Presumption of innocence extends to people investigated but not charged yes? We might know their names from flight logs but might not see them charged without some conclusive proof of guilt and if witnesses are willing to testify and if it is not statute time barred from prosecution.
My assumption is that the Left has been manipulated into calling for this release without really knowing what they are asking for. I assume that President Trump has a good idea what is there and will approve DOJ to release info at the appropriate legal and psychological moment.
I think that the main show right now should be the CIA/FBI/HRC/Soros grand conpiracy.
Re: EPSTEIN|And all the stupid memos we were given to defend Against transparency, spread by Pam were elementary. Just for insisting on relief against a cover up, and for release of the ghastly files on Epstein, to either confirm or dismiss rumors of sado-masochist books found by the FBI, or for using his own sperm to make his own gene pool. Gasp.
I must say, I do find Trump’s casual turn-arounds from his exercised turn-abouts, issued expressly following his material directives, to be increasingly bizarre.
POTUS is For it, then furiously Against it, only to be writing that he is For it, again.
The same thing happens with dates and deadlines, with sanctions, first on and then off, or visa versa, off and then on, nations and leaders are publicly in the pink with him, and then publicly right back out in the dark. Senators are publicly favored with garlands of generosity in words, then publicly eviscerated.
I don’t know what a sound mind makes of this reign of obviously fluctuating behavior. How to dare depend on one’s own integrity when defending chameleon declarations.
I think there is a name for it, but it is not 3-5G Chess.
+ + +
Masterfully coordinated by our President and Elon Musk.
The Left expects, or rather is convinced, PDJT will be among the guilty.
In reality, it will be all their heroes.
(Our side will probably take a few hits, though not PDJT. We can handle it.)