~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I thought I saw that kind of scar before...
(One of the astronauts from the first "Planet of the Apes" movie, after getting lobotomized...)
š·
Posted on 08/31/2025 9:08:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
Joe looks frozen and blank in this 2022 exchange with President Trump. Actually Joe looks scared, as if he'll be in trouble with his handlers after the debate. No pudding for Joe.
The MSM just makes these blatant exposures of crime disappear, as they return to the FAKE RussiaRussiaRussia narrative.
Sometimes I just can't believe the bizarre reality to which we have been subjected. We see what appears to be a large incision on his head and wonder if he had brain surgery, or in my case I wondered if he's faking injury to escape prosecution, or if he had failed technology removed, leaving the rest of his head empty. *sigh*
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled I never heard the words Ukraine and Zelinsky until three and a half years ago., ransomnote wrote: [H/T Foldspace]
12/22/2022, 7:58:24 PM Ā· 4 of 30How different the world would look, and how much better the American memory would function, if our MSM wasn't wall-to-wall traitors.
Thank you for the repost. It occurs to me that we are now in the middle of the REAL pandemic. My grandmother died when she was 98 and lived through the 1917 influenza pandemic. She told me that they knew it was a pandemic because everyone knew 10 people who died and one of them was in your family. Thatās also how I knew the 2020 covid scamdemic was fake. I now know of 10 people in my circle who have died suddenly, and a nephew is now one of them. He was only 35 and obese by most standards. He was also very vaccinated. Maybe a coincidence? The number of friends with either neuropathy in their extremities or serious kidney issues is also extraordinarily high. Three with kidney cancer, five with neuropathy, all jabbed at least three times. All of my unvaccinated friends and acquaintances have good health for their ages with no sudden or unusual problems. Itās unbelievable to me that people are not talking about the increase in debilitating conditions and deaths.
lol
but dark
.
Regarding banks and e-checks versus physical checks, It is the receiving entity that decides how to deal with payments. And there must be some minuscule amount of money to be saved by using the physical payment method over pure electronic payment. The local power company here does their billing through a third party that required a check be drawn, so I have to pay a few days earlier than I would to get that payment there on time.
There’s also that “float” period - the money can be drawn from your account and not make it to the payee for a few days. Who is drawing interest on YOUR money during that time frame?
I got messed up a couple of months ago with this scheme, and as a result, I’ve started sending my payment electronically (to me, electronically, but apparently not to them) 3 or 4 days earlier because of that float period on some payees. It’s frustrating and annoying.
My biggest banking issue now has been moving - this new bank has literally thrown up multiple roadblocks to my banking despite my being a really nice guy. :) Seriously, they wouldn’t let me add “payees” to my account for a couple of weeks after starting the account. Then, after a couple of months, they finally let me link my credit union account to this one so that I can continue the task of moving funds from my old banking entity to the new one - only to turn that feature off also (for about 10 days). And that transfer is not without the 3-5 business day “float” either. Money drawn from old bank, wait 3-5 days, finally shows up in new account.
In my opinion, electronic payments ought to be as fast as wiring the money - that is, almost instant.
That's not what Musk said.
850
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 25b191 No.563358
Mar 6 2018 00:39:55 (EST)
Learn double meanings.
News unlocks MAP.
Why is STEEL so important?
Expand your thinking.
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00810A004000690005-7.pdf
Q
Slide____
TOPIC; AI posts
ISSUE; FR has a long-standing tradition of requiring users to cite the sources for facts which are claimed and reported. This has served us well in securing truth, understanding bias, exposing deception and exposing propaganda by leftists who try to infiltrate the forum. This “show us the source for your claims” is a bedrock for revealing truth at FR.
With this in mind, we’re seeing a deviation from this questioning regarding the AI query responses posted at FR. The AI query responses are NEVER required to cite sources for the AI conclusions, as is normally required of any user in the forum.
While AI isn’t a freeper, the claims it makes ~should~ be evaluated just like any user claims are evaluated and ~should~ be questioned, because AI is being posted as though it is reliable news source. We immediately question the lying media “stories” and should treat AI “stories” with the same caution.
The assumption regarding AI information provided, is that AI responses are fact. Oddly, the assumption that AI is telling the truth is becoming so ingrained in our preconceptions that the AI responses are very rarely questioned. Sometimes a FReeper will expose the AI pre-programmed bias, but this happening less frequently. I am concerned that we are being programmed to accept AI claims without question...and this can be a dangerously deceptive path.
SUGGESTION; When posting an AI reply, require AI to cite the sources of its claims, as we would do to any freeper post.
AI is NOT 100% factually reliable. We’ve already learned that it is programed to be biased toward leftist views. Let us demand that AI cite it’s sources for the responses and conclusions it presents as facts.
The AI lovers will not do so, because some are militantly biased to accept AI as factually imperical wisdom, yet accepting an opponent’s pretext claim to truth is the first step in being deceived.
To users who post AI query responses, ask the freeper to require AI to cite the sources for it’s claims and re-post the AI responses.
One interesting areas of discussion in the video below is the claim that AI is being directed to gradually move to a more biased deception. Facts for you today, to gain your trust, then once your trust is gained, the deception begins.
With that said, below is a 17min video which runs parallel to these thoughts. Is the AI interaction here presented real? I don’t know, but it is worth considering.
I Got ChatGPT To Admit Its Antichrist Purpose
https://www.bitchute.com/video/D42JXqKbzFWT
Brethren, be wise!
In the future, when I read a FR post showing an AI query response, I may ask the freeper to return to the query and ask the AI to cite sources which we can check for ourselves, because AI has a track record of blatant bias and we should question AI as we would do to any human user in the forum. This is reasonable. Blind trust in claims of fact opens us to deception.
Does anyone else see this as reasonable?
May God’s Spirit be our guide in all that we see, hear and say.
I was invited, but unfortunately could not attend. A representative of mine will be there.ā Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 4, 2025
You raise a good point. I have no confidence in any of the responses that AI provides to questions. Itās just a computer searching its database for information but thereās no quality control on the database itself. GIGO. That makes it inherently unreliable. Hereās a bit of proof ā I dictated the sentences above and the database that allows for this convenience consistently spells its in āits databaseā as itās rather than its. It spelled the first āitāsā correctly though. If it canāt even apply well-known and standard use of English rules, why would I ever trust it with more complicated tasks?
Good post RE: AI veracity [Where’s the sauce?]
I provide the following from the AI discourse I posted yesterday:
Political Junkie 2: “The original AI report contains over 100 internet citations to back up its assertions, but I removed them for clarity and length. In future AI analysis, I may consider keeping them for scholarly reference if readers feel it is needed.”
YMMV
Errata: Attribute to Political Junkie Too
Yes, AI should cite sources and present them with every answer. People seem to think that AI is actually intelligent, but so far, all I’ve seen is its answers parroting what it has read from other unreliable sources.
I want to know facts, not what AI dug up from the lying left-wing mainstream media.
I’ve noticed issues with electronic payments starting this past April. Quarterly taxes are due and we received notice from our accountant that, starting September 30, all federal taxes must be paid electronically.
We are less than 30 days out from “no more checks” and electronic payment systems have suddenly developed a bug?
Curious....
My first thought is there are some TDS wacko sabotage going on.
I agree with you, that AI query responses needs sources!
Pinging MqD
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4337936/posts?page=851#851
The location of Bidenās wound is in a very similar area that my sister had her incision after aneurysm surgery. But then my sister had a brain something I wonder about with him. Maybe they tried to insert a functioning brain.
!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
