Christ is the Passover Lamb
Christ is the Unleavened Bread of Sincerity and Truth
Christ is the First Fruits of Those Fallen Asleep
Satan and his Demons allowed in the Church have corrupted that plain First importance of the Gospel according to scriptures..
That is the best example of the 3 measures of leaven in the lump.
That is the best example of about 2,000 years of demon possessed unclean doctrines of demons
That is the best example of Demon birds allowed to nest in the Kingdom
A false Christ and a False Gospel professed by both the Mother of Harlots and Her Harlot daughters..
That has to end.
Christmas, January 1, February 2, Good false goddess Frigg Day, unholy Saturn Day, sun god day all need to end up in the Lake of Fire with the rest of the false doctrines of demons allowed to be peddled for any part of these last about 2,000 years the Ark, the Light, the Word left to go to Heaven.
Thank God it wasn’t about 3,000.
There is a hint that 3 measures of leaven were to be in the lump to make it all leavened.
Hopefully for the sake of the elect, He’ll cut time short.
The bible hints that He does.
Take a look at what offerings are required for the Feast of Weeks/Pentecost (aka the Birth of the Church)
Two LEAVENED Loaves
Christ is the UNLEAVENED Bread of Sincerity and Truth
2 Leavened loaves, Cronos.
That’s what the world has had while the Unleavened Bread of Sincerity and Truth is in Heaven.
The bible shows us the corrupted Kingdom on earth would be the opposite of Sincerity and Truth.
It eventually would morph into insincerity and falsehoods.
The parables may not be fully understood by the Church.
Maybe they read them and actually have no clue what they’re reading.
They don’t even have Paul’s first/Chief importance of the gospel Right.
Why should they have any Truth in them at all?
Welcome to about 2,000 years of Satan influence in the Garden, while the Tree of Life is in Heaven.
Your mileage will vary because your religion varies from mine..
You and I don’t have the same Jesus or the same Gospel.
I expect your religion to read the Bible differently than one who has been led out of Babylon.
“false Christ and a False Gospel professed by both the Mother of Harlots and Her Harlot daughters”
That would be people who follow dispensationalism and numerology as exposed in your posts.
“You and I don’t have the same Jesus or the same Gospel”
That’s because I have the Jesus in the Gispels as taught by the Apostles who learnt it from Christ God Himself.
You have numerology and 20th century Scooby doo philosophy.
No contest.
Your latest response is a chaotic, vitriolic rant that doubles down on dispensationalist distortions, slanders the Catholic Church as the “Mother of Harlots,” and accuses it of peddling “demon-possessed unclean doctrines” over a 2,000-year Church age corrupted by Satan. You weave a speculative web, linking the 2,000 cubits of Joshua 3:4, the 2,000 swine of Mark 5:13, and the “three measures of leaven” in Matthew 13:33 to paint the Church as a leavened, demonic failure, awaiting a literal Jewish millennium. Your attack on Catholic practices—Christmas, Marian devotion, even the liturgical calendar—is not just unbiblical but a grotesque caricature of the apostolic faith. This isn’t exegesis; it’s a dispensationalist fever dream, riddled with hermeneutical holes and exegetical errors. Below is a deeply Catholic, biblically grounded response that obliterates your claims, exposes the bankruptcy of your hermeneutics, and defends the Church’s truth with Scripture, Tradition, and reason, holding no punches as requested. Your accusations crumble under the light of Christ’s Word.
Let’s point out your theology’s holes:
1. Your Hermeneutics are not more than speculative Numerology, not exegesis
Your entire argument hinges on a fanciful numerological scheme—connecting the 2,000 cubits in Joshua 3:4, the 2,000 swine in Mark 5:13, and the “three measures of leaven” in Matthew 13:33 to a 2,000-year Church age corrupted by demons. This is not biblical exegesis but eisegesis, imposing a dispensationalist agenda onto unrelated texts. Let’s expose the holes:
- Joshua 3:4: You claim the 2,000 cubits distance from the Ark symbolizes 2,000 years of the Church age, separated from Christ (the “Ark in heaven”). This is pure speculation. Joshua 3:4’s context is practical: the distance ensured reverence and visibility as Israel crossed the Jordan. No New Testament text links this to a 2,000-year Church age. The Ark prefigures Christ’s presence (Hebrews 9:11–12), accessible now through the Church (Ephesians 2:18), not distant. Your numerology lacks any scriptural warrant.
- Mark 5:13: You equate the 2,000 demon-possessed swine with the Church age, calling it “demon-possessed unclean years.” This is a grotesque misreading. Mark 5:1–13 shows Jesus’ authority over evil, casting demons into swine, which drown, symbolizing their defeat (Mark 5:15). The number 2,000 is incidental, describing the herd, not a prophecy. No apostle or Father connects this to the Church. Your slander of Christ’s Church (Matthew 16:18) as demonic contradicts His promise: “The gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
- Matthew 13:33: You misinterpret the “three measures of leaven” as demonic corruption in the Church. In context, Jesus’ parable of the leaven depicts the Kingdom’s growth, permeating the world positively (Luke 13:20–21), like yeast in bread. Leaven is not inherently evil—Scripture uses it neutrally (Leviticus 23:17). Your negative spin is dispensationalist pessimism, assuming the Church’s failure, which contradicts Ephesians 5:27: Christ presents the Church “without spot or wrinkle.”
