Posted on 07/10/2025 10:27:52 AM PDT by Signalman
Famous lawyer and legal expert Alan Dershowitz revealed during an interview on pundit Sean Spicer’s program that he has seen the entire Epstein list and that the document is being suppressed to protect certain individuals.
“Documents are being suppressed to protect individuals. I know the names of the individuals. I know why they’re being suppressed. I know who’s suppressing them. But I’m bound by confidentiality,” he said.
This bombshell comes just 24 hours after both the FBI and the Department of Justice came out and said there is no “client list.”
According to a memo that came out on Wednesday, the DOJ and FBI confirmed, at least according to them, that infamous pedophile sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein did not keep a client list. The memo is allegedly the result of an investigation into the matter, which also concluded there is no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed powerful people.
It also goes on to reaffirm that Epstein died by suicide in his jail cell back in 2019.
On Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked during a press conference to clarify what happened to the client list that Attorney General Pam Bondi said several months ago was sitting on her desk.
Leavitt came to the defense of the FBI and DOJ, saying the Trump administration remains committed to locking up the “bad guys” and had already blown past the former administration in doing just that. She then said they are dedicated to speaking the truth and being transparent, which is why FBI Director Kash Patel and Bondi promised to investigate the files related to Epstein. “The materials that have not been released contain incredibly graphic child pornography, not appropriate for public consumption. Journalist Peter Doocy asked Leavitt about Pam Bondi’s exact statement that Jeffrey Epstein’s client list was sitting on her desk for review, but Leavitt said Bondi was referring to all the documents of the case, not particularly about the client list,” MSN reported.
The public was expecting to see the full Epstein client list, which many believed would be stacked with names of prominent individuals who visited the pedophile’s island and participated in sexual activity with underage girls. Trump’s administration promised it would provide full disclosure of the names of those involved in the sex trafficking operation.
“Bound by confidentiality, how?”
He didn’t say. But since he’s been a lawyer for the beautiful people for decades, you have to infer attorney client privilege.
“It’s really a non story.”
I hope folks buckle up for Epstein “non-stories” day after day after day after day...
You’re not in that position.
Why play fantasy and deal in the reality of the situation.
Maybe it’s none of anyone’s business.
“I could care less”
I couldn’t care less.
Wake me up when Dershowitz explains why none of the Client List women have filed a criminal complaint or civil lawsuit against the Client List men who sexually abused them.
Wake me up when Dershowitz explains why almost four dozen women fearlessly sued Epstein and Maxwell, and put them both in prison, while the Epstein Client List women are too timid to take any meaningful legal action at all.
I don't rely on guts. You've been on FR longer than I have, we rely on facts and logic, never emotion or fear and you know that.
I hope the rest of your day is blessed.
So don't be surprised when I call you and ask for cash.
“Her exact statement never said client list.”
You’re right; it didn’t. She was referring to the case files. At least, that’s how I took it. A list wasn’t mentioned.
The list I want to see is the one showing the payoffs to Senators’ and Representatives’ bimbos and the dollar amounts.
Doubt it Alan is just chumming the waters
Btw, before I sign out, the list that I actually want to see is the one that lists payments from Congress “slush/hush fund”. We never got that either.
Dershowitz was Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer.
Virginia Guiffrey, the woman who sued Prince Andrew, also publicly claimed that she had sex with Dershowitz.
Dershowitz instantly sued her for defamation.
Giuffrey instantly recanted and claimed mistaken identity.
“I don’t believe Trump is on the list”
Me, either. If it were, there would’ve been no need for Russiagate, a fake dossier, multiple concocted prosecutions, etc. RATs could’ve used this and taken him out in one fell swoop.
This is an interesting turn of events since the guy is/was a supporter of Trump.
Perhaps this is his final straw such as the one that was too much for Elon Musk to continue causing his outbursts.
The lawyer isn’t on the spectrum so he is handling it in a different way.
I don’t think that bond holds after the death of the client.
Uhh, sure you do.
One of the ways cops can quickly tell if someone is lying is they ask a simple question like:
“What is your name?”
Most people quickly answer and give their name.
The liars are the ones who answer another question that was not asked.
Watch CSPAN press conferences with that approach—and the lies are kinda easy to spot.
Alan Dershowitz
Perfect RX
My guess is that Donald Trump is in the files, in some capacity. He doesn’t want to go through all the legal hassle to prove that he is innocent of any sexual crime and probably many more in the files are not necessarily guilty of any crime but their names are somewhere in there. It would be a legal nightmare.
I think the files should be released anyway. Let the chips fall.
The duty of confidentiality and attorney-client privilege generally continue after the client’s death.
The personal representative of the estate controls the privilege and may waive it.
There are specific legal exceptions, especially in estate disputes, where privilege may not apply.
In Florida, these rules are codified, and exceptions are carefully circumscribed
Dersch was also a “party” to one of the lawsuits and could have knowledge via sealed files of that lawsuit meaning that only that judge could release Dersch to disclose under seal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.