Skip to comments.
Starbucks Under Fire for Allegedly Banning "Charlie Kirk" from Drink Orders
jfeed.com ^
| 9-16-25
| Eliana Fleming
Posted on 09/16/2025 10:23:35 AM PDT by doug from upland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: Larry Lucido
“I am Charlie.”
Je suis Charlie
To: doug from upland
If I want Starbucks I’ll just brew a pot and throw some burning charcoal in it.
42
posted on
09/16/2025 1:58:02 PM PDT
by
mykroar
("It's Not the Nature of the Evidence; It's the Seriousness of the Charge." - El Rushbo)
To: real saxophonist
They are too stupid to get it
43
posted on
09/16/2025 2:03:52 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
To: Samurai_Jack
I AM
44
posted on
09/16/2025 2:08:22 PM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
To: doug from upland
Seems valid to me. The whole point is they be able to call the name and get ONE person to say “yes” and grab the order. If a bunch of people are using the name that’s defeated. Also, really people, that’s how you honor somebody? That’s lame.
45
posted on
09/16/2025 2:10:06 PM PDT
by
discostu
(like a dog being shown a card trick)
To: doug from upland
I don’t any conservatives who patronize Dtarbucks.
46
posted on
09/16/2025 2:40:38 PM PDT
by
Bigg Red
( Lord, make me an instrument of your peace.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson