There is no “what if” about it!
I wonder how it feels to be 30 years late to the obvious.
There are alot of scared little zombies that are going to have to find a new religion.
What if????
My kids would bring this crap home from school. I'd ask them how writing a check to the government fixes it, what does fixed look like (hint, it's never "fixed") and name a government entity decommissioned after its core goals were met.
If?
Just look at Canada - woke sh**hole that it is.
They just had imposed on them a globalist central banker as PM - a guy with 3 passports, didn't live in Canada for last 14 years, and a central banker in London, of all places
His most urgent policies (he even wrote a book on it) are Net-Zero, Carbon Credits, and CBDCs
Note that other EU/globalist bankers, like Draghi and Blackrock, want the same
Energy is the base of all wealth and money. Money is just a representation of expended energy we call "production." Debt is a claim on future energy.
Carbon control, net-zero, carbon credits, etc... are merely state-sponsored/banker control and counterfeiting of money at its source.
I would opine it was a good faith theory that was wrong, proved to be wrong, but immediately seized upon people who wanted money, power, and control, and is now a lie.
All of climate change is a false religion pushed on gullible fools with lies and false science to back it up.
What if? The whole climate issue is a scam to get control of energy stock piles and usage. Like all Psy-ops its based on something real. Pollution is bad. We would prefer not to have pollution. But CO2 is not pollution in most quantities. CO2 is made when anything dies. A leaf, an insect a person. Its made when something is eaten. Its consumed by every plant. Its a large part of every exhale. Its one of the most common molecules of life. The earth has both had much more CO2 in the atmosphere and far less. It gets trapped in Oil, coal, and gas. That CO2 had once been on the earths surface. And had once been part of a living being. If there is more in the atmosphere there will be more plants, more food, more land for humans and every other species. There will be more grass and more trees. To regulate CO2 is to regulate every person, business and country. Its a bad thing for the world. Every honest scientist who truly looks into the issue can see its a scam. When someone says differently they are selling their soul for grants or jobs, or they are too lazy to actually do the research themselves.
It’s garbage from Algore’s days changed slightly
Tell me something, folks. I am 41 years old. I attended grade school in the very early 1990s, and in those formative years, I seem to recall from general science classes where we were told that animals (including humans) produce CO2, and plants take in that CO2 to produce oxygen through photosynthesis that animals (and by extension, we human beings) need in turn. Thus it’s a cycle of us making what plants need and plants making what we need.
Is that some sort of Mandela effect memory that I’ve just made up or am I mistaken?
IF???
The last paragraph:
Maybe we’ve reached a Solzhenitsyn moment in which we know they’re lying, they know they’re lying, and they even know that we know they’re lying. And they still don’t care, because for them it’s all about raw political power and the acquisition of other people’s money.
It was always about money and control, and it’s a big fat lie.
... said Captain Obvious.
POPULAR SCIENCE, Feb 1980..
PS/What’s News ....
page 73
Changing the weather intentionally or otherwise weather modification..(Earth cooling vs Greenhouse effect)
“Do you suppose we can learn enough, soon enough, to pull off a balancing act with the CO2 blanket saving us from another ice age?”
...
AND WE DID IT! Stopped THE COMING ICE AGE in it’s tracks with CO2! With in TEN YEARS the new scare was GLO-BULL WARMING!
ping bttt
“What if the Foundation of the Climate Scare Was a Calculated Lie?”
What if allowing tens of millions of military aged males into the country for “humanitarian reasons” was a calculated lie?
1.) IF the left truly believed that CO2 was going to end all life on the planet, why don't they do the simplest experiments in their public schools to verify this "reality"? Put a plant of the same species in six different aquariums, each with its own CO2 level, all other inputs being the same (water, sunlight, etc). By the end of the semester, see which plants are doing best, and how horrible it is for those with elevated CO2 levels...
(Hint: every plant, flower, crop, tree, and grass... ALL of them... maximize growth and photosynthesis between 750 and 1500ppm CO2... the globe is around 422 at the moment, and growing at 1.8ppm/yr. The Left is running a terror campaign on children, so that we can AVOID slowly getting closer to IDEAL conditions for all plant life on earth...
If you doubt that fact about plants thriving at elevated levels, simply call ANY local greenhouse and ask if they elevate their CO2 levels in their buildings. The VAST majority do.
And CO2 does not affect mammals or bird until at least 5000ppm, by the way...
And the planet has had CO2 levels of 7000ppm during at least 2 eras in the last 700m years, and didn't become a wasteland.)
2. Why don't schools or studies look at ALL sources of CO2?
Because, if they did, they would find that the oceans contribute HUNDREDS times more CO2 than all human activity, combined.
3. Why don't they look at any other components in the atmosphere? If the share of CO2 is rising, then the share of something else must be declining.
Well... once you start looking at these numbers, you find that the percentage of OXYGEN is actually rising FAR faster than CO2... and oxygen is just as poisonous to humans if the percentage is too large... just ask anyone who has ever had basic SCUBA training.
4. What is the actual effect of raising temperature by 2 degrees? Why is 76 so much worse than 74?
The plants and animals preferred regions might slowly shift, but they have done that for all of existence. Less icy tundra means more arable land, and more livable space for humans and animals.
5. What direct actual evidence is there that the oceans are rising as a result of CO2 levels? Even assuming there is more than simply computer modeling, What is the real world effect of an incredibly slow rise?
Several world cities already exist below sea level. All that's lost is beachfront property, at worst... and that only impacts wealthy humans, it doesn't disturb the plants and animals and the planet.
But the fact that nobody is asking these questions says a LOT about the state of the scientific community these days.