Skip to comments.
A commuter college thought it could avoid Trump’s education crackdown. Here’s what happened
AP News ^
| Updated 9:41 AM CDT, August 23, 2025
| BYRON TAU
Posted on 08/23/2025 2:45:40 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (AP) — Administrators at the state university’s campus in Colorado Springs thought they stood a solid chance of dodging the Trump administration’s offensive on higher education.
Located on a picturesque bluff with a stunning view of Pikes Peak, the school is far removed from the Ivy League colleges that have drawn President Donald Trump’s ire. Most of its students are commuters, getting degrees while holding down full-time jobs. Students and faculty alike describe the university, which is in a conservative part of a blue state, as politically subdued, if not apolitical.
That optimism was misplaced.
An Associated Press review of thousands of pages of emails from school officials, as well as interviews with students and professors, reveals that school leaders, teachers and students soon found themselves in the Republican administration’s crosshairs, forcing them to navigate what they described as an unprecedented and haphazard degree of change.
Whether Washington has downsized government departments, clawed back or launched investigations into diversity programs or campus antisemitism, the University of Colorado-Colorado Springs has confronted many of the same challenges as elite universities across the nation.
The school lost three major federal grants and found itself under investigation by the Trump’s Education Department. In the hopes of avoiding that scrutiny, the university renamed websites and job titles, all while dealing with pressure from students, faculty and staff who wanted the school to take a more combative stance.
“Uncertainty is compounding,” the school’s chancellor told faculty at a February meeting, according to minutes of the session. “And the speed of which orders are coming has been a bit of a shock.”
The college declined to make any administrators available to be interviewed. A spokesman asked the AP to make clear that any professors or students interviewed in this story were speaking for themselves...
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
TOPICS: Education; Local News
KEYWORDS: colorado; dei; education
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
The school lost three major federal grants and found itself under investigation by the Trump’s Education Department. In the hopes of avoiding that scrutiny, the university renamed websites and job titles... The article is clear as mud, but my guess is they tried to maintain their DEI garbage by changing what they called it.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I believe it is intentionally vague.
Were we to know the details, it would probably give the lie to the article’s assertion that that the school is “politically subdued, if not apolitical.”
2
posted on
08/23/2025 2:49:37 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I do believe PDJT was clear about not re-titling positions to hide the continued DEI.
3
posted on
08/23/2025 2:50:58 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(First, I was a clinger, then deplorable, now I'm garbage. Feel the love? )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I’m glad propagandist Byron Tau of the AssPress is on the job letting us know how bad Orange Man is.
It must have been a good 4 years sleep when AutoPen Joe was sniffing little girls and cr@pping his pants.
4
posted on
08/23/2025 2:54:58 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
he university renamed websites and job titles, Shady characters trying to pull a gast one. Somebody at the school should be going to jail; probably multiple somebodys.
5
posted on
08/23/2025 2:55:48 PM PDT
by
Bernard
(Issue an annual budget. And Issue a federal government balance sheet. Let's see what we got.)
To: Bernard
fast one. Sometimes the enter key works too well.
6
posted on
08/23/2025 2:57:33 PM PDT
by
Bernard
(Issue an annual budget. And Issue a federal government balance sheet. Let's see what we got.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“The grants...cultural preservation and boosting women in technology fields.”
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Do you think the AP might tell us what grants were lost and why?!
8
posted on
08/23/2025 2:58:32 PM PDT
by
Rummyfan
( In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man.👨 )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Promises made... Promises kept...
Tiresome but enjoyable...
All these stinking communists need to: “Embrace the suck!”
9
posted on
08/23/2025 2:59:15 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
A country that’s $37 trillion in debt shouldn’t be handing out grants.
Colleges like Harvard have billions in their endowment.
If the research doesn’t seem likely to pay off better than Wall Street, place the plan in the circular file.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
11
posted on
08/23/2025 3:21:33 PM PDT
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“elections have consequences”
Barack Obama-January 2009
12
posted on
08/23/2025 3:23:41 PM PDT
by
READINABLUESTATE
(‘Never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals’)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
dodging the Trump administration’s offensive on higher education.
Hardly the "offensive" is against DEI so that higher education can take place.
13
posted on
08/23/2025 3:41:18 PM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
To: Brian Griffin
Agreed. Get rid of federal money for colleges, universities, and trade schools. If states want to pay for public colleges that's their business. If the federal govt got out of it, the price of tuition and books would go waaayyyy down to intrinsic levels. That means college would cost what it's worth. If the degree is little better than toilet paper, students will pay little for it.
But if it's a good major in a good college (at least if the college is good for that major), then students and parents and maybe employers will still pay decent money for it. No govt money would mean prices would be based on supply and demand.
14
posted on
08/23/2025 3:42:06 PM PDT
by
Tell It Right
(1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: Tell It Right
No govt money would mean prices would be based on supply and demand.Yep. By getting rid of fed money in higher education.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I smell leftist propaganda. “See how bad the Trump administration is? They’re like a bull in a china shop, destroying even schools that have done nothing wrong!”
To: NonValueAdded
[I do believe PDJT was clear about not re-titling positions to hide the continued DEI...]
DEI in Illinois public schools are alive and well.
17
posted on
08/23/2025 3:53:50 PM PDT
by
stars & stripes forever
(Blessed is the nation whose GOD is the LORD. ~ Psalm 33:12)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Trump administration’s offensive on higher education. “
AP - read no further.
18
posted on
08/23/2025 3:55:03 PM PDT
by
iamgalt
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Politically subdued looks like it means you have leftist ideas and practices about dei but don’t anyone to know about it.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Trump administration’s ‘offensive’ on higher education”
Please.
20
posted on
08/23/2025 6:28:11 PM PDT
by
dljordan
(The Rewards of Tolerance are Treachery and Betrayal)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson