Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/29/2025 4:45:17 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

It seems that President Trump has the power under IEEPA, 39 to declare a national emergency on trade and to negotiate tariffs. Until Congress modifies the law I think the judges do not have a right to get involved in the tariff fight.


2 posted on 05/29/2025 4:45:28 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Amazing how restraint happens AFTER the Barry Biden regime practiced unrestrained for 12 years.


3 posted on 05/29/2025 4:59:38 AM PDT by Mlheureux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
For example, in Biden v. Nebraska, the Supreme Court held that President Biden did not have the authority under the Higher Education Act to engage in mass forgiveness of student loans;

The author conveniently leaves out that Biden did it anyway.

4 posted on 05/29/2025 5:03:52 AM PDT by MortMan (Charter member of AAAAA - American Association Against Alliteration Abuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Dems do whatever they please, but black robes tyrants rule when the People elect the candidate they choose. Somewhere a tree is thirsty.


6 posted on 05/29/2025 5:18:22 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Apparently, the Judicial Branch is sometimes superior to the Executive Branch and may (under certain circumstances) exercise restraint over the Executive Branch. But is this really true?

But when is the Executive Branch superior to the Judicial Branch? When is the President empowered to overrule the Supreme Court and say “Don’t listen to those guys. I’ll tell you how it’s gonna be ...”?

Co-equal branches means the Courts do their thing and the Executive does his thing and neither should have power to stop the other. If anyone has a problem, they can go to the Legislative Branch and say “Impeach this president” or “Impeach this judge”.

The real “Constitutional Crisis” happens when little judges start acting like they are the boss of the Executive Branch. They’re not.


7 posted on 05/29/2025 5:38:58 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

The way it is supposed to work.......the design.

The branches of government have NO authority over one another other than those specified in the Constitution.

The Courts have NO recourse against Congress or the Executive and their acts/omissions OTHER than their opinions.

The Courts can render an opinion at odds with actions of the Executive or legislation of the Congress......but the Executive is not compelled to obey such opinions.

The Courts have no recourse...even contempt is an empty threat without Marshalls to enforce the ruling.

If the Executive will not prosecute itself, then Congress can do one or several things.....IMPEACH-FUND-DEFUND.

The tyranny we suffocate under comes from too many lawyers making crap up over 200 years and coloring well outside the lines.

Just say no.

Whoever controls the guns, decides what any of it means.

You think otherwise, you are deluding yourself.


8 posted on 05/29/2025 5:39:56 AM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Mixed up usage here-

Our PDJT, The GOAT, gets pushed around by District courts, pushing National action. Trump follows the law and appeals.

The examples for Biden were from SCOTUS. The DRats just said screwel it and went ahead with their plans anyway.

These are not the same and destroy the premise of the entire article.


9 posted on 05/29/2025 5:46:53 AM PDT by Macoozie (Roll MAGA, roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

A federal judge will next declare pres Trump’s presidency illegitimate and demand that he step down.


10 posted on 05/29/2025 5:54:54 AM PDT by Bob434 (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Constitutionally it is Congress that stands in check to the president, not the courts, except for individual cases.

“High crimes and misdemeanors” include all the usual executive abuses, back hundreds and hundreds of years in the UK.


13 posted on 05/29/2025 6:08:11 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

The conservative think tanks try to be “politically neutral”.

The leftist think tanks dream up new ways to seize more power.


17 posted on 05/29/2025 6:14:44 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

A civil war is all we have left. Something has to be done about the evil DemonRATS and their anti-Semite terrorists with College Attendance Certificates. I saw this dizzy broad on TV the other day who is upset about Trump banning Harvard from dragging foreign trash into America through the far-left student visa clowns invasion. She was crying that her dream was to come to America, to go to Harvard, to graduate from Harvard, then to become a Harvard professor. Wow! We Americans are so lucky. Foreign freaks want to teach Harvard freaks.


18 posted on 05/29/2025 6:23:31 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Where can Americans go to seek justice now that the RATS own the judiciary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson