To: BenLurkin
The developers stored users IDs (driver license images) in an unprotected directory.
9 posted on
07/27/2025 7:29:55 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(Your enemies will not care about your "rights". They will violate them and sleep soundly at night.)
To: PapaBear3625
The developers stored users IDs (driver license images) in an unprotected directory.
When “Vibe Coding” goes wrong. We’re going to start seeing a lot of this with AI-generated code.
13 posted on
07/27/2025 7:38:32 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: PapaBear3625
“driver license images”
That’s even worse than mug shots!
To: PapaBear3625
> The developers stored users IDs (driver license images) in an unprotected directory.
Worse than that. They stored the private data they claimed to be erasing on an open website. No effort to hack, no protection from accidental exposure, no clear intention of protecting the data because they made no effort to do so.
I don’t even think it was due to “vibe coding”, looks like a toy prototype deployed without any consideration.
!!!!!
39 posted on
07/27/2025 10:04:05 AM PDT by
no-s
(Caja del Orador, Caja de Papeletas, Caja del Jurado, Caja de Cartuchos ... ya sabes cómo va...)
To: PapaBear3625
“This is what happens when you entrust your personal information to a bunch of … DEI hires.” The site left women's drivers licenses publicly available on the Internet.
Ouch!
40 posted on
07/27/2025 10:05:31 AM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: PapaBear3625
I just read the next-to-last line. 🤣
46 posted on
07/27/2025 12:32:22 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson