Karl Denninger did some analysis of the lots vs reported adverse events. He found there were definitely "hot lots" that cause much higher number of adverse reactions.
I did my first analysis of the VAERS data just a month after the rollout. I was looking for adverse events resulting in death vs the number of days after injection. I found a large spike in the 0 to 3 days post injection time frame. Another small spike around 20 days. I chose that manner of observation because the CDC was trying to obfuscate the adverse events by defining "fully vaccinated" as limited to the time from 14 days after the injection. Using that method, the deaths in the 0 to 3 days post injection time frame were labeled "unvaccinated". A total lie to cover up the adverse effects.
I re-ran my analysis against 10 months of data in VAERS and found the original pattern of deaths in the 0 to 3 day time frame was still valid.
I did my first analysis of the VAERS data just a month after the rollout
——————-
I took a screen shot of VAERs when it hit 780,000 reported adverts effects ( death, myocarditis, etc…)….just before the injuries hit 800,000 they pulled it and no longer reported VAERS numbers to the public.
Evil.
” A total lie to cover up the adverse effects.”
So obviously a lie. Practically from the very beginning, this demonic tactic was publicized.