Posted on 09/16/2025 8:14:19 AM PDT by simpson96
Joy Reid, Mike Obama and Jackson Brown were accepted into Ivy League schools NOT because of their intellect but specifically because of their race. Those universities have long ago removed acceptance rates based on merit. They are all now about spreading Marxist indoctrination and hating Whitey.
None of those “women” are qualified for their roles in the private sector. Brown has demonstrated herself that she is a total incompetent, a glorious nincompoop who does not belong on the Supreme Court.
Zora Rodgers would hate Charlie Kirk regardless of what he said about those three. But what else would you expect from a democrat.
They’re twisting Charlie Kirk’s words b/c he’s not here to defend himself.
Fortunately, he has powerful friends like JD Vance who will cover for him.
She feels good about herself for 'doing her part' (hello, ignorant White Guilt), to 'fix' that.
Follow the money:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/your-money/norte-dame-muslim-philanthropists.html
Cheers!
Yes and no. Context is everything.
Charlie Kirk publicly commented, following the Supreme Court's June 2023 end to affirmative action in college admissions, that certain prominent Black women—Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson—had said they personally benefitted from affirmative action. He argued that, had he described these women as beneficiaries, he would be denounced as racist; yet, according to him, they themselves made this admission. Kirk went further, claiming that these specific women were unable to achieve success based solely on their own merit or intelligence, and that affirmative action gave them opportunities that would have otherwise gone to more qualified individuals.
Here's one link to the actual comments if it helps:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOcKFt4AWhY/
The legacy media is distorting his comments as if he went out of his way to attack “black women”.
Here are some more links that may help with context as well:
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/29/michelle-obama-affirmative-action-00104211
https://x.com/MichelleObama/status/1674430722529169408?lang=en
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-sheila-jackson-lee-says-clear-recipient-affirmative-action
I was unable to verify that Ketanji Brown Jackson specifically admitted to benefitting from affirmative action. It's possible he confused that Sotomayor said she benefitted (since she said so as well). But I'll give Kirk the benefit of the doubt. If anyone from the left wanted to correct the record, they could have. Instead, they switched the debate with misleading and outright false claims.
You have to remember that Charlie Kirk and everyone on this forum is automatically racist to the left, and no amount of proof will ever be enough to convince them otherwise.
They could use Charlie Kirk's famous phrase, “Prove me wrong.” But people cannot be proved wrong when they do not believe something based on logic or facts.
> The entire thing starts with the false premise of systematic racism and inherent white supremacy, what utter bilge.
She probably wrote it for a class and got an “A” on it. Or wrote it for the school newspaper web site.
> “Zora Rodgers is a junior studying film, television, and theatre.
She’s going to make some unlucky man an excruciatingly painful ex-wife.
“vaguely familiar with Kirk for his controversial right-wing extremist takes” You are vaguely familiar but certain that he was an extremist. Yet you want us to take anything else you said seriously.
“Why was he challenging the intellectual competency of these Black women when they have run educational laps around him?”
There are plenty of highly educated people who are dumb as rocks. As Forest Gump said “Stupid is as stupid does”.
I was rooting for the Convicts.
I bet she uses “Latinx” when talking about Mexicans.
Is she a furry too?
One of the errors the author makes is when she conflates some difference between having or not having certain academic degrees as representing greater or lessor intellectual ability. In reality, the attainment of academic degrees cannot be consistently conflated with greater intellectual ability; the later can exist without having spent time putting it to the attainment of the former; and the former is a result of often subjective judgement calls of professors, not an empirical intellectual examination, like an IQ test.
Harvard University Press published Swain's first academic book, Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress in 1993.[9][10][11][12] It received the D.B. Hardeman Prize and the American Political Science Association's Woodrow Wilson Foundation Award.[13] Swain later accused deposed Harvard President Claudine Gay of plagiarizing portions of her book, stating, "Maybe she didn’t know any better, but it would qualify as plagiarism under Harvard’s own rules."[14] In 2024, Swain released A Gay Affair, published by Be the People Books.[15] This book followed Claudine Gay's resignation as President of Harvard on January 2, 2024.Dr. Swain is the real thing, but the former Harvard President Claudine Gay was a DEI hire. Do you see what we are talking about Zora Rodgers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.