Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/31/2025 10:54:06 AM PDT by CDR Kerchner
" ... Barack Obama’s Social Security number is our equivalent of the Rosetta Stone, although still undeciphered, and long overdue. Everything about him starts with his unexplainable use of a phony Social Security number, issued on March 28, 1977, to someone born in 1890 in Connecticut. Obama was fifteen years old then and in school in Hawaii. ..." continue reading at: https://susandaniels.substack.com/p/barack-obama-and-the-rosetta-stone
(Excerpt) Read more at susandaniels.substack.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
CDR Kerchner (Ret) http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org
A then-new Social Security number was issued to me as a teenager, just like obama.
However, it is an Arizona number as it should be!
Yes, I was born in 1950 and did not need an SSN until I got a paid job in 1969.
Excellent article at the link.
No paywall...just lots of information raising serious questions.
The Øbama illegalities may have surpassed even Sloe Xoe’s.
Yes, excellent research and reporting by Susan Daniels, Licensed PI in Ohio.
And a key point that should be noted, although not mentioned in her article, is that Obama probably has continued to use that stolen SSN including using it to file his federal income taxes. Likewise, his continued use of his forged Hawaii birth documents resets the statue of limitations each year. Thus every year and time he uses it, the statue of limitations is restarted. Here is an example of Obama using that stolen SSN from CT from back in the year 2009: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/proof-obama-uses-stolen-connecticut-ssn-obama-2009-irs-tax-return-cdr-kerchners-blog/
Snopes is a very leftish site, but they may be on the right track:
Why Barack Obama's Social Security card application might have included a Connecticut mailing address is something of a curiosity, as he had no known connection to that state at the time, but by itself that quirk is no indicator of fraud. The most likely explanation for the discrepancy is a simple clerical or typographical error: the ZIP code in the area of Honolulu where Barack Obama lived at the time he applied for his Social Security number in 1977 is 96814, while the ZIP code for Danbury, Connecticut, is 06814. Since '0' and '9' are similarly shaped numbers and are adjacent on typewriter keyboards, it's not uncommon for handwritten examples to be mistaken for each other, or for one to be mistyped as the other (thereby potentially resulting in a Hawaiian resident's application mistakenly being routed as if it had originated from Connecticut).
“Moreover, the Social Security Administration has stated in writing that SSN 042-68-4425 was not issued to Barack Obama.”
Is there a link to where this was stated in writing?
@realDonaldTrump @KristiNoem @PamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @dbongino @Bannons_WarRoom Obama using SSN stolen from dead person in CT since 1980’s. He also continues to use forged identity birth docs. Each year he uses them resets “Statue of Limitations”. DOJ should use that vector to investigate, arrest, and put Obama on trial for identity fraud.
Suggest you contact Susan Daniels with your question. You can contact her via her contact details for her newsletter via the link to her newsletter article I provided with the excerpt. Ask her your questions directly.
“Suggest you contact Susan Daniels with your question.”
I quoted your blog, not her stack
It’s at the start of the second from bottom paragraph.
When she went to the family apartment, Lasseter and his parents were gone and another family was living there. To this day, nobody has seen or heard from the three of them.
-PJ
If one wishes to, just read the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three. Then, read Article II where the qualifications for President begin with two very important words, “No Person”. Then apply what you’ve just read to the fact that we have yet to see a legitimate birth certificate for Obama. You will have just PROVED that he was NEVER a legal President and that the ENTIRE Congress allowed him to usurp the office for EIGHT years. Our totally corrupt Congress then allowed a near vegetable to illegally act as President after a STOLEN election that went unchallenged. The problem isn’t in the White House. The problem is on Capitol Hill.
Read more carefully. What is posted in my blog today is an excerpt of Susan Daniel’s article with a link to the complete article. So again, ask Susan your questions.
Read more carefully. My source for that 2009 article was information from the private investigator, Susan Daniels. Again, contact her. She is the leading expert regarding Obama’s use of an SSN stolen from a dead person from Connecticut.
Sorry for the typo. That article in my blog link was posted in 2011 about Obama’s 2009 tax return reveal. Again, though, contact Susan Daniels regarding the details of her contacts with the Social Security Administration.
When Obama was an Illinois legislator about the run for US Senate and before the Chicago Newspapers torpedoed Ryan by getting a sympathetic judge to unseal his divorce records, he was being interviewed by a Chicago radio station. The question of “higher office” was brought up, seemingly in jest by the interviewer. Obama made a reference to being ineligible by virtue of his birth and they immediately moved on to another subject. Somehow, that interview which I recall quite well was lost to journalistic history and likely Democrat shenanigans. His birth certificate fiasco was obviously fraud perpetrated by someone not very good at faking documents (photoshop and layers were not a thing back when he was born in the 60s) but the willing press was not interested and the Republicans did not have the gonads to push the narrative. I believe it was Hillary that began the conversation but McCain was too RINO to push the issue.
The first three numbers determine where you were born? Or is it age of issue?
Me, 1959. Only got one at 18. No need for my part time high school job.
And didn’t it have African American listed as race? That wasn’t a term used in the 60s.
The article that you posted at your blog today does reference Susan’s article.
But the blog post from 2011 that you linked to in comment 10 does not reference Susan (at least I can’t find it)
That was where I took the quote from. Though I can understand if you can’t remember the source for an article from 2011
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.