Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

17 Mechanisms Linking mRNA Shots to Cancer, Backed by Over 100 Studies
Drtrozzi.news ^ | Sep 09, 2025 | drtrozzi.news

Posted on 09/09/2025 9:47:18 AM PDT by ransomnote

[H/T Jane Long]

The following is Dr. Trozzi's introduction followed by my exerpt of the excellent article of the same name translated from the original French.

A comprehensive review of peer-reviewed research uncovering potential cancer-promoting effects of mRNA injections across multiple biological pathways. 

I’m encouraged to see the old academic towers finally echoing the warnings many of us shared early on, often at great personal cost, about the medical assault and misrepresented injection campaigns.

We must pray the perpetrators of these COVID crimes are not gearing up for a second wave of profit, this time by treating the cancers they helped cause. They must face justice, not enjoy rewards.

After a 2022 World Council for Health meeting, I released a 4½-minute cancer alert warning of the post-injection cancer surge now unfolding worldwide. This was one reason I stepped away from everything to help stop the rollout. I explained this more fully early on in This is Not a Vaccine.

Thanks to Nic Hulscher for raising awareness of this story, the researchers behind the latest study, La Pointe Critique, and all the courageous medical professionals who have stood for truth. Their sacrifices matter.

The truth is rising. Stay the course.


Translated from the original French publication in La Pointe Critique (read original). While the translation may not be perfect, we have done our best to faithfully preserve the original meaning.


A portion of the scientific community raised the alarm more than four years ago about the cancer risks linked to mRNA COVID injections. Today, data from the scientific literature suggest these injections may have the potential to induce, accelerate, or reactivate cancers through 17 different mechanisms.

Is mass COVID vaccination at the root of an explosion in cancer cases, as many scientists claim, some of whom had predicted it as early as May 2021? A group of French oncologists published an op-ed two years ago in which they categorically rejected this hypothesis:

"To date, no warning signal has been published indicating an increased incidence or risk of rapid cancer progression following COVID-19 vaccination or any other vaccination."

Today, however, they report being faced with a tsunami of aggressive, fast-growing cancers, particularly among young people, for which they say there is no rational explanation:

We are seeing a lightning-fast rise in pancreatic cancer without having the slightest idea why. Did something happen? We don't know. The entire world, the entire field of oncology, is asking the same question. [...] The system that allows us to understand cancer is failing.

Prof. Khayat, co-founder of the InCA (French National Cancer Institute)

MORE OF THIS EXCELLENT ARTICLE AT THE LINK: 17 Mechanisms Linking mRNA Shots to Cancer, Backed by Over 100 Studies


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bigpharma; bigprofit; cancer; conspiratards; crimesvshumanity; furiousjabshills; jab; mrna; thisisjunkscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Fury

This isn’t DU ...


21 posted on 09/09/2025 11:25:26 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 17 Mechanisms Linking mRNA Shots to Cancer, Backed by Over 100 Studies, Brian Griffin wrote:

The NHS has more comprehensive data. I can’t justify spending the time.

https://digital.nhs.uk/ndrs/data/data-sets/rcrd

No. You can't justify wasting your time on the linked data. The UK doesn't have President Trump or RJK Jr. and their data continues to be vicious lies to support a toxic, merciless C19 'vaccine'.


22 posted on 09/09/2025 11:27:48 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Blood cancer, I think that is what I have from the jab.
Just had blood work done again.

The site above this one is about end of life experiences.

So I got that going for me.


23 posted on 09/09/2025 11:31:40 AM PDT by Cold Heart (Democrats protect criminals and prosecute innocents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 17 Mechanisms Linking mRNA Shots to Cancer, Backed by Over 100 Studies, Brian Griffin wrote:

“A vaccine is a type of medicine that trains the body’s immune system so that it can fight a disease it has not come into contact with before.”

“Page last updated Thursday, January 3, 2019”

https://vaccineknowledge.ox.ac.uk/how-do-vaccines-work

Odd that you had to use a UK source for the definition of 'vaccine'. 

I used the CDC's original definition - that it grants immunity from an illness. I copied it into a post. Then the CDC changed the definition to support the mRNA propaganda. I wonder if they ever changed it back.

The Globalists had been planning the pandemic for years (see, for example, Event 201 international conferences).

For the record, Moderna's quarterly report stated that their C19 was 'gene therapy.' It is and always was gene therapy.


24 posted on 09/09/2025 11:32:07 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

Abnormally shaped red blood cells, unable to carry oxygen. Platelets and white cells are fine. You suffer hypoxia although you have plenty of red blood cells. They just don’t deliver oxygen.


25 posted on 09/09/2025 11:39:41 AM PDT by blackdog ((Z28.310) "Diggin the scene with a gangster lean" (Mayfield, Curtis) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

That’s what happened to my relative. Cancer kept popping up everywhere.


