Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 1Old Pro

From what I read in another thread over the weekend, it’s patently clear one of the pilots activated the fuel cutoff to both engines.

It’s an informed conclusion that the first officer is the likely culprit since he is charged instrument panel duties while the CO was preoccupied with piloting the aircraft during climb out. This opinion departs from recent news pointing fingers at the CO re his mental health following the death of his mother.

Stating the obvious: If the CO was flying the a/c and wanted to suicide himself with the a/c, all he had to do was go nose-down. Worse, the CVR allegedly contains a recording of one pilot asking the other why he cutoff the fuel, to which the other denies having done so. I would assert it was the FO who made the denial and that it was the CO who returned the switches to the run position. Assuming, of course, that the CO was flying the a/c (I have not seen that confirmed).

The passengers never had a chance at that altitude, nearly as effective as a bomb at cruising altitude.

Personally, I wonder if the jab played a role (ironically, India’s pilots demanded a jab mandate, the hysteria over there was so high).

I eagerly await the CVR and FDR details, as this crash places a heavy burden upon the airlines and regulatory authorities to prevent a repeat incident.


9 posted on 07/14/2025 1:10:44 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869

I’ve read similar, but have no idea if what I read was true.
The claim was that both engines had fuel shutoff within a certain number of secods. The report implied it seemed intentional, but maybe i’m reading into it.
Again I don’t know if i read was garbage or not


11 posted on 07/14/2025 1:37:44 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

It was established in the preliminary report that the First Officer was flying the plane at takeoff, with the Capitan observing.


12 posted on 07/14/2025 1:37:49 PM PDT by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869
It’s an informed conclusion that the first officer is the likely culprit since he is charged instrument panel duties while the CO was preoccupied with piloting the aircraft during climb out.

That is exactly backwards. The FO was flying the plane at takeoff, the PIC was monitoring.

14 posted on 07/14/2025 1:46:07 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

CO? Captain?

Who had the record of depression - the First Officer or the Captain?


15 posted on 07/14/2025 2:02:07 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

“It’s an informed conclusion that the first officer is the likely culprit since he is charged instrument panel duties while the CO was preoccupied with piloting the aircraft during climb out. “

Reports say the copilot was flying.


33 posted on 07/14/2025 6:31:27 PM PDT by TexasGator (1i.. logo About Issues Projects Products Connect Subscribe Invest June 19, 2025 | Insight '1-1111 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson