“never envisioned high speed automatic printing presses”
Yes, the same illogic used to attack the 2nd amendment can just as easily be applied to the others.
The emotional “argument” 2A detractors make with questions like “So you think people should have nuclear weapons?” should always be answered in kind.
The fact that technology has evolved to create a scenario not originally envisioned, or for which the constricts of the enumerated powers do not provide “adequate” controls, does not, therefore, give license to government tyrants to forever act in the breach to restrict the so-called danger. They must amend the constitution, or pass legislation in keeping with the powers granted them.
But this they will not do. To take away 2A rights through judicial fiat, administrative burdens, etc., also make it far easier to eliminate other rights under the same pretexts.
The possibility and potential for nuclear weapons, at least in the U.S., were raised by citizen academicians and scientists who were then retained and funded by government to develop them.
Nobody was ever killed by a nuclear weapons in the hands of private citizens. They only became dangerous and deadly when government took possession of them.