For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

expose-news.com ^ | July 2, 2025 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

Neurological injuries from vaccination have been documented since the smallpox vaccine over two centuries ago, with severe injuries reported throughout medical literature.  The medical profession concealed these injuries, believing public vaccination benefits justified hiding information that might create vaccine hesitancy.

Historical injuries like spreading paralysis mirror current “one in a million” vaccine injuries, but toxicity documentation was erased to preserve the “safe and effective” narrative.

In the past, these injuries were widely reported, but now research into them is widely censored.  Many of these forgotten reports are critical for understanding modern “inexplicable” conditions like autism, A Midwestern Doctor writes.

The Hidden Tragedy of Neurological Vaccine Injuries

By A Midwestern Doctor, 25 June 2025

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Diagnostic Obfuscation
3. The Hazards of Immunisation
   1. Typhoid Vaccine
   2. Yellow Fever
   3. Rabies
   4. Measles
   5. Vaccine Caused “Polio”
   6. Diphtheria
   7. Pertussis
   8. Smallpox
   9. Vaccine Injury Susceptibility
   10. Vaccine-Induced Micro-strokes
4. Conclusion
5. About the Author

Introduction

Author’s Note: In the US, the requirement to vaccinate is largely based on the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices’ (“ACIP’s”) assessment (and the CDC’s) that the vaccine’s benefits outweigh its risks. Due to the dogmatic faith surrounding vaccination and ACIP’s members having massive conflicts of interest favouring vaccination, virtually every vaccine put before them ends up on the schedule and as a result, each generation of (sicker) children gets even more of them.

A key reason for this is because only a small set of injuries are tested for (typically those that are minor or very rare) and hence officially “exist,” while the much broader gamut of vaccine injuries are swept under the rug. Today, due to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s (“RFK’s”) bold action to replace ACIP’s members, a very different committee will have its first meeting today. For that reason, I felt it was important to highlight one major complication of vaccines: the widespread neurological injuries they cause.

From birth, we are taught that vaccines were one of the most remarkable discoveries in history, and were so safe and effective that many now unimaginable plagues vanished with few to no side effects occurring in the process. In truth, give or take, every part of that mythology is false, and remarkably similar vaccine disasters occur every few decades.

Much of this results from the fact that it is very difficult to produce safe vaccines due to both their mode of action and the methods used in their production. As such, the best “solution” which could be found to this problem was to insist in lockstep that vaccines were safe and erase any memory that vaccine disasters had in fact occurred, thereby making it possible to gaslight anyone who was severely injured by a vaccine and claim their injury was just anecdotal or a product of anti-vaccine hysteria.

For example, recently I discussed how vaccines cause autism and focused on a central argument used to debunk the link between the two – that the only reason people believe vaccines cause autism is because a disgraced British doctor published a fraudulent 1998 study claiming they did and then made everyone start hallucinating that vaccine injuries were occurring.

This mythology, however, ignores that brain injuries were a longstanding problem of vaccination. For example, a 1982 NBC news programme revealed that many parents were having children develop “post-pertussis encephalopathy” after taking the DPT vaccine for diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough) and tetanus, and that most doctors refused to report this.

ransomnote: video available on the linked webpage

If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on BitChute HERE or Odysee HERE.

To quote that programme:

Medical knowledge about severe reactions to the whooping cough vaccine goes back to the early 1930s. Report after report has been published in medical journals since then. In 1948, two American doctors reported on case histories of many children who had been brain-damaged or died from DPT vaccines in Boston. The following year, another doctor surveyed paediatricians across the country and found still more. Those studies have been forgotten.

Likewise, in 1985, one of the most popular talk shows in America, ‘The Phil Donahue Show’, hosted a segment where doctors from both sides (and neurologically injured members of the audience) debated the risks and benefits of vaccination and the ethics of mandates. To the best of my knowledge, this was the last time an open debate of vaccination aired on mainstream television. [You can watch the full 45-minute The Phil Donahue Show on Substack HERE or on Odysee HERE.]

