[McGruff]

You use Wikipedia to provide your causality numbers, that’s a joke.

Trump should fire whoever is giving him causality number. They don’t match anything from the on the ground reports. Don’t you think Ukraine would be touting these supposed numbers.

[kiryandil]

You use Wikipedia to provide your causality numbers, that’s a joke.

He's a joke.

Carefully constructed Walls O' Text with joke data from Wikipedia.

I Wonder why the Russians had 6,000 dead Ukie bodies from Kursk?

Why are the Ukies running out of soldiers?

[BroJoeK]

McGruff: "You use Wikipedia to provide your causality numbers, that’s a joke."

Ukraine's daily Russian losses report:

Wikipedia compiles estimates from several international sources including the US, UK, UN, EU, BBC, Ukraine & others.
They all more-or-less match Ukrainian numbers, with the only major outlier being Russian government propaganda.

So, if you are taking Russian propaganda seriously, then the joke's on you, FRiend.

McGruff: "Trump should fire whoever is giving him causality number.
They don’t match anything from the on the ground reports.
Don’t you think Ukraine would be touting these supposed numbers."

No doubt, Trump's numbers are compilations from DNI, CIA, DIA, NSA & others.
And, in fact, they do well match with those from Ukraine and other western sources.
The great disparity between Russian and Ukrainian battlefield deaths is a reflection of both Russian "meat wave" assault tactics and Russia's corresponding indifference to medical care for wounded troops.

Ukrainians publish their estimates of Russian casualties daily.
They announce their own deaths from time to time.

But, if all you see is Russian propaganda, you won't know anything about that.