Your hermeneutic cherry-picks numbers, ignores context, and invents connections absent from Scripture. This isn’t exegesis—it’s fantasy, rooted in John Nelson Darby’s 19th-century dispensationalism, not the apostles’ teaching.
2. The Church Age: Christ’s Reign,
You portray the Church age as 2,000 years of “demon-possessed doctrines,” with Satan’s influence corrupting the gospel. This is a blasphemous attack on Christ’s Church, contradicting Scripture and the Holy Spirit’s guidance.
You deny Christ’s Victory: Revelation 20:2–3 says Satan is “bound” during the “thousand years,” which Catholics interpret as the Church age, where Christ’s resurrection limits Satan’s deception (John 12:31: “Now the ruler of this world will be cast out”). The gospel’s spread (Acts 1:8) fulfills this binding, despite Satan’s ongoing activity (1 Peter 5:8). Your claim of a demon-ruled Church denies Christ’s lordship (Ephesians 1:20–22: “He seated Him… above every name”).
You deny the Church’s Endurance: Jesus promises the Church’s invincibility (Matthew 16:18) and the Spirit’s guidance (John 16:13). Paul calls the Church “the pillar and bulwark of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15), not a leavened lump of demons. Your dispensationalist view, expecting a future Jewish kingdom, dismisses the Church as a failure, contradicting its role as Christ’s Bride (Ephesians 5:25–27).
You call the Church the “Mother of Harlots” (Revelation 17:5), a dispensationalist trope misapplied to Catholicism. In context, the “harlot” is apostate Jerusalem of 67 AD.
3. The Leaven and Pentecost: Your Misreading of Parables and Feasts
You claim the “three measures of leaven” (Matthew 13:33) and the “two leavened loaves” at Pentecost (Leviticus 23:17) prove the Church’s corruption, contrasting with Christ as the “Unleavened Bread of Sincerity and Truth” (1 Corinthians 5:8). This is exegetical malpractice.
Parable of the Leaven: Matthew 13:33’s leaven symbolizes the Kingdom’s transformative growth, not corruption. Jesus compares the Kingdom to yeast that leavens dough, spreading invisibly but powerfully (Luke 13:20–21). Your negative reading ignores the parable’s context, where the mustard seed (Matthew 13:31–32) also depicts growth, with “birds” (not demons) as nations resting in its branches (Ezekiel 17:23). The early Fathers, like Irenaeus (Against Heresies 5.9), saw leaven as the gospel’s spread, not demonic infiltration.
Pentecost’s Leavened Loaves: Leviticus 23:17’s two leavened loaves at the Feast of Weeks (Pentecost) represent the firstfruits of the harvest, offered to God. Leaven here is neutral, part of a prescribed offering, not a symbol of evil. You contrast this with Christ as “unleavened” (1 Corinthians 5:7–8), but the analogy fails—Pentecost’s loaves prefigure the Church, Jew and Gentile united (Acts 2:1–4), not corruption. Your claim that the Church is “insincerity and falsehoods” slanders the Spirit’s work (Acts 2:38).
Christ as Unleavened: 1 Corinthians 5:7–8 calls Christ our “Passover lamb” and urges believers to be “unleavened” in holiness. This doesn’t negate the Church’s mission but calls it to purity, which the Catholic Church upholds through sacraments and doctrine (CCC 1324). Your portrayal of the Church as leavened with demons defies Christ’s cleansing (Ephesians 5:26).
You rail against Christmas, January 1 (likely New Year’s or Mary’s Solemnity), February 2 (Candlemas), and days named after pagan gods (“Frigg Day,” “Saturn Day”), calling them “doctrines of demons” destined for the “Lake of Fire.”. This is sheer historical ignorance on your part
Christmas: Celebrating Christ’s birth (circa December 25) is rooted in early Christian tradition, possibly linked to the Annunciation’s dating (Luke 1:26–38). Sol invictus came AFTER Christian’s had started celebrating December 25.
Day Names: English weekdays (Friday, Saturday) derive from Norse and Roman mythology, but this is linguistic, not theological. Catholics don’t worship Frigg or Saturn by saying “Friday.” Your legalism echoes Colossians 2:16: “Let no one pass judgment on you in questions of… festivals or sabbaths.”
You accuse me of reading a “different Bible” and being “led into Babylon,” while slandering the Church as a harlot peddling demonic doctrines.
Prove your “doctrines of demons” charge—name one Catholic teaching that denies Christ’s gospel—or admit you’re bearing false witness (Exodus 20:16).