Diagnostic Obfuscation

In both of these 1980s TV programmes and many of the earlier studies on vaccine injuries, the brain damaged children were described as becoming “mentally retarded” or “severely retarded.” However, in the 1990s, “retarded” began to be phased out due to it being deemed too stigmatising, with Barack Obama signing a law in 2010 that replaced all instances in Federal statutes of “mentally retarded” and “mental retardation” with “intellectual disability.”

This is important as it is commonly argued that the increase in autism is not due to an environmental toxin (e.g., vaccines) but rather more and more “normal” things being reclassified as autism. One of the primary studies that supported the reclassification argument is a 2009 study from California that actually showed 26.4% of children who had previously been diagnosed as “mentally retarded” became “autistic” (as did another commonly cited study).

Since autism is deliberately undefined, it encapsulates both profound (severe) autism (25-30% of cases) and autistic traits (e.g., having manageable neurological deficits or “being on the spectrum”). This wordplay hence blends them together, making it possible to slander statements on severe autism while simultaneously tricking people into believing the increase is actually just in autistic quirks.

MORE AT THE LINK: https://expose-news.com/2025/07/02/neurological-damage-from-vaccines/ 

[metmom]

That doesn’t negate their strong immune systems.

I knew a missionary doctor couple many years ago who told me that. They told me they’d see people walking around with infections that would have killed any one of us long ago.

Additionally, it’s well known even here that the immune system not getting the practice it needs when it needs it is contributing to many health issues today, particularly the rise in allergies.

[Delta 21]

200 years of medical nomenclature and alls we got was this stinking shirt.

[Delta 21]

IVERMECTIN at the ready, sir!

[normbal]

Here’s one for you: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20250625/Missing-gut-bacteria-in-US-babies-triples-allergy-and-eczema-risk.aspx?utm_source=news_medical_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=allergy_newsletter_3_july_2025

I knew this as long ago as Y2K. I’d seen this effect in MANY MANY children as well as adults in people who had chronic sinusitis, asthma, allergies/eczema who, per history, had HAD many many ear infections or other infections treated with antibiotics very early in life.

This is a known issue. It is also, largely, an IGNORED issue.

To this day, the #1 issue seen in urgent care nationwide is URI (Upper Respiratory Infection) followed by Acute Bronchitis. BOTH entities are known to be caused predominantly by viruses and viruses alone. The rate of antibiotic prescribing at UCC’s nationwide for these conditions is, roughly, 70%. The number SHOULD be closer to ZERO (COPD, a few autoimmune disorders and some patients receiving certain MAB agents excluded, of course).

Someone getting an antibiotic for ANY reason is more likely to “require” treatment within a a year with another antibiotic for some other infection. Children given their first antibiotic before age 3 months have higher developmental disabilities, MOOD disorders, asthma, allergies, eczema, GI issues, autoimmune disorders, acne as adults and so on.

We NEED those bacteria to form hormone and neurotransmitter precursors.

But TRY, just TRY and convince doctors - and especially the freaking NURSE practitioners - NOT to prescribe an antibiotic for a URI and NOT to OVERPRESCRIBE (like 5 days of penicillin is as effective as TEN for acute streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis and cephalexin is more effective at eradicating the carrier state) is the topic of at least one journal article, letter to the editor, or editor’s page opinion nearly every month in every journal.

Acute LOWER UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) treatment is three days, or if the patient can tolerate it, SINGLE dose. NOT TEN of something like Omnicef or Cipro although I’ve seen that done more times than I can count in my 30+ years as a practicing physician, fifteen in ER/Urgent care, even within the past several years by Nurse Practitioners.

The BUSINESS model drives this craziness. “If we don’t prescribe they’ll just go down the street to another UC and we’ll lose a customer.” Also something I’ve heard TNTC.

But patients DEMAND their antibiotics. Even come in same day they started their “emergency Z-pak” for a REFILL rather than calling the malpracticing physician who prescribed the damned thing and I tell them NFW!

