
I guess for Amy Sherald, only the rich should come to the U.S.
To: nickcarraway
Forgive me, but I see no more controversy over an Amy Sherald painting of the Statue of Liberty than I would a pre-school crayon drawing.
It it was my child or grandchild, I'd probably display in on my fridge with a magnet. Otherwise, I would probably just throw it away as the tawdry doodle that it is.
2 posted on
08/01/2025 11:17:44 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(The politicized state destroys many aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
To: nickcarraway
Her work is literally “flat”, devoid of dimension and depth, and lacking in talent.
But for the woke political message, it’s something a six-grader would paint and would not merit mention.
3 posted on
08/01/2025 11:21:03 AM PDT by
MeanWestTexan
(Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
To: nickcarraway
4 posted on
08/01/2025 11:26:22 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: nickcarraway
Left wingers don’t give a damn about the US Constitution, but they’ll point to the inscription on a gifted French-made statue as if it is holy scripture. As much of a beloved landmark that it is, I sometimes wonder if we wouldn’t be just as well off without that false idol existing to give excuses for those trying to destroy the country through demographic replacement.
5 posted on
08/01/2025 1:23:01 PM PDT by
fr_freak
(So foul a sky clears not without a storm.)
To: nickcarraway
The meaning of platitudes, which the poem on the plate absolutely is full of.
8 posted on
08/01/2025 2:53:55 PM PDT by
Sirius Lee
("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
To: nickcarraway
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson