RFK Jr. did well during the inquisition.
Well Debra J Saunders has made herself completely irrelevant by supporting COVID vaccines. If I ever wanted to be taken seriously I would never admit to supporting a vaccine for a respiratory virus which cannot be vaccinated against regardless of the infection or the vaccine. The immune response to a respiratory virus does not happen until the virus takes hold and a vaccine is supposed to prevent it from taking hold. I liked her until now.
And right there's where I stopped reading. . .
“Tastes great. Less filling.”
They control the narrative by leading both sides of a debate for which both sides agree on some same underlying premises or they distract from the real issue to be addressed.
They are unwilling to look at the different types of vaccines, their primary purposes, and that many have different missions in a public health setting.
I have taken non mRNA vaccines, that have been properly tests, and have a purpose of once vaccinated, preventing illness. Mumps, measles, chicken pox, are such vaccines. There purpose is to provide herd immunity via natural exposure plus vaccination.
Other vaccines such as the Covid-19 were designed to not prevent catching the disease, or preventing its spread, but to reduce the severity of the illness, by mRNA replicating within the body to provide continued new antibodies. The biggest problem with the Covid-19 vaccines were that they were not adequately tested to learn all side effects and they were nearly mandatory forced upon young people who have little change of being harmed by Covid-19. But mass hysteria was occurring and government pushed a “solution” that gave people a sense that something was being done. We have found out that there are lots of harmful side effects to some who took these mRNA vaccines
I object, and the author misses her unintentional slur. WE are the ones with the science, not the so-called ‘reverent left.’ WE have the receipts and still the left denies.
There are even some here who believe that we must provide evidence to move forward despite all of the revelations of the past couple of years.
I object to the term ‘covid skeptic’. It’s no different than the derisive term ‘anti-vaxxer’ used so liberally - ahem - by others here.
The term which ought be adopted:
COVID Realists (or the-like, but certainly not the debased ‘truther’ term). The author discredits herself with her poor title.
If there’s a better term which doesn’t come to my mind at this writing, submit it.