Posted on 09/16/2025 11:22:34 AM PDT by Miami Rebel
Walsh is right. I don’t think Charlie Kirk would support the government controlling the speech of any company for any reason. He was against the colleges and the government controlling his speech and if he were running a college or in the government he would not ban his opponents speech.
Which instance are you talking about?
Two Things:
(1) Either Bondi is a Moron
(2) Or she thinks we’re Morons
Prosecuting so-called “hate-speech” is un-Constitutional as I understand it; as is compelling private enterprise to do “the right thing”
He said on Charlie Kirk’s show this morning that anybody can say what they want about Charlie Kirk or anyone else. He went a lot further than a poster dispute.
Walsh is right. I don’t think Charlie Kirk would support the government controlling the speech of any company for any reason. He was against the colleges and the government controlling his speech and if he were running a college or in the government he would not ban his opponents speech.
Too funny. Just on this speech issue, her statements oppose the 1st Amendment. Is that OK with you? And pressuring a private business to kowtow? Are you a Conservative?
This is not even going back to so much that is questionable about her decisions from the beginning, nor does it consider her Fla manipulation of the Trevon Martin fiasco. And of course her special relationship with Suzie Wiles.
Cool story broh. What is the legal definition of “hate” speech?
Goldwater and other conservatives lost the right to refuse service to anyone in 1964. I'm not sure what is meant “we won that fight.”
Given the magnitude of President Trump’s competence, and the loyalty and the allegiance we owe him for his massive sacrifices, the bar for criticizing anyone in his cabinet should be much higher.
I don’t think any patriot capable of careful thinking would be so ready to call for getting rid of Pam Bondi. It just doesn’t make sense, and all our enemies are jumping all over it.
Because our enemies are afraid of Pam Bondi!
Nah, he’s not stupid. Just misguided purist.
Think Rand Paul or anyone wears a bowtie on TV.
Seems draconian. Consider the source. “Hate speech” is protected, not in need of government intervention. There are ways to mete out consequences without invoking courts.
Matt Walsh is wrong.
The fight we won was over "creative" service, not routine transactional service.
A baker cannot be compelled to design and bake a "gay wedding" cake, but that same baker cannot refuse to sell donuts or a fresh-baked loaf of rye bread to a gay person.
It's the same issue here: a printer might refuse to design a poster for a Charlie Kirk vigil, but that same printer cannot refuse to mass reproduce flyers that a customer brought to be printed.
Otherwise, banks can refuse to open accounts for a conservative simply because of their beliefs.
-PJ
Can we trade matt for charlie ?
“Hate Speach” and “Propaganda”
Are Both nebulous terms. Defined by whoever at that instant.
All advertising, by its nature IS Propaganda.
Either you have/ believe in/ Free Speech, or you don’t.
The Bigger issue, as I see it is you have the US AG, A $10k/ hr Lawyer, getting distracted from important functions, to weigh in where 2 office depot Asshats, made a wrong choice, and have already been fired.
Is the US AG going to make them even MOAR Fired?
How much do you think Pam Bondi knows that you don’t know?
I’m referring to things like intelligence and counterintelligence.
Remember the bakers who didn’t want to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple?
My issue here is that it was some clerk who didn’t give a damn about the company losing half their customers over the print job. If an owner wants to say no, fine.
Politics is not a protected class. So, as tasteless as the refusal may be, there is no Constitutional reason for the DOJ to be involved. Seems like the AG of the US would understand that.
The stupidity of Matt Walsh can be clearly seen in his mental deficit.
His mental deficit causes failure to understand context.
Context includes the view from where Pam Bondi sits. Intelligence and espionage.
Since we can’t know her view fully, we resort to trust in her and in Trump. For Walsh to miss this is low IQ.
We don’t disagree, it was not the owner’s decision, it was the worker’s. And the owner corrected the behavior. More proof we don’t need the gov’t telling private businesses what services they must provide.
They are not afraid of Bondi. They jumped on it because they can yell hypocrisy and make Trump look bad.
Susie Wiles is tight with Bondi and that is why she skates with POTUS.
I do hope she proves us wrong because I would be happy to apologize if she starts delivering.
Thank goodness for Harmeet Dhillon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.