Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2025 3:51:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

NOAA can use those DEI satellites to do their job. Money well spent on their part. s/

BTW - There are over two dozen satellites that have been doing the job for decades.

I remember having to go to the rooftop in San Antonio and report current conditions every 15 minutes.


2 posted on 06/28/2025 3:59:13 PM PDT by Dacula (The good Lord has a sense of humor. He gets to laugh at me several times a day. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Since they still can’t tell you whether it’s going to rain tomorrow or not, this doesn’t sound like a big loss.


3 posted on 06/28/2025 3:59:35 PM PDT by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

We’ze all gonna die. NPR sez so.


4 posted on 06/28/2025 4:06:20 PM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Billions in equipment, radar, satellites, personnel, and they still screw up on a regular basis.


5 posted on 06/28/2025 4:07:53 PM PDT by Omnivore-Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

NOAA, which oversees the National Hurricane Center, says the loss of the Defense Department data will not lead to less-accurate hurricane forecasts this year. In a statement, NOAA communications director Kim Doster said, “NOAA’s data sources are fully capable of providing a complete suite of cutting-edge data and models that ensure the gold-standard weather forecasting the American people deserve.”


so .......................................

but from the headline we are all going to die.


6 posted on 06/28/2025 4:09:02 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

TV forecasters like Stephanie Abrams can keep people abreast of the weather out front of any developments.

https://www.google.com/search?q=images+stephanie+abrams&sca_esv=9240a35597657e9a&udm=2&biw=1052&bih=506&ei=a3ZgaPuGJLTgp84Pu_uN8AY&ved=0ahUKEwi76My3npWOAxU08MkDHbt9A24Q4dUDCBE&oq=im


7 posted on 06/28/2025 4:12:32 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
The ‘weather channel’ gods and goddess refuse to use the words ‘Gulf of America’..

There is no more a bunch of haughty progressive spouting climate change on the US airwaves ... That Jim Can’ttorrie and Stephanie Abrams along with the rest of the secondaries are stuck on stupid ...

They show a ‘google map’ with Gulf of America on their screen ... yet every last one of them refuse to say the words Gulf of America .... I wish we could literally ship every one of them to Mexico.... today!!!

8 posted on 06/28/2025 4:14:20 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Psalm 2. Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

It’s crucial! They won’t be able to forecast! (never mind that they have never been able to forecast before)


9 posted on 06/28/2025 4:17:37 PM PDT by webheart (Notice how I said all of that without any hyphens, and only complete words. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
There are other sources. I kep haring..."The European Model" as a second source.

AND....we're 40 years down the road...things have changed.

10 posted on 06/28/2025 4:20:42 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The European hurricane prognostications appear more accurate...


12 posted on 06/28/2025 4:23:01 PM PDT by Does so ("Trump said today, "I'm with Ukraine". You?.....🇺🇦...Dem☭¢rat... ∅ one ™ ¿ ¡ ☞≣ ½¼vedv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

NOAA, which oversees the National Hurricane Center, says the loss of the Defense Department data will not lead to less-accurate hurricane forecasts this year. In a statement, NOAA communications director Kim Doster said, “NOAA’s data sources are fully capable of providing a complete suite of cutting-edge data and models that ensure the gold-standard weather forecasting the American people deserve.”


IOW, much ado about nothing.


15 posted on 06/28/2025 4:55:28 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Looks like we’ll have to rely on weather rocks. They’re more reiable.


16 posted on 06/28/2025 5:02:40 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose GOD is the LORD. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Fleet Numeric is at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey. Curt Collins used to run the Oceanography Dept.


18 posted on 06/28/2025 6:12:23 PM PDT by sasquatch (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Here's an idea. NPR has radio stations all over the USA and Communist China. Ask the NPR stations to send a text message if the weather changes for the worse.

20 posted on 06/28/2025 6:43:06 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and His mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Taxpayer-funded information provided to weather forecasters whose work ends up weather websites with annoying ads?


21 posted on 06/28/2025 6:45:16 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Coincidentally there’s been a rash of unexplained weather-related phenomena lately — laser-like streaks across the sky, loud booming noises that aren’t thunder or sonic booms, etc. And they aren’t just anecdotal or blurry fotos on a cellphone. These phenomena have been observed (and recorded) via radar and satellite imagery. There’s some weird, obviously manmade stuff going on in the atmosphere lately, and too many amateur analysts are seeing it and — worse — sharing it. Could this be why the DoD wants to shut off access to its satellites?


24 posted on 06/28/2025 8:13:33 PM PDT by Blurb2350 (posted from my 1500-watt blow dryer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

There is still NOAA and no shortage of private satellites. They will be just fine. They probably just sold the Navy data to China anyway.


28 posted on 06/28/2025 10:57:49 PM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

This weather satellite fight between the USAF and NASA has been going on since the early 1960’s. NASA is given the lead on satellite development but never delivers so the USAF does it. It has only gotten worse since then.

What was a 1 meter cubed small and light satellite has become a 23 foot long 3 ton monster under NASA demands.


29 posted on 06/29/2025 2:59:20 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

NOAA should just ask SpaceX to use their Starlink sat bus since it’s in mass production already. It has laser links to neighboring birds too so no ground stations needed except one at homebase. Those huge phased arrays make for fine passive microwave radiometers and you could even do active SAR radar with them to see not only rain,hail,but also using backscatter water vapor content all with Doppler motion tracking. It wouldn’t be hard to tack on visible, IR and UV wideview and narrow view imagers on the edges of the bus folded down for stack and pack launch.

Falcon could yeet 26 at a time into polar orbit from vandy. Then use the ion thrusters to shift the orbits into a continuous train of them one after another you would get coverage every 3.5 minutes in a 90 minute orbital slot.

Send up 10 falcon 9 flocks you would have 260 birds in polar orbits that could see in real time the entire planets atmosphere pole to pole. SpaceX could get this done in 6 months from the go word.


33 posted on 06/29/2025 11:44:27 AM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson