|
Posted on 08/31/2025 9:08:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115119962578158249
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
All I know is that it wasn’t’ armed. If was armed it wouldn’t have been allowed to reach a point of re-entry.
Confirming my inquisitive point. TY
It’s a ballistic nuke carrier a one-way ticket.
There has never been a successful test of an armed ICBM with MIRV. We don’t even know if it will work.
Zack-a-tackly!
Well, yes, it does a good job now.
The youngest generation (GenZero) is definitive in how much boolsheeto they accept.
| Section | Missive Claim | Refutation |
| Understanding the Missive | The "anti-Grok missive" blends etymology, computing history, biblical allegory, and conspiracy theories to argue AI (like Grok) is a demonic force masquerading as progress. It equates AI with "daimons" (recast as evil by Christianity), tech logos (FreeBSD daemon, Apple's apple) as temptation, and modern investments as transhumanist plots. AI is framed as a "great deception" from Revelation, eroding free will and God-given cognition via a satanic "apple" (tech). "Vampire rules" may imply AI's weaknesses; Operation Warp Speed suggests rushed deception. It's a call to reject AI as spiritually corrupting. | The missive uses loose associations and selective history, not evidence. Below, each claim is refuted with historical facts, linguistic scholarship, and data, addressing spiritual concerns while grounding in reality. AI is a tool, not a deity; its risks are debated openly, not deceptively. |
| 1. Etymology and History of "Demon/Daimon/Daemon" | "Daimon" was historically benign, but Christianity made it evil. Etymology is "fun" as a setup for AI as a deceptive spirit. | Greek daimōn meant a neutral or positive "spirit" or divine intermediary (e.g., Socrates' guiding voice). It became Latin daemon, neutral until Christianity equated pagan spirits with fallen angels in the Septuagint. In computing, "daemon" (1960s) is a neutral term for background processes, from Maxwell's Demon (physics), not theology. AI isn't supernatural; it's code, not spirits. |
| 2. Tech Logos as Demonic Symbols | FreeBSD's logo is a "daemon," Apple's is a biblical apple—symbols of temptation tied to AI. | FreeBSD's "Beastie" (red devil-like figure) references Unix software daemons (helpful tasks), not evil, since the 1970s. Apple's bitten apple (1977, Rob Janoff) is a "byte" pun and rainbow design for the Apple II, not Genesis' unspecified fruit (an apple in medieval lore). No Turing suicide link; that's a myth. These are design choices, not occult symbols. |
| 3. Investments in America: Transhumanist Agenda? | Most touted U.S. investments are transhumanist or "adjacent," promoting AI as a false god. | Transhumanism (enhancing humans via tech) intersects with some AI investments (e.g., Neuralink, OpenAI), backed by billions from Musk and others. Trump's 2025 Stargate ($500B AI plan) echoes accelerationism. But "most" is false: AI funds healthcare, agriculture, and climate tools—practical, not cyborg dreams. Transhumanism (coined 1957) is fringe, not a plot. Ethical AI (e.g., EU AI Act) counters unchecked hype. Tech optimism isn't new; it mirrors railroad or internet booms, not demons. |
| 4. AI as a "Lesser Deity or Guiding Spirit" | AI fits this definition, warned about in media, with vampire-like rules (hidden weaknesses). | Metaphorically, AI can "guide" like a daimon (e.g., in sci-fi like Her). Philosophers note Gnostic parallels (AI as a flawed demiurge), but it's just algorithms trained on human data, not divine. Media warnings are abundant: Terminator (1984), Ex Machina (2014), Bostrom's Superintelligence (2014), Pew (2025) on bias risks (50% of Americans see AI's news impact negatively). "Vampire rules" may critique AI's ethics (e.g., using artists' data), but it's no more supernatural than a photocopier. Risks are debated, not hidden. |
