Posted on 07/22/2025 4:50:42 AM PDT by MtnClimber
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The only constitutionally authorized death penalty for actions against the nation involves treason. Treason is quite clearly defined along the lines of eating and a bedding and enemy of the United States. Since Congress has not declared war on any nation after December, 1941, it would be rather difficult to convict someone of treason. Sedition, or in this case, a seditious conspiracy, is another matter altogether. My understanding is that the maximum sentence for sedition or seditious conspiracy is 20 years. I am sure that there are other penalties that could be attached, such as loss of pension, and the civil suits that would come about in the aftermath of a conviction would break even the wealthiest of offenders.
By the way, even if these people were aiding China, and I would argue that anything that weakens this country aids China, we are not in a declared war against that nation, so treason is not operative. Unfortunately, that word is bandied about too freely, without people understanding that the judicial system not only does, but HAS to, mete out punishments in a very precise way, according to very specific definitions. If it doesn’t do that, then we end up with Star Chambers and the like.
*aiding and abetting
I really have to check Siri - it can’t transcribe easily understood English.
——Sedition, or in this case, a seditious conspiracy, is another matter altogether-—
That’s pretty much what I thought too.
I can’t see aiding and abetting an enemy in what was more along the lines of a conspiratorial coup.
Not at all what I was thinking it meant. (Lol, speech-to-text, gotta love it!)
”Since Congress has not declared war on any nation after December, 1941, it would be rather difficult to convict someone of treason.”
As I understand, treason is the only crime demanding the death penalty described in the constitution. Hmmm…maybe that is why war has not been “declared” in spite of executing “operations” that sure look like a war. Invoking the death penalty for the war pigs would interfere with their power structure, ie their ability to wage war and to profit from it.
Now, what about “The war on xxxx”. Can there be traitors to these actual declared “wars”, (poverty, drugs, terrorism) or are they somehow different?
Nuremberg them all. 5 minute tribunals, immediate executions.
Right you are but I am nt clear about this “eating and a bedding and enemy of...”
You and TTFlyer should spend some time learning words and definitions before you so blithely use them.
In view of my 50-year career in publishing, I'd say you need to develop a sense of humor.
By the way, your outrage at the widespread blurring of language definition is more than half a century behind the times. Prominent recent example: mural to describe a slogan painted on a street. Spellcheck error and definition creep are here to stay until A.I., with all its other pitfalls, starts cleaning up digital language production.
The Dawn of Digital Spell Checking (1959 to 1970s)
The Degradation of Language and Why We Should, Such as, Care (2010)
By dismantling its copy desk, The New York Times is making a mistake that’s been made before (2017)
Ping a ling...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.