[SMARTY]

It's an important literary and cultural benchmark if you want to comprehend history and the 'history of history'

To ask if it is relevant means you never read it

[Cronos]

I’ve read it and as I learnt more, have come to loathe it for giving wrong conclusions. Kinda like watching CNN that shows part of the truth and pushes the narrative in a completely wrong direction.

[Varda]

You are right, I didn’t read it largely because I wasn’t interested in picking through propaganda. I can see why someone would be interested in the (British version of) “history of history” but I am more interested in the evidence of historical events.