Posted on 09/16/2025 11:22:34 AM PDT by Miami Rebel
“She does not speak carefully. Because (apparently) there is no Epstein Client List. She should not have said “It’s on my desk.”
Absolutely 1000%.
AG Pam Barbie is *clearly* out of her depth & Matt Gaetz was was a bad choice, I agree Ted Cruz would have better choice, it seems that Trump has made terrible choices for AG since his 1st admin...
We voted for the counter~revolution, a return to “common sense”, so where are the indictments for high crimes & misdemeanors against the USA (which even low IQ voters can see), that have seriously damaged the Nation?
The AG should be measured in their words, not going off half-cocked, why can’t some see beyond the glitzy, manicured image to comprehend that Pam isn’t the right person for the job?
Sorry, but this crap needs to end like yesterday, so I agree with Matt, the AG is damaging the admin, & MAGA is getting tired of promises not kept by someone that appears to be full of themself.
Trump miraculously surviving two (2) assassination attempts clearly represents he has a “Mandate From Heaven”, maybe we all need to pray for the “right” person to assume the reigns at the DOJ before it’s too late?
In case you didn’t know it, this is an existential fight for Truth, Justice & the American way ~ The clock is ticking...
“(is she a real blonde?)”
From the photographic evidence, she is not.
She also seems to spend a lot of time in a makeup artist’s chair for her TV closeups...
This is not the time for a woman in a man’s job, although Tulsi is an amazing patriot pulling it off, Pam has not.
You know who else would do an amazing job as AG?
George Pataki, who I’ve personally talked with more than once (a true, down-to-earth patriot), that is no B$ in front of a camera & would have Rudy as his wingman/advisor every step of the way.
Time to clean house...
Keep in mind that for all her flaws, she has worked as Trump’s attorney in the past. That is probably the single biggest reason why she was hired in the first place, and might be more than enough reason to keep her there.
I don’t know why she’s there, it is a figurehead position, but I’m sure there are *far* better men for the job...
If Rudy Giuliani isn’t part inside the loop that would be a crime, as he is an expert in RICO as the man who destroyed the mob when he ran the SDNY USAO...
We don’t need someone that looks good on TV, we need someone that knows how to take down mobsters.
And that’s what the corrupt libtard democraps are, highly evolved mobsters...
Don’t know Matt, but happily skip his vitriol.
There’s enough of THAT coming from the Left
You shouldn’t talk about things you have -0- knowledge about, he is more conservative than Charlie was, who was also a close friend, and makes AG Pam Barbie look like a democrat.
I don’t agree with Matt’s bombastic manner, I’m much more like Charlie (shouldn’t we all be?), but he’s done more for MAGA than ‘I’m ready for my closeup” Pam is capable of doing, in fact she’s harmed MAGA for more than helped it...
With that said, if there aren’t some very serious indictments, arrests & prosecutions happening by the Christmas break, *everyone* will 100% know something *VERY* wrong within the Trump admin...
Perhaps Charlie’s death can shore things up, for awhile, but the midterms are gonna be a mess, with a lot of law & order voters choosing to just stay home.
“Mercy To The Guilty Is Cruelty To The Innocent” - Adam Smith
“He wants her gone because she is effective.”
Compared to a man with spiritual sanity, she is an absolute joke & a total failure:
https://x.com/MonBreeden/status/1968020140899045394
Rudy Giuliani is 81 years old, dude. And he was past his prime two decades ago.
I hate to say this, but Pam might be there due to cronyism + sorta being a hot chick.
Pam is tight with both Susie Wiles & Kash Patel, which both might be more than a bit miffed if Trump let her go...
Never the less, the words “You’re Fired!” should be heard in the WH, if meritocracy is truly valued above all else.
In a more normal time, sure, give her some time to sort it out, but these are not “normal” times.
Sessions & Barr were backstabbing snakes, you’d think Trump would be more careful about the person in charge of cleaning house after the insanity he, his family + the nation has been subjected to in the last decade...
Serious times require serious people, and yes, while they might not be glamorous there are seasoned legal warriors, real patriots, ready & able to step up to the challenge.
Oh, I never suggested Rudy for AG, just someone that would be invaluable in building RICO cases 9 ways to Sunday.
Then again, the last time I saw Governor Pataki in 2015 he was a very healthy man, who loved his country & would gladly serve if called upon.
He’s also close to Rudy & they are a great team...
It’s time for the reality TV show version of “kayfabe” with Trump to change scripts, the President has all of the support he needs to get the job done, even without Charlie to support & help.
Sic semper tyrannis
Sessions and Barr were two of the best AGs of the last 40+ years. That tells you how low the bar is for that cabinet post.
Hate speech is any speech those in power say it is. The founders of this nation would be horrified by anyone using the term.
That misleading comparison may explain some of the confusion. Not all hate speech is actionable, as the woke Left would have one think, while all threatening speech can be regarded as hate speech.
Whether hate speech is actionable clearly depends on the political inclinations of the party in office. See for instance, Biden's FBi investigating Churches, school organizations formed by parents, Kirk's Turning Point, and others simply because they voiced sentiments that seemed to pose a threat to the Admin.
The AG has clearly defined for the public's benefit the specific type of hate speech the R admin will investigate and prosecute as a matter of her oath of office.
The public has the responsibility of understanding that language.
What does it take to stop and think about what Pam Bondi might see that you don’t have access to? Is it brains, or is it guts?
This isn’t a video game.
Sure.
As for me, I’ll wait on Trump’s decision about the whole thing. I’d vote for him a billion times before I’d vote for you.
Hate speech IS free speech. Outlawing hate speech is what Britain has done. How has that worked out?
Bondi is an idiot.
I hate the term Hate Speech. That’s a lefty term.
You are right. I should at least listen to what he has to say
Regards
Everyone on our side need to concentrate on our war on the left
This is noise and Matt’s self importance unfortunately
“This is noise and Matt’s self importance unfortunately”
He’s an “influencer” on Twitter. An exaggerated opinion of one’s self-worth is SOP in that crowd.
Matt Walsh has 3.8 Million “followers”. The people with that number of followers are:
Celebrities. Rock stars. Actors. World class athletes. UK Royals. Sydney Sweeney.
Matt Walsh is none of those. The other way you get millions of followers, when you’re not famous, is to buy them. Which is probably how he acquired most of his.
Matt Walsh has all of the expertise and political wisdom of someone who was 2 yrs old when Bush Sr won the 1988 election. Charlie Kirk was even younger, but Matt Walsh is no Charlie Kirk.
I’ve had more time to look into this.
There’s a fundamental concept we on this site have discussed for decades—loyalty to principle vs personality.
As each of you have appeared to advocate, loyalty to principle should always take precedence over loyalty to personality. I agree with you on this.
But for me, it’s tough to diminish my loyalty to President Trump.
I’ve trusted President Trump on Bondi. Apart from that I haven’t focused much on her. It comes down to either she believes what she’s saying about hate speech or she’s playing 5D chess in some way or another. I have no doubt Trump is involved in a high level subterfuge. But with my inquiries during the past few hours, I can’t find a convincing way to fit Bondi’s comment on “hate speech” into the puzzle.
If Bondi truly believes what she’s saying about “hate speech,” then Matt Walsh is right that she should be fired as AG. But if not, then all bets are off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.