You implied there were no adverse effects of the clot shot because you never saw anybody collapse after getting the shot while conducting surveillance.
“You implied there were no adverse effects of the clot shot because you never saw anybody collapse after getting the shot while conducting surveillance.”
I might have observed ~2,000 people in total. Such an observation would not reliably detect a 1 to 4 in a million problem.
If an attorney has the clot, and it has been preserved, I’m pretty sure it can be determined if the vaccine was involved.
https://www.antibodiesinc.com/pages/the-fundamentals-of-immunofluorescence-staining