Posted on 06/27/2025 5:50:24 AM PDT by Red Badger
Thanks for the link.
Grok affirms what Yo-Yo wrote (in less detail) -->
"The Concorde SST crypto scam refers to a fraudulent scheme involving a supposed stablecoin tied to a fake revival of the Concorde supersonic transport (SST) aircraft, falsely promoted as returning to service in January 2026. Scammers created a deceptive website posing as "Concorde Aviation," claiming to offer a stablecoin called Concorde Coin (CSSC) backed by aviation assets. The site, fly-concord.com, promised financial growth, stability, and eco-conscious travel through blockchain-based investments, leveraging the Concorde’s iconic name to lure investors. It included a registration form to collect personal information or funds, a common tactic in crypto scams to steal money or data.Posts on X, such as one from @DiarioBitcoin on June 26, 2025, warned about this scam, highlighting the fake website and its claims. The scam mimics common crypto fraud tactics, like impersonation and bait-and-switch schemes, where attractive but false promises lead to financial loss. No legitimate Concorde revival or associated cryptocurrency exists, and the scheme exploits the aircraft’s legacy to deceive investors. Always verify crypto projects through trusted sources and avoid sharing personal details on unverified platforms.
“Scam”
Again and again
I sent an email to the author to tell her it’s a scam and to pull the article.
Have not heard back as of yet...............
Perhaps it will be full of passengers leaving England and empty coming back. 😆
You know why those metal detectors in airports switched to those pod-like, full body scanners? Forget the starships- teleportation, and who knows how many are already in service? Expect a full sensory ride like at amusement parks where you’re in a room, just sitting in a chair. The Atomic Museum was a lot of fun for that, but not as much as the “Back to the Future” one. Not everyone would be down with teleporting, so saving av gas and not freaking people out is a plus, and I guess they figure, “don’t ask, don’t tell.” LOL. I have no proof of current deployment, but we sure have the tech.
Titan is a orbiting a gas giant, it’s methane is from the solar nebula it condensed at outer solar system temperatures.
Earth lost it’s primordial gasses during it’s 200+ year molten phase in it’s formation and the solar wind stripped all the original atmosphere away when the sun was younger and much higher solar winds.
Again no one anywhere EVER has presented to us the petroleum geologist community at any of our scientific community evidence of the affirmative for abiotic liquid hydrocarbons. Not at SEG,AAPG,GSA I am a research scientist member in good standing in all three societies.
And yes we do know how much technically recoverable oil is in place, every basin on earth has been surveyed, studied, and quantified. Your argument is just wrong, flat out wrong. Every oil every produced from any basin has at least 3 usually more absolutely conclusive evidence of biological origins. The carbon isotopic ratios, there is clear geochemistry markers that only occur in microbial plant life the list goes on.
As for decreasing production the Permian is already showing not only type curve declines due to the geopressure gradients drop via total hydrocarbon system depletion. Owen posted the production bible in another post it’s very telling about the overall health of that basin.
I have personally drilled well over a thousand Permian shale wells in a ten year period I can confirm with conclusive evidence that basin is in decline the geopressure is falling off and the type curves absolutely confirm this.
We need to as a species prepare for the inevitability of liquid hydrocarbons being too valuable to burn to the sky it’s not if it’s WHEN. We have a couple decades to bootstrap using those precious resources into a energy and chemicals system that will have access to a lot less liquid hydrocarbons and much higher orices.
Grrr autofill
Earth lost it’s primordial gasses during it’s 200+ million year molten phase in it’s formation and the solar wind stripped all the original atmosphere away when the sun was younger and much higher solar winds.
It should also be pointed out that titan does not have liquid hydrocarbons that would be liquid on earth at our pressure and temperatures.
Titan has methane it’s largest amount, then Ethane A byproduct of methane breakdown and a major component of Titan’s surface liquids. Both of these are only liquids because it’s 200 below zero on titan.
Acetylene,Ethylene, propane, diacetylene, methylacetylene, benzene. All in very small percentages. Every one of these form when high energy photons from cosmic rays hit methane in the atmosphere of Titan they didn’t form under ground and migrate up in titan. We can take methane on earth and hit it with high energy photons and get the same products.
None of these are proof of abiotic liquid hydrocarbons of the crude oil family. They are left overs from the gas nebula that was present when the solar system coalesced around massed via gravity. Earth’s share of these volatile gases methane specifically was lost because the earth was molten for millions of years before it’s crust cooled enough to be solid every bit of methane was out gassed and stripped by solar wind.
It’s fantasy and cope to point to a body in the deep cold outer solar system and say that’s why we will never run out. No the geological conditions are not even in the same league. The only evidence of mantle methane is near subduction zones where water ladder sediments are pulled down into the upper mantle and heated to the point where water cracks to H2 and O2 the H2 if it finds a carbonate also being cracked into CaO and CO2 can under limited conditions form CH4 the temp and pressure is so high that most of cracked to solid C and the H2 bonds with a silicate forming a hydrosilicate. There is no mechanisms to polymerize CH4 into CH2+CH2+n chains in fact the kinematics its exactly the opposite any of those chains would be instantly cracked to C and H2 at those temps. It’s easy to look at the C isotopes and spent carbon that was biological vs carbonate minerals any CH4 made from high temp carbonates have a distinctive C isotopes signature. Very little has been found the traps for it’s accumulation are not present up dip in the strata it is being formed in deep at the mantle interface. Some hydrothermal vents flow small amounts of deep chemical methane it is not something you can capture and use for fuel it’s in the ppt range and limited to few spots in the deep ocean floor.
Lots of Hindus in London too, and they don’t get along with Muslims.
If India and Pakistan do go to war with each other, it will spill onto the streets of London.
The only thing I learned from that article is that Exxon is not one of that guy’s clients.
Limited to them shouting at each other, like just happrnrd in the little India/Pakistan war couple months ago.
Fantasy and cope?
It's fantasy to say that we're burning dead dinosaurs and plant life. That body in "deep, cold outer solar system" is proof that the hydrocarbons are not from plant and animal life.
We're burning fuel that's continually created in our own core, not dead plant and animal life that oozed miles down into the ground and pooled.
LOL- could be- they might think that any price is worth it to leave lol
We’ve determined that this is an investment scam......
And it only takes a tiny little turd to spoil an entire bowl of punch.
Don’t be that tiny little turd on FR.
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.