My favorite story was an 18 year old mom of a 1 year old with a HEAD COLD and she asked, then demanded I write a prescription for an antibiotic. I gave her some symptoms to watch for, explained viral URI as best I could (to yet another public education victim) , some instruction on saline and suction (but he doesn’t LIKE it” she whined) and then she said “But what do I do when I decide he NEEDS an antibiotic?”

I paused, and said as uninflected as possible, “why, then you do four years of an undergraduate pre-med program, take the MCAT, go to four years of medical school, a year of a rotating internship and 3 to 4 years of a residency in a specialty of your choice and you can prescribe ANYthing you think he might need but in the meantime, since I have that kind of training, and I DON’T think he needs an antibiotic right now, I am not going to write a prescription for him.”

The owner of the company gave me a rash of shit over that and HE, from his DESK, called in a prescription for the kid sight unseen for a head cold of 24 hours duration. His malpractice, not mine.

My kids, 32 and 29, have the HEALTHIEST immune systems of anyone I’ve ever met and neither of them received antibiotics for any reason except ONCE and for less than a week, while growing up. They’ve both traveled the world extensively (north and southern hemisphere, tropics too), yes, they had the majority of the normal childhood immunizations skipping HPV but getting the one for meningitis before college as well as the mRNA covid spike protein shot which I begged them not to but they’re still healthy.

Yes, we NEED exposures. Trillions (yes, trillions) of virions (virus) and fragments of RNA/DNA/immunogenic proteins RAIN DOWN on us on any given day while we’re outdoors. It’s another reason “outdoorsy types” tend to be healthier along with a good dose of natural vitamin D and exercise. People joining new office practices (business, law, medicine) tend to get a lot more “colds” their first year in the group as they’re exposed to other viruses their immune systems may not have seen for a while and some they did but immune memory is NOT forever. We can and do (there are studies) get RSV, Coronavirus and many other viral infections repeatedly over time.

It’s a common misperception, a canard, that once infected, “natural immunity” lasts for a lifetime.

If only.

I was interested in doing a fellowship in infectious disease at one time, the Army, and life, had other plans but I still read a lot.

[metmom]

I was born in 1955, well before widespread vaccinations.

However, I was not nursed.

Bottle fed thanks to better living through chemistry.

My eczema started when I was less than a year old. Allergies showed up later.

I often wonder how things may have been different if I had been nursed but again, there’s no going back in time and redoing everything to find out. So now I’m dealing with the results of that. It seems that it never gets better.

[metmom]

Thank you for an excellent post.

I wish more doctors had your wisdom.

[Deaf and Discerning]

Too bad it’s not captioned or sub-titled...

[NorthMountain]

I see that it’s from some shady outfit that has a vested interest in scaring people about vaccines.

As opposed, I suppose, to some shady outfit that has a vested interest in selling as many vaccines to as many people as possible.

The pharmaceutical industry and its government agency counterparts have destroyed their own credibility.

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented, CodeToad wrote:

Doing nothing also killed hundreds of millions of people, but let’s not talk about that while we bash vaccines without seeing the bigger picture.

I think the point being made is normally its only the positive side of vaccine reporting that is aired or deemed socially acceptable. The medical profession decides it doesn't want 'vaccine hesitancy' so it distorts the data reporting. This article attempts to balance the scales by reporting what has been suppressed.

Few people heard the recording of the father who called the pharmacist to ask about safety issues regarding the Covid19 vaccine, but everyone heard over and over 'safe and effective'. The father got the pharmacist to admit that she knew of the problem with myocarditis but didn't tell patients because she didn't want to fan 'vaccine hesitancy'. He becomes emotional when telling her his 7 year old son had myocarditis and the prognosis was poor. 

The problem is they PRETEND to tell us the truth, we trust them, and later find out they were lying. In the case of the child, the parents would balance the threat of Covid19 in children (quite small) to the threat of myocarditis before having their child vaxxed. At the same time, the medical regime lied to us about the effectiveness of both Ivermectin and HCQ. If parents were equipped with facts about the protective value of vitamin D3, the effectiveness of drugs like ivermectin, and the risks of the vax versus unvaxxed, they would then have the information they need.

SO much lying - we deserve the truth.

