Posted on 08/12/2025 4:54:11 AM PDT by Cronos
Claire Hope from Vancouver has just turned 18. Her mother is a real-estate agent, her father a lawyer. Last week, Claire reportedly made more than $1 million in less than three hours, after announcing the launch of her OnlyFans “bday special” on Instagram with a picture of herself sticking her middle fingers up at the camera. She wears a cropped t-shirt embroidered with the phrase “porn star in training”, promising “all content shot at 12.01am on my 18th birthday”. Claire first became famous as a sweary child rapper on YouTube, performing under the name Lil Tay. It is this persona, a nine-year-old schoolgirl in a puffer jacket waving around wads of cash, which the buyers of her OnlyFans will best recall.
Tia Billinger is 26 and from Nottinghamshire. She didn’t know her dad growing up and was raised by a stepdad. She married young and took up a job in financial recruitment for the NHS. Earlier this year, she was reportedly making around $250,000 a month from OnlyFans under the nom de guerre Bonnie Blue. In June, she was banned from the platform. Blue is a PR nightmare and a pornographer’s dream.
... For milquetoast feminists.. it is the “stigmatisation” of “sex workers” that kills them. In reality, it is male pornographers, clients and pimps who grip women’s necks, pump them with sedatives, and grind their personhood into the mud.
(Excerpt) Read more at unherd.com ...
Explain this please? Every STEM employer I know still focuses on hiring females first, no matter the skill level.
Bonnie Blue is digusting. Think how bad you got to be to get banned from Only Fans.
I am given to understand that we're already there. That hot chick you're (not you personally) massively simping over may very well be an AI driven CGI movie, one of dozens, being operated by some fat, greasy, unwashed, long stringy haired creep in cheeto-stained boxers and t-shirt, living in his mother's basement ...
eeeewwww ....
I guess I don’t understand how that would work.
Do you think the girls have managers or lawyers or something who they are giving big chunks of money to who are then feeding the money back to the original funders?
I was thinking that it is more of a system like “Radio Free Europe” where they are putting out the content and supporting a platform to create a desired social outcome.
I believe that since its inception, pornography has been a weapon that was used to intentionally destroy White Christian men.
I know how domain URLs and IP addresses work. If a .com URL resolves to an IP address that contains explicit adult content then have laws to hold the owner accountable.
Sure, you can always know the specific IP address (without knowing the URL) - but registering a domain to that address can be monitored and made accountable. All laws have ways around them but that isn’t an excuse to not have them.
For most kids and parents, this would be the fastest and 90% effective approach. It’s no different than laws that required video rental stores to have private areas for adult movies (and yes, kids could likely still wander in but at least there’s an effort to hide). I absolutely disagree that it wouldn’t be effective for the vast majority of households.
When people start going to jail or paying heavy fines, they’d comply. For the average kid and parents it’d go a long way. You’ll never stop those determined enough - but not trying is not good enough.
We’ve had laws that defined them well enough for video stores and magazines. If you’re a minor they’re out-of-bounds. “Hardcore porn” is easy to define.
Haven’t we always expected, at a societal level, to have laws protecting kids from unscrupulous adults?
Yes.
The woman gets her cut. The manager gets his cut. The government gets their cut. The rest goes back to the launderer.
"See, if you look at the drug war from a purely economic point of view, the role of the government is to protect the drug cartel. That's literally true." ― Milton Friedman
Yes, because the store is within a jurisdiction - the same jurisdiction that can regulate operating hours, parking, maximum number of occupants, etc.
Once it goes online, jurisdiction becomes an issue and the same methodology for restricting pornography will be used to restrict access to information about anything. We witnessed it with globalist operatives in the employ of United States agencies restricting information on Twitter, Facebook, and other social media platforms in order to overthrow the election of 2020. We witnessed people de-platformed for simply citing what Ivermectin was already prescribed for.
AMEN!
Sadly, it's human nature and has always been that way.
That's why the moral law of man or written laws is not an effective answer. The only answer is to be convicted by a higher power. For me, it's God Almighty of the Holy Bible, Creator of heaven and earth and all therein.
“For me, it’s God Almighty of the Holy Bible, Creator of heaven and earth and all therein.”
-
+1......how people navigate this fallen world without Jesus is beyond my understanding.
I support banning smartphones until one is 18. We don’t let kids drink or smoke
(Babylon Bee, of course)
Who owns OF?
Just googled it
OnlyFans is owned by Leonid Radvinsky. He is the sole owner of Fenix International Limited, the parent company of OnlyFans. Radvinsky acquired OnlyFans in 2018. Recent reports indicate he is exploring a sale of the platform for approximately $8 billion.
OnlyFans was created by Tim Stokely. He founded the platform in November 2016, initially as a way for creators to monetize their content through subscriptions. Stokely also served as the platform’s CEO until 2021.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.