Posted on 05/29/2025 7:42:42 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
A video compilation of physical assaults by black WNBA players against Indiana Fever star Caitlin Clark is going viral with more than ten million views.
The video shows Clark getting brutally body-checked, tripped, slapped, and elbowed over and over again on the court.
The video compilation of hits was reposted by a number of social media users, including actor James Woods, who felt that the video shows an obvious case of racism.
Many others have also chimed in:
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The claim that Clark committed a deliberate hard physical contact foul on Angel Reese is ridiculous.
(1) The video opens with a Black Indiana team mate of Caitlin Clark in perfect position to pull down a defensive rebound.
(2) Angel Reese pushes that Black Indiana player - from behind - so hard that the Indiana player almost falls down, about four feet out of bounds.
(3) A referee is staring straight at this flagrant blind side foul by Reese - but, the ref does NOT call the foul!
(4) Caitlin Clark instantly points at the foul and shouts at the referee.
(5) Angel Reese grabs the offensive rebound, then moves directly at the basket for a lay up.
(6) Caitlin Clark instantly moves in front of Reese and tries to the wrestle the ball away from Reese.
(7) The referee calls a foul on Caitlin Clark, and Clark immediately walks away from Reese.
(8) Reese briefly follows Clark, like she is going to fight Clark.
(9) Angel Reese should have been instantly ejected from the game for her violent, blind side, deliberate foul, on the Black Indiana player.
I think in two years Caitlin won’t be playing professional basketball...she’s going to be playing golf on the LPGA tour.
The ferals can stomp Harris voter Clark all they want for all I care.
I can make the call based on my opinion but won’t...considering where these blatant fouls come from. However, back in the day, there were no black hockey players...yet Bobby Orr took a lot of cheeap shots as a rookie. And everyone shrugged it off saying, “Ah, he’s a rook. He should expect it.”
Ali Villanueva, West Point grad and Afghan War vet.
I came across a statistic yesterday - sorry can't find it now - that Caitlin Clarke is responsible for something like 30% of all WNBA revenues, consisting of attendance and merchandising.
Clark is Biden dem. A self hating whiny white chick. Let the jig lesbians break her legs and end her career. Who cares?
Too bad she wasn’t an outspoken conservative like Riley Gaines, then I could really support her.
Theory: WNBA is the new WWE. The drama is designed to attract attention.
She’s not very smart. She should boycot. Tell everyone she’s boycotting because she’s the only reason anyone is watching. Then demand more $$$ or a share of the team. Also demand more $$$ from her shoe deal and cut a video on how to combat racism.... She should attack it head on....
Right. And a company’s value is based on its profit (plus assets minus liabilities), not its gross revenue. The WNBA doesn’t own anything tangible, so all its asset values are tied to profit-making portential.
So let’s say the WNBA’s revenues are 100 million, and its costs are 75 million. Now Clark is out and its revenue is only 70 million... that’s a way larger hit to its value than 30%. Basically, the WNBA is no longer assured to ever make a profit, so none of its assets will ever make a profit, so its assets quickly plunge in value towards zero... as soon as the market realizes the WNBA can’t ever make a profit.
Men play hard and get rough, drink together afterwards. Women hate women prettier or more talented than themselves.
I grew up in as rural a place as there is in the USA, had to drive 6 miles to get to a town of 40 people, surrounded by cattle and quarter horses.
I played baseball with about 50% white, 50% black and hispanic. It was common for them to make fun of a ‘cowboy’, while I’d call them ghetto. The PC police would have a heart attack sitting in on one of our drinking sessions!
I had a couple of them up to help haul hay bales and work some cattle, they told those stories about hanging out with those crazy cowboys for years. We had two calves that had been orphaned that were put on a dairy cow that escaped castration till he was about 450 pounds, convinced them we were going to throw him by hand and cut him. We ended up heading and heeling them and stretching him out, but they gave it a hell of a try.
Women are too jealous to let things go.
Human Males Appear More Prepared Than Females to Resolve Conflicts with Same-Sex Peers. - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12110-014-9198-z
Competitive behaviours might not be as direct in females as they are in males, but according to an older study, they’re also less likely to fizzle. The study found that women are less prepared than men to resolve their conflicts with same-sex peers.Of course, usually researchers, blame this on evolution, and imagine gender equality would solve it. Yet:
They tend to resort to non-obvious confrontations, and indirect aggressions, with “self-promotion” and “denigration of rivals” being commonly employed methods. Some other means are gossiping, downplaying rivals’ success, sabotaging, spreading negativity, boasting, shaming, criticising and discrediting in front of others.
Cross-cultural investigations confirm that compared to men, women experience more jealousy and distress about relatively more attractive same-sex rivals. - https://medium.com/@vinodhrajaraman/female-competitiveness-dynamics-is-it-more-than-men-68a0e0b4d28c
Evolutionary psychologists argue that many of the competitive behaviors we see in women today are remnants of these ancient survival strategies. For instance, the tendency to engage in indirect aggression – think gossip, social exclusion, or subtle put-downs – may have evolved as a way for females to compete for resources and mates without risking physical harm. It’s a fascinating perspective that sheds light on why female competition psychology often manifests in such covert ways.
But it’s not just our evolutionary heritage that influences rivalry among women. Biology plays a significant role too, with hormonal fluctuations contributing to competitive impulses. Estrogen and progesterone, the primary female sex hormones, don’t just regulate reproductive functions – they also influence mood, behavior, and social interactions. During certain phases of the menstrual cycle, some women may experience heightened feelings of competitiveness or sensitivity to social threats.
Interestingly, research has also suggested that there might be a genetic component to rivalry. Some studies have found that certain genetic variations are associated with increased competitive behavior in women. It’s as if nature has hardwired us with the potential for rivalry, leaving it up to our environment and experiences to determine how that potential manifests. - https://neurolaunch.com/female-rivalry-psychology/
Biblically, it is because the primary normative function of the women is that of being a wife and mother, for which she is uniquely fitted to do, and under male leadership overall.
If this continues it will kill the WNBA?
I had continued and it is already killing the WNBA. It is just a matter of time. We are all tired of this stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.