[exDemMom]

As opposed, I suppose, to some shady outfit that has a vested interest in selling as many vaccines to as many people as possible.

The pharmaceutical industry and its government agency counterparts have destroyed their own credibility.

Unlike professional antivaxxers (who are using antivax propaganda to sell snake oil), the pharmaceutical companies have to test their drugs in thousands of people and produce reams of safety and efficacy data in order to obtain FDA approval.

Pharmaceutical companies do not make much money on vaccines. They actually make more on people who get sick, since they need medications and, depending on how sick they are, IV fluids, other medical equipment. According to the CDC, a measles vaccine costs about $95. But, according to a 2020 review published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, the median cost of treatment for a case if measles is $32,805 (range, $7,396–$76,154). A Review of Measles Outbreak Cost Estimates From the United States in the Postelimination Era (2004–2017): Estimates by Perspective and Cost Type

Clearly, if big pharma was more interested in profit than in patient health, they would refuse to make any vaccine available.

[exDemMom]

I'm not trying to be rude or anything, but where did you find that fictitious version of what happens during an infection?

The circumstances are not the same.

That is correct. The circumstances of having an active pathogen growing and reproducing in the body are entirely different than being exposed to a tiny inert piece of pathogen.

Environmental exposure to a pathogen gets filtered, ameliorated and changed before the various components of the immune system even see it.

???

The reason pathogens are pathogens is that they have evolved mechanisms of avoiding the innate immune system. This is the part of the immune system that generally recognizes viruses, bacteria, fungi, etc. and acts against them. It eliminates most microorganisms without you ever knowing they entered your body. But pathogens can avoid it, that's how they make you sick.

Vaccines are administered in a number of different ways, often intramuscularly. In a natural infection, by the time the macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, dendritic cells, antibodies and a host of other proteins get exposure things are different.

Well, at least you have memorized some of the immune system components.

In a natural infection, your immune system is in a race against the pathogen. It takes about two weeks for the immune system to analyze the pathogen and develop specific antibodies to fight it. With some pathogens, like rhinovirus (causes colds), your body always wins the race (unless you have impaired immunity). With other pathogens, like the rabies species of rhabdovirus, your body will not win the race.

Think of an infection as siege on a fortress. The bad guys are bashing against the walls and lots of boiling oil(macrophages) have already been used and the messengers have gone out, the walls are under attack!

The vaccine is helicoptering in the bad guys right to the king’s chambers. Sure, the guards will show up and learn what to do, but the king may just decide the castle is lost and nuke it from orbit, just to be sure. We had to destroy the castle just to save it.

Very fanciful, but very much not what happens at all.

The vaccine teaches your immune system how to make antibodies against whatever pathogen the vaccine is designed to counter. It also teaches T-cells and B-cells to recognize the pathogen, but when we (scientists) are talking about protection against disease, we focus on the antibodies. This is because antibody activity is directly measurable.

A vaccine is NOT some kind of drug that sits around in your body just in case its pathogen shows up. It is NOT a shield or a weapon. It IS a training aid that teaches your immune system what to do if it encounters the real pathogen. The vaccine disappears within days of administration, but the antibody production goes on for months once initiated.

Not to mention the dosing. Dumping an adult sized Hep B vax into a toddler might just send the king on a permanent vacation(Autism).

I can't really predict the effects of administering an adult dose to a toddler, but I did find this article, Mix-Ups Between Doses of Children and Adult Vaccines which suggests that children need higher doses of vaccine to train their immune systems. So, if a child received an adult dose by mistake, they might not have an adequate immune response. The reason adults would need a smaller dose is that adults have likely already received the vaccine at some point, so that the vaccine isn't training from scratch, but simply giving the immune system a reminder that it should keep up the antibody production.

As for the autism claim, that has been debunked so many times that I am surprised that people still pull it out. Vaccines DO NOT travel through time to change the neurodevelopment genes in the ovum or sperm in such a way that the conceived child would develop autism. Vaccines don't affect genes anyway, even if they could travel through time. Vaccines have a place. Randomly dumping a bunch of novel appearing “pathogens” into immature immune systems probably needs to be re-thought out a bit.

[exDemMom]

Natural activity of the human immune system does not include adding Simian-40 DNA to the human body - but the pharmaceutical manufacturers have done that.

Do you have any reliable source that SV40 is being injected into the human body? By "reliable", I mean a source that is published within the medical literature, is catalogued in PubMed and is accepted as reliable by experts in various scientific disciplines?

First, an intact SV40 virus is not present at anywhere along the vaccine production process. The only part of the SV40 that is used is a tiny sequence of DNA whose only function is to signal to the RNA polymerases that here is the beginning of a gene that they need to transcribe (i.e. make an RNA copy). SV40 is widely used in molecular biology.

But what would happen if a tiny piece of SV40 promoter were to enter the human body? It would be destroyed almost immediately. Your body loves to destroy DNA. You have enzymes in your skin, your mucous membranes, your blood, etc., that exist for the sole purpose of destroying foreign DNA. Those DNA destroying enzymes are so prevalent and active that those of us who work with DNA are careful NEVER to touch any tubes, pipettes, etc., with our bare hands. Because we will destroy the DNA in our sample.

[exDemMom]

Makes the case that the MurdeRNA Jim Jones Jab is not a vaccine because it reprograms DNA and has the body generate spike proteins with no off switch.

Completely natural, immune system already does it... /sarc

Okay, let's pretend that I do not have a PhD in molecular biology and I actually understand NOTHING of how nucleic acids are made, function, and are destroyed in the body.

Now, please explain to me in technical terms exactly how RNA can "reprogram" DNA. I want to know how RNA which exists only outside of the nucleus forces its way into the nucleus where the DNA is. I want to know which human enzymes are involved in causing the RNA to interact with the DNA and to change the DNA sequence to match the RNA sequence. And then (bonus question), I want to know how this differs from when viruses inject RNA into your cells, taking them over and forcing them to produce nothing but virus RNA and proteins.

I'll need some references for your answers, as well. I have already described what a reliable reference is.

[NorthMountain]

the pharmaceutical companies have to test their drugs in thousands of people and produce reams of safety and efficacy data in order to obtain FDA approval.

BWAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahah!!!

Sorry, but that ship sailed with the fraudulent "pandemic" and the unsafe, ineffective "covid" "vaccine".

You just don't have any credibility any more.

[T.B. Yoits]

Okay, let's pretend that I do not have a PhD in molecular biology and I actually understand NOTHING of how nucleic acids are made, function, and are destroyed in the body... Now, please explain to me in technical terms exactly how RNA can "reprogram" DNA.

Don't take my word for it. Actual professionals have explained how RNA modifies DNA.
https://theconversation.com/rna-has-newly-identified-role-repairing-serious-dna-damage-to-maintain-the-genome-256429
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51457-9

We've known for DECADES that SV-40 modified human DNA, and yes, SV-40 was found in the Jim Jones Jab.

How about using "a single noncoding RNA for RNA-guided cleavage of double stranded DNA, exhibiting genome editing activity in human cells"?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41421-023-00615-2

You can hear another PhD, former MurdeRNA Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tal Zaks, proudly brag in a 2017 TED talk about what the company’s mRNA shot does.
https://archive.org/details/moderna-boss-m-rna-jabs-are-rewriting-your-bodies-software-genetic-code-we-call-

[cgbg]

“produce reams of safety and efficacy data in order to obtain FDA approval.”

Thanks for the laugh this evening.

[T.B. Yoits]

But what would happen if a tiny piece of SV40 promoter were to enter the human body? It would be destroyed almost immediately.

An outright bald-faced lie. Sick. Damn sick.

From 1998: "Simian virus 40 DNA has recently been detected in several rare human tumors, including ependymomas, osteosarcomas, and mesotheliomas."
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/187182

So much for "It would be destroyed almost immediately". So much for Pfizer or MurdeRNA claiming ignorance.

[T.B. Yoits]

https://kleanindustries.com/insights/market-analysis-reports/exclusive-health-canada-confirms-undisclosed-presence-dna-sequence-pfizer-shot/