Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Openurmind
Also, to submit as evidence any video, a specific person must have personal knowledge of how that video was recorded, and testify to the authenticity of that video.”

The in-court testimony would have to wait until trial, but the identification of the video custodian and authentication would happen pre-trial.

63 posted on 07/28/2025 8:06:41 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin

“The in-court testimony would have to wait until trial, but the identification of the video custodian and authentication would happen pre-trial.”

Do you actually think LE and DAs even care whether they have “solid forensic evidence” or not before arresting you? Not anymore, “looks like him” is enough and they arrest you and say “let the courts figure it out”. You are guilty before you prove your innocence, they are not going to do any work to make sure you are not guilty before they arrest you. It doesn’t work that way anymore. You being innocent is the very last thing they care about because there is no longer any accountability for wrongful arrests. “False Arrest” is now a completely obsolete concept. No skin off their nose if they were wrong...


66 posted on 07/28/2025 8:16:45 AM PDT by Openurmind (AI - An Illusion for Aptitude Intrusion to Alter Intellect. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson