|
Posted on 08/31/2025 9:08:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115119962578158249
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Federal level recusals are the sole decision of the judge in question.
Such motions are simply “considered” yet do point to a reason for appeal.
He had 2 prices....
Price 1...he would take the chimney apart brick by brick...starting at the top
Price 2...he would demolish the chimney.
He would shore up the bottom fire hole with wood...and take a more bricks out ,,,putting more timbers in to stabilize the chimney,
Set fire to the wood and retire from a safe distance.
When the timbers burnt down...the chimney would topple over.
I think this will likely be replicated in Ill-Annoy. The COVID-19 slush fund was like giving drugs to an addict. Gov Jelly Belly Prickster would happily raise taxes to cover his corruption....again.
I think Director Wray, who launched the "Mar-a-Lago Panty Wrayed" in Melania's undies drawer, will soon be standing right behind Comey, the 7-foot sack of crap, in an upcoming 'lying to Congress' trial.
True and per § 2200.68 Recusal of the Judge:
.....(c) Request for recusal. Any party may request that the Judge, at any time following the Judge’s designation and before the filing of a decision, be recused under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section or both by filing with the Judge, promptly upon the discovery of the alleged facts, an affidavit setting forth in detail the matters alleged to constitute grounds for recusal.
(d) Ruling on request. If the Judge finds that a request for recusal has been filed with due diligence and that the material filed in support of the request establishes that recusal either is appropriate under paragraph (a) of this section or is required under paragraph (b) of this section, the Judge shall recuse themself from the proceeding. If the Judge denies a request for recusal, the Judge shall issue a ruling on the record, stating the grounds for denying the request, and shall proceed with the hearing, or, if the hearing has closed, proceed with the issuance of a decision under the provisions of § 2200.90.
Part A & B:
(a) Discretionary recusal. A Judge may recuse themself from a proceeding whenever the Judge deems it appropriate.
(b) Mandatory recusal. A Judge shall recuse themself under circumstances that would require disqualification of a Federal judge under Canon 3(C) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, except that the required recusal may be set aside under the conditions specified by Canon 3(D).
Canon 3 (c) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges:
(C) Disqualification.
(1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances in which:
(a) the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;
(b) the judge served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom the judge previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or lawyer has been a material witness;
(c) the judge knows that the judge, individually or as a fiduciary, or the judge’s spouse or minor child residing in the judge’s household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be affected substantially by the outcome of the proceeding;
(d) the judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person related to either within the third degree of relationship, or the spouse of such a person is:
(i) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;
(ii) acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
(iii) known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding; or
(iv) to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding;
(e) the judge has served in governmental employment and in that capacity participated as a judge (in a previous judicial position), counsel, advisor, or material witness concerning the proceeding or has expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy.
(2) A judge should keep informed about the judge’s personal and fiduciary financial interests and make a reasonable effort to keep informed about the personal financial interests of the judge’s spouse and minor children residing in the judge’s household.
*****************************
Seeking Disqualification of a Federal Judge
https://ronaldwchapman.com/judicial-bias
Understanding 28 U.S.C. § 144
Section 144 addresses situations where a party believes that the judge has a personal bias or prejudice against them or in favor of any adverse party. The key requirements are:
Affidavit: The party must file a timely and sufficient affidavit stating the facts and reasons for the belief that bias or prejudice exists.
Timing: The affidavit must be filed not less than ten days before the beginning of the term at which the proceeding is to be heard, unless there is good cause for delay.
Content: The affidavit must state the facts and reasons for the belief that bias or prejudice exists, and it must be accompanied by a certificate of good faith from counsel.
Understanding 28 U.S.C. § 455
Section 455 provides broader grounds for disqualification and is applicable even without a party’s motion. The key provisions include:
Personal Bias or Prejudice: A judge shall disqualify themselves in any proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned (§ 455(a)).
Specific Circumstances: Disqualification is required if the judge has personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts, has a financial interest in the matter, or has previously acted as a lawyer in the matter (§ 455(b)).
Associations: If a judge or their family has an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding, disqualification is mandatory (§ 455(b)(4)).
What to Expect
Filing the Motion: You will need to file a motion with a supporting affidavit as specified in 28 U.S.C. § 144. The affidavit should detail specific facts and circumstances that suggest bias or prejudice.
Judge’s Response: The judge will review the motion and affidavit. If the judge finds the affidavit sufficient, they must step aside, and another judge will be assigned. If the judge finds the affidavit insufficient, they may continue to preside over the case.
Procedural Review: The judge’s decision on recusal can be reviewed by an appellate court if it is challenged. The appellate court will evaluate whether the judge abused their discretion in deciding not to recuse themselves.
Standard of Review: The appellate court typically reviews the denial of a recusal motion for abuse of discretion. This means the court will consider whether the judge’s decision was arbitrary or unreasonable based on the evidence presented.
Strategic Considerations
When filing a motion for judicial bias, consider the following strategic points:
Specificity and Timing: Ensure that the affidavit is specific and timely. General allegations of bias are insufficient; the affidavit must detail particular incidents or statements that demonstrate bias.
Good Faith: The motion must be filed in good faith. Frivolous or strategic filings intended to delay proceedings can backfire and potentially result in sanctions.
*****************
Filing for judicial recusal could extend the case for a lengthy time period, which given the political pressure from voters to arrest swamp critters, may not be feasible. This could be another example of how corrupt the federal judiciary is or since the judge is a Biden appointee the judge could be perturbed at how the demo-fascist have treated Biden and judge the case without bias. As things unfold it will be interesting to watch.
They don’t want the magic rocks that boil water to provide us with a glorious future of cheap electricity.
ransomnote wrote:
“
Trump Signs Presidential Memorandum Directing Jeanine Pirro, Bondi To Implement Death Penalty In DC
9/26/2025, 10:18:09 AM · by SmokingJoe
Forbes ^ | 09/25/2025 | Forbes
“
President Trump don’t play...
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 09/01/2025 Vol.511, Q Day 2866, thingumbob wrote: I’m sure the UN-azzhats won’t cut his teleprompter ever again…LMAO. They traded a 15 minute lecture from Trump for a 55 minute dressing down instead.
Miracles never seise and the Lord truly works in mysterious ways.
When I saw their wooden facial expressions, I wondered if they spent every minute of that dressing down thinking something like, "I told Hans we shouldn't do this, but noooooooooo....did he listen? And Mertz said this was a fail-safe tactic to humiliate!....Maybe Herr Mertz should have warned us it was 'safe and effective'...."
He is amazing. Of course the MSM reported his dazzling performance as 'alarming' 'rambling' etc. and some 'worried' about his mental health. I imagine many on the left never looked to confirm this for themselves. That's been a theme lately- taking Trump's apparent diplomatic 'reversals' (i.e., strategies) as signs of looming dementia and insisting he can't speak as well, language skills are in decline!!!
Since it was someone else’s misspellings, I let it go...
We called it "Fall-flats".
Well, don’t kow if it still exists but “Buckhorn” was likely the most rank beer I ever had.
Less then $10 for 24 bottle case.
“Fresh form the bathtub brewery!”
Stew Peters: Tyler Robinson Didn’t Assassinate Charlie Kirk; Here’s the Real Assassin
another frickin’ quack for clicks ...
Yeah, so who is it?
Argh I clicked on it...
Who did it, per Stew Peters?
It's going to be close but FReepers have always punched though in tight races to the finish. Please donate ASAP.
We're also grateful to collect prayers for our FReepathon.
Here's a shout-out to our monthly donors. THANK YOU! :D
Monthly Donors · Dollar-a-Day Donors · 300 Club Donors
or by
or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
THANK YOU FOR HELPING KEEP FREE REPUBLIC ONLINE! :D
Prayers up! 🙏🏻
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
