Yep -- it was Obama

Over the last few years, I've asked myself the question: Why are the Democrats so bent on locking up Trump? They tried everything, from Russia hoaxes to unleashing Fani to sham trials in New York City to feeding friendly newsmen negative information about Trump.

For a while, I thought that it was the Supreme Court. In other words, they need judges to invent laws to implement what voters don't want. Or maybe it was abortion and this irrational idea that killing a baby is a woman's choice. Or maybe it was fear that a second Trump presidency would go after them the same way, i.e., payback New York streets style. Or maybe it was just a way of keeping their Trump Derangement Syndrome base busy with more addiction. Or maybe it was about protecting President Obama from something awful, such as directing a campaign to destroy his successor's presidency.

President Barack Obama. Not CIA Director John Brennan. Not Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. And not FBI Director James Comey. But President Barack Obama. The 44th president of the United States, directed the intelligence community to interfere in the peaceful transition of power to his successor -- Donald Trump. And for that Obama should forevermore be considered a pariah in presidential history.

Last week, CIA Director John Ratcliffe released the agency’s review of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on “Russia’s Influence Campaign Targeting the 2016 US Presidential Election.” The CIA’s review exposed extensive problems with “the procedures and analytic tradecraft employed” by the intelligence community in crafting the ICA, revealing at the same time the role Brennan, Clapper, and Comey played in the corrupt process.

Because the senior leaders are all political appointees-

Because they in turn hand pick the Senior Executive Schedules (SESs) which serve them-

It has always been the case that the government bureaucracy is political and does their masters bidding.

This is not new (article from 1975): https://www.nytimes.com/1975/12/04/archives/fbi-is-accused-of-political-acts-for-6-presidents-senate.html (FYI- back then the NYT’s was a factual and well reputable paper - not the liberal tabloid it has become today)

What was new under Obama, was just how far, to what EXTENT this bias and politization was taken. It was to the point where it was obvious and in part not even hidden anymore.

Mueller may have a bias, but you can’t really tell. His sense of professionalism, the need to be fair (objective and neutral) kept him within defined limits he refused to overstep.

However, with Comey there wasn’t even that attempt anymore - only lip service about professional standards.

He was anti-Trump, pro-Obama and Hillery, pro-left, pro-liberal causes, anti-conservative causes and he wove that into every decision made. It was a disgusting display and sadly only possible because today the American public has become desensitized and more accepting of such behavior. A highly biased and unprofessional MSM practices apologetics for this nonsense because they back anything the Democrats do, support, or say... You can have a Muslim communist saying some pretty outrageous antisemitic things and they’ll defend him too.

Hunters’ laptop-

Not prosecuting HRC for her server-

Running with the Russian collusion story (they knew it was BS but it justified what they WANTED to do)-

Claiming ANTIFA is an idea not an organization-

J6 and what was essentially a political purge, intimidation, and smear campaign-

What should have been an illegal FISA on Trump tower (obvious what they were doing, feeding HRC derogatory information she can use against Trump. Literally a Water Gate part II the media helped bury)-

Any one of these issues should have head caused heads to roll.

The fact that didn’t happen, except if forced from outside regards the FISA, is telling that these events were blessed off, probably even ordered by the most senior leaders in the organization (DOJ and FBI) but of course they will always have probable deniability or some faux justification not even a 9-year-old would believe as justification. The DOJ and FBI has a serious leadership problem, and I hope Patel can fix this.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.