That would be corruption and would be prosecuted against the persons awarding such a contract. USA is in the process of policing this kind of activity now since it is rampant, often based on a small payoff to the executive/procurement officer awarding the contract.
I assume you're joking about this. How can it be corrupt if the contract is awarded based on "pragmatic" government policy instead of bribes paid to individuals?
Anyone who thinks this kind of arrangement is a good idea should ask yourselves if you'd be comfortable with a similar arrangement involving: (1) a Democratic president, and (2) a company like Pfizer instead of Intel.
Prosecuted? By whom? Does our FedGov have a long standing track record of correcting itself?
Put down the devil’s lettuce and go outside for a while until your thinking clears up...