26 posted on 09/09/2025 11:40:28 AM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 17 Mechanisms Linking mRNA Shots to Cancer, Backed by Over 100 Studies, blackdog wrote:

Also linked to my deceased brother. He ran a chain of nursing homes and had to lead by example. Each shot put him in the hospital. The last one did the job. The entire floor at U of P Hospital was occupied by all of the same men with blood cancers that were of unknown type. All had to get bone marrow transplants that never worked. All were managed as cases from outside researchers. Basically the hospital leased its floor out to Pharma researchers to study what went wrong? After six weeks they sent them all to nursing homes to die. (Ironic, huh?)

I cringed reading your post. How painful. I'm so sorry.

The contents of the 'vax' vials were not uniform. Dr. Yeadon, former Chief of Science at Pfizer's Infectious diseases wing said the fact that the vaccine harm reported varied in intensity based on the lot number of the vax meant the contents could NOT be uniform. He said this disparity among vaccine vials would have to be intentional because the manufacturing process is so tightly controlled.

He speculated that different lot numbers of the C19 'vax' likely contained contents which constituted various studies by different researchers. Others have speculated that they were gauging on-the-spot lethality (can't have too many people dropping in the hallways of the clinic).

I believe these lines of speculation are true - they had billions of unwitting free test subjects to work with. Based on the national vaccine registry, they could know the C19 vaccine lot number for each of the vaxxed men - direct research. Inject people with various products and record their reaction. Based on unified medical record systems (AI Epic, for example) they could track human health in response to specific vaccine lot #s. It was a research bonaza for monsters to experiment on people without their knowing it was happening. 


27 posted on 09/09/2025 11:44:14 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thanks, RN!
Bkmk


28 posted on 09/09/2025 12:11:20 PM PDT by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

I don’t believe anyone has looked at my blood cells for abnormal shapes. I occasionally still get hypoxia but it used to be much worse before taking iron supplements. I had oxygen readings below 85 several times. (it was somewhere below that and coming up before I could get a reading)

WBC normal
RBC, HGB, HCT, below normal
D-Dimer (clots) above normal

Up and down a little but consistantly off since the shot.
I had my blood work done before I go in to see my Dr. this time. I’ll ask if the red cells have been observed in the past.

I have been on Ivermectin for 4 years and believe that is what has kept it where it is and not gotten worse.

I will be starting that Fenbenzadol(sp?) Ivermectin, vit C protocol soon.


29 posted on 09/09/2025 12:18:42 PM PDT by Cold Heart (Democrats protect criminals and prosecute innocents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

The red cells produced are too large and not shaped right. Yes, your oxygen levels drop. Blood transfusions fix you for a week.


30 posted on 09/09/2025 12:21:28 PM PDT by blackdog ((Z28.310) "Diggin the scene with a gangster lean" (Mayfield, Curtis) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Agreed and thank goodness. But there’s one major theme about the COVID-19 vaccines. Those that don’t adhere to that and all that that comes with their beliefs are in for rough sledding.


31 posted on 09/09/2025 12:32:56 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

Give it up, Brian.

No SALE, here, on your jabs.


32 posted on 09/09/2025 12:34:43 PM PDT by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt; datura; Fractal Trader; grey_whiskers; metmom; Jane Long; tatown; Golden Eagle; ...

PING


33 posted on 09/09/2025 12:37:04 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fury

We need to do better. We need to address differences of opinion with facts and logic, not with buzzwords and name-calling.


34 posted on 09/09/2025 12:52:16 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Agreed. There’s lots of progress to be made.

The other thing is that some of the crap you see posted are things that posters would never say in person. A good example is calling Congressman Dan Crenshaw “Eyepatch McCain”. Not one poster who posts that phrase on-line has had the guts to say it directly to his face.


35 posted on 09/09/2025 1:00:53 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Society needs to wake up to the start realization before their eyes.

Every single person who had a hand in forcing people to get the jabs, from OBiden, Fauci, to the local doctors and corrupt bureaucrats, and the country that created the virus in the first place, China, should all be held responsible for mass murder and either imprisoned or given the death penalty themselves.

36 posted on 09/09/2025 1:39:21 PM PDT by ducttape45 (Jeremiah 17:9, "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; All

The perfect Crime Against Humanity. Plausible deniability. Immunity.


37 posted on 09/09/2025 2:05:11 PM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Day by day more information surfaces.


38 posted on 09/09/2025 3:56:23 PM PDT by BFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thanks for the ping, ransomnote….good post!


39 posted on 09/09/2025 4:27:19 PM PDT by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fury; ransomnote
The other thing is that some of the crap you see posted are things that posters would never say in person. A good example is calling Congressman Dan Crenshaw “Eyepatch McCain”. Not one poster who posts that phrase on-line has had the guts to say it directly to his face.

Not one? Are you sure you know the personalities of millions of posters?

Pretty sure there are plenty of Patriots that would relish the opportunity to do that. I would...

40 posted on 09/09/2025 4:36:04 PM PDT by MountainDad (A strong man stands up for himself. A stronger man stands up for others. Support your local militia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson