Don't take my word for it. Actual professionals have explained how RNA modifies DNA.
https://theconversation.com/rna-has-newly-identified-role-repairing-serious-dna-damage-to-maintain-the-genome-256429
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51457-9
We've known for DECADES that SV-40 modified human DNA, and yes, SV-40 was found in the Jim Jones Jab.
How about using "a single noncoding RNA for RNA-guided cleavage of double stranded DNA, exhibiting genome editing activity in human cells"?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41421-023-00615-2
You can hear another PhD, former MurdeRNA Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tal Zaks, proudly brag in a 2017 TED talk about what the company’s mRNA shot does.
https://archive.org/details/moderna-boss-m-rna-jabs-are-rewriting-your-bodies-software-genetic-code-we-call-
Let me ask you: did you actually read the Nature article? Do you have the educational background to understand what it says, to the point where you can actually visualize the processes it describes and the various lab experiments performed? This paper is NOT a description of how RNA supposedly "reprograms" DNA (which RNA cannot do). Since the meaning of the word "reprogram" is vague the way you see it used in antivax literature, I will give a definition which I think is closest to anything meaningful. I will define it as "changing the nucleotide sequence of" which is a process that requires the use of a DNA template (containing the desired modified sequence) and a lot of enzymatic manipulation. RNA cannot do that. This Nature article describes the synthesis and use of homologous RNA (that is, RNA that has the same nucleotide sequence as the DNA). This RNA is made in the cell nucleus and is not even functionally or structurally similar to an exogenous virus mRNA.
We've known for DECADES that SV-40 modified human DNA, and yes, SV-40 was found in the Jim Jones Jab.
Who, exactly, has known this for decades? Is this something you found in antivax literature?
SV40 is a human pathogen. I can find no literature describing it as modifying genomic DNA. It exists in the cell separate from the genome, where the cellular nucleic acid modifying enzymes act on it just like they act on chromosomes. This is pretty much how every DNA virus works, and there are quite a few of them. The "goal" of viruses is to make more copies of themselves and infect more cells. Sometimes, they can hide in cells by disguising themselves as cellular DNA. (How do you think people get shingles or get a fatal measles infection years after the initial infection?)
The SV40 sequence used in the plasmid used for production of the spike mRNA is a promoter sequence. It contains no coding regions, meaning that it cannot direct the formation of any proteins that might be carcinogenic. A promoter is a short sequence of DNA that signals to the various RNA polymerase complex enzymes to assemble at that location and begin making mRNA. The promoter contains no coding regions. It is necessary for the expression of every gene.
How about using "a single noncoding RNA for RNA-guided cleavage of double stranded DNA, exhibiting genome editing activity in human cells"? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41421-023-00615-2
First, this is a letter to the editor, not a full research paper. Furthermore, it is talking about transposons. Transposons are DNA sequences that are extracted from the genome and inserted somewhere else in the genome. This letter discusses an RNA mediated cleavage of dsDNA during the transposon relocation process. "RNA mediated" means that the RNA acts as part of the transposon machinery, but does not mean that RNA has enzymatic activity, which is a prerequisite for the modification of DNA. The authors are describing their efforts to expand the tools available for genetic engineering. And this is getting very far afield from the discussion of how a vaccine stimulates the immune system.
You can hear another PhD, former MurdeRNA Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tal Zaks, proudly brag in a 2017 TED talk about what the company’s mRNA shot does. https://archive.org/details/moderna-boss-m-rna-jabs-are-rewriting-your-bodies-software-genetic-code-we-call-
I strongly suggest that instead of linking the TED talk, you actually listen to it for yourself. At no point does he claim that mRNA alters DNA. He talks about using viral mRNA to cause cells to temporarily make a viral protein that induces immune system activity. He talks about how cancers can develop because of mutated DNA which, in turn, causes the synthesis of mutated mRNA, which, in turn, causes the production of mutated proteins which drive the cancer process. He talks about the efforts to create an mRNA vaccine therapy which would alert the immune system to create antibodies and T-cells that would attack those cells with the mutated proteins. Finally, he talks about a genetic disease which is frequently lethal because children with that disease lack a crucial enzyme, and the efforts to inject those children with an mRNA encoding that enzyme. But at no point does he make the remarkable claim that RNA (of any sort) changes the genome.