Let them drink their kool-aid in isolation.
Positive Aryan Theology?
There is in fact no subject upon which so much difference of opinion exists, not only among the unlearned but also among educated men; and the views entertained are so various and so discrepant, that, while it is no doubt a possible alternative that none of them is true, it is certainly impossible that more than one should be so.
Marcus Tullius Cicero, \\\"On the Nature of the Gods,\\\" 45 BC.
If it's one thing our movement has no shortage of, it's religious infighting.
How, then, do we reconcile our desire for a unified front of European families, with the hectic inter-religious atmosphere on the internet?
Our Policy In Short
RTTL officially supports a viewpoint of \\\"Positive Aryan Theology.\\\" Generally speaking, any serious religion (save obvious degeneracies like Satanism) borne by Our People(TM) is good enough for RTTL.
This can obviously bring petty disputes regarding which religions would qualify under this criteria. This is unimportant. The overall effect is that our somewhat-secular PMA umbrella is able to accommodate a wide variety of philosophies and bring our people together, without imposing a specific religion, and while prohibiting the religions of those who wish to extinguish us.
Historic Precedent
Throughout the 1600s and 1700s, a varied group of European Protestants, Catholics, Unitarians, and even a couple Deists came together to establish a land for our people . They established our first citizenship laws to restrict citizenship to Europeans of good moral character. Religions were largely separated by colony or region, but the society as a whole was both European and multi-religious.
More Historic Precedent
Back in the 1930s, an Austrian painter rose to power in Germany. Since he managed to enact major reforms that propelled his recently-defeated country to a world military superpower in less than a decade, we might be interested in what their official policy was on religion:
\\\"Positive Christianity\\\" was a form of Christianity that sought to blend German ideology with certain Christian beliefs. This movement rejected the contemporary claims of modern-day Jews that Jesus was Arabic, and promoted the idea of an Aryan Jesus.
But Germany at the time had plenty of Protestants, Catholics, and other denominations. How were these theological differences reconciled? In Point 24 of the 1920 NSDAP party platform, it states:
\\\"the Party as such represents the viewpoint of Positive Christianity without binding itself to any particular denomination\\\"
Thus, we see a successful example of a government maintaining a semi-secular status while still supporting a collection of religious denominations that most of the population followed.
Adapting Historical Policies to RTTL
The Inadequacy of 1770s United States Policy
Some would say that we should adopt the Founding Fathers' approach to religion. Unfortunately, they were too permissive. The genuine religious openness of some Founding Fathers to Muslims and Jews paved the way for acceptance of religions that are self-stated to be contrary to the existence of our people, and eventual mass immigration.
George Washington stated that he would allow Muslim and Jewish immigrants if they were \\\"good workmen\\\":
*\\\"If they are good workmen, they may be of Asia, Africa, or Europe. They may be Mahometans [Mohammedans/Muslims], Jews, or Christians of any Sect, or they may be Atheists.\\\"*
-George Washington, in a 1784 letter to Tench Tighman