I would say she’d have the same problem implicating Trump that E Jean Carol had, namely that a busy guy like Trump has a diary and can show where he has been at any given time.. No one can say Trump was here or there without knowing what’s in that diary.
You mean the same E. Jean Carroll that won a $5 million judgement against Trump that was just upheld by a New York Appeals court?
In any case it doesn't matter what can be proven, it just matters that the allegations get recorded so that all of the talking heads on The View, on CNN, on MSNBC, etc., can just repeat the allegations and play the soundbite.
Average 'low information voter' will just remember hearing the allegations, not whether there was any truth to them.