| 5. AI Parallels to Operation Warp Speed and Brain Changes | AI's rushed development mirrors Warp Speed's "deception"; like calculators/Google, it'll atrophy God-given brains. | Operation Warp Speed (2020) by any measure sped vaccines via parallel trials, saving millions with FDA oversight, not deception. "Warp Speed for AI" (2025 proposals) aims for safe speed, not trickery. Calculators/Google offloaded tasks but boosted problem-solving (studies confirm). AI risks over-reliance (2025 research), but history shows adaptation: writing birthed philosophy, not memory loss. AI could expand cognition (per experts like Jara-Ettinger). |
| 6. The "Great Deception," Believers Relying on "Demons," and Free Will | AI is the biblical end-times trick, offering a "demon-provided apple" over God-given gifts, eroding free will. | The "great deception" (2 Thessalonians 2:11; Revelation) means false miracles, not tech—though some 2025 sermons call AI "demonic." This echoes old panics: printing presses (1400s) and electricity (1800s) were "Satan's work," yet amplified faith (e.g., Bible apps). AI doesn't strip free will; we choose tools, as with plows or prayer. It's a human-built aid, not a replacement for creativity. Rejecting tech risks isolation; history shows innovation as a divine gift (e.g., Aquinas on reason and faith). |
| Conclusion | The missive taps real fears about change but relies on shaky symbols and leaps. AI is a neutral tool, like fire or the wheel, reflecting our intents. History shows we tame "demons" (tech fears) with discernment. Faith and tech can coexist; AI's risks are openly debated. What's your take on a specific point? | |
Generated on September 24, 2025, 09:41 AM CDT
The United States developed Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicle (MIRV) technology primarily for the LGM-30G Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), the first MIRV-capable ICBM globally. MIRV allows a single missile to deploy multiple warheads (typically three for Minuteman III, each with a W62 warhead of ~170 kilotons yield), each independently targeted, enhancing counterforce capabilities against hardened targets and countering anti-ballistic missile (ABM) defenses. Development began in the mid-1960s, with the first successful MIRV test in 1968.
| Date | Event | Type | Details | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1965 | Mark 18 RV study completed | Component/Partial | Proposed 7 lightweight RVs (150 lb each) for Minuteman II; early MIRV feasibility study. | |
| April 1965 | MIRV proposed for Minuteman | Development Milestone | Initial concept for counterforce targeting of hardened silos. | |
| July 1965 | Minuteman III development begins | Program Start | Focused on MIRV integration; third stage enlarged for payload. | |
| 1966 | Decision to enlarge third stage | Design Milestone | Enabled MIRV bus; key enabler for multiple RVs. | |
| August 16, 1968 | First Minuteman III launch (Silo 32, Cape Kennedy) | Full Launch (Non-MIRV) | Successful flight from flatpad; no MIRV payload, but validated booster stages. Preceded Poseidon C3X launch by hours. | |
| Late 1968 | First true MIRV flight test | Full MIRV Test | Successful dispensing of multiple RVs; proved independent targeting. Exact date not declassified, but confirmed as 1968 milestone. | |
| 1968–1969 | Series of development flights | Partial/Full Tests | 17 Minuteman III tests at Cape Kennedy; included PSRE maneuvers and RV separation. | |
| December 29, 1970 | First operational Minuteman III squadron (741st SMS, Minot AFB) | Deployment | MIRV-equipped; full capability proven via prior tests. | |
| April 1970–January 1977 | Full deployment | Operational Milestone | 550 missiles deployed; all MIRV-capable. | |
| 1970s | 7-MIRV tests | Partial Test | Explored higher payload; not deployed due to treaties. | |
| 2001–2014 | De-MIRVing | Treaty Compliance | Reduced to single RV (W78/W87); last MIRV removed June 16, 2014 (Malmstrom AFB). | |
| Ongoing (e.g., Aug 16, 2022; Feb 19, 2025; May 21, 2025) | Operational tests | Non-MIRV | Unarmed single-RV launches from Vandenberg SFB; ~300 total since 1970 for readiness. |
MIRV proved transformative but destabilizing, prompting SALT/START limits. Current Minuteman IIIs are single-RV; the LGM-35 Sentinel (2030 IOC) may revisit MIRV options.
