cover by blaming Trump’s FTC.
Embryonic Journey.
Tophat9000
Why should Kimmel get that platform when the rest of us don’t?
There’s common advice, “get off the phone, go out with the trees”.
Out there, we’ll meet the people we can really influence and learn from.
That’s the only thing that matters. Most people’s social media just degrades their thinking.
And Kimmel is one of the PressTiTutes who pay an awful price for their influence.
Imagine Kimmel alone and dying.
>They found that Presidents are not.
Provided that, as you noted in your post, the President did not authorize and did not know (so as not to be able to issue a countermand) about the misdeed.
or, more cynically, plausible deniability.
I would submit that Obama was quite aware of and ordered a number of illegal actions for which he’s liable, including many taken after his tenure as President and acted upon by remaining members of the executive branch. Plausible deniability falls apart when people have your emails and recordings of you telling them to do things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.