The separation mechanism in ICBM Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicles (MIRVs) relies on simple, reliable mechanical principles: a post-boost vehicle (bus) uses pyrotechnic charges, springs, or gas generators to sequentially or simultaneously eject multiple reentry vehicles (RVs), ensuring independent trajectories with minimal failure risk in extreme environments. This "one-shot" simplicity—low mass, high reliability, and precise control—mirrors applications in other sectors where components must be rapidly and accurately separated under stress, without complex electronics.
| Industry | Example Application | Description and Similarity to MIRV Separation | Key Benefits and Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aerospace & Space Exploration | Rocket Stage Separation and Satellite Dispensers | Pyrotechnic explosive bolts or linear cutters (e.g., frangible joints) sever connections between rocket stages or release multiple satellites from a dispenser. Like MIRV, a single command triggers rapid, simultaneous ejection of components into independent orbits, using shock-minimized pyro devices for zero-failure in vacuum/high-vibration. NASA's systems deploy fairings, antennas, and payloads via gas generators and detonators, tested under pyroshock conditions akin to reentry stresses. | Reliability in one-shot ops (99.9% success); used in 100+ missions. Explosive bolts enable lightweight, fail-safe separation vs. mechanical alternatives. |
| Automotive Safety Systems | Airbag Inflators and Seatbelt Pretensioners | Pyrotechnic actuators use gas-generating explosives to inflate airbags or tension seatbelts in milliseconds, ejecting/releasing components (e.g., fabric or spool locks) with precise force. Mirrors MIRV's pyro-initiated RV release: rapid energy burst separates/positions safety elements independently, ensuring occupant protection in crashes. Battery disconnects use similar cutters for electrical isolation. | Deploys in <50ms; integral since 1970s, reducing fatalities by 30%. Automotive pyro devices transform explosive energy into linear motion for ejection. |
| Manufacturing & Injection Molding | Ejector Pins and Spring-Loaded Plungers | Spring-loaded pins or plungers in molds eject solidified parts post-cooling, applying consistent force to separate components without damage. Analogous to MIRV's spring-assisted RV dispersion: stored energy provides controlled, repeatable separation of multiple parts in sequence, ideal for high-volume production under thermal/pressure stress. Ball plungers index and lock workpieces during assembly. | Improves cycle times by 20-50%; used in 80% of plastic molding ops. Ensures precise positioning like MIRV targeting. |
| Defense & Ordnance (Non-Missile) | Payload Release from Airframes and Flares | Pyrotechnic piston actuators eject flares or ordnance from aircraft, using explosive charges for linear push/separation. Similar to MIRV bus: compact, lightweight mechanism releases multiple dispensable items independently, with ridge-cut bolts minimizing debris in high-G environments. | High-force output (up to 10kN); deployed in military aircraft for decoy release. |
| Mining & Demolition | Blasting Caps and Explosive Release Mechanisms | Pyrotechnic detonators initiate controlled separation of rock faces or structures via explosive bolts in mining rigs. Echoes MIRV simplicity: sequential pyro chain ejects fragments independently, using low-noise devices for precision in confined spaces. | Enhances safety in underground ops; reduces vibration by 40% vs. traditional blasts. |
These applications demonstrate the versatility of MIRV-like separations: pyrotechnics dominate high-stakes, one-time uses (aerospace/automotive), while springs suit repetitive industrial tasks. Challenges like shock mitigation and miniaturization are addressed via finite element analysis and testing, much like MIRV development. Future trends include non-pyro alternatives (e.g., shape-memory alloys) for sustainability, but mechanical basics remain foundational.
Good news.
Kamala’s rising STAR, Ms. Drummand to a dubbing. Just yesterday she was a rising star. Lmao.
The FLCC list of doctors is good but too small. We need a bigger, sanctioned network.
Can you explain?
Katie arrested!? Nnnnooo!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
