[MrRelevant]

He has plenty of plausible deniability. 86 can simply mean to remove.

[AndyJackson]

The deranged man and his coconspirators have been going after Trump since 2015. There is not innocent explanation. And this man may be an idiot but ignorance of the law is no excuse for a former FBI director and attorney.

[af_vet_1981]

He has plenty of plausible deniability. 86 can simply mean to remove.

Which can then be resolved by 86 Comey ?

But to where can he be removed so everyone is safe ?

[SMARTY]

His ‘statement’ and subsequent tone are wholly indefensible. The guy is a blue-ribbon clown

[Political Junkie Too]

Comey's plausible deniability weakens when, as the article points out, this is not the first time that Comey casually strolled across a politically messaged arrangement of seashells along his path.

-PJ

[juggernaut]

That’ll be a good question to ask him when he’s in custody.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

“He has plenty of plausible deniability.”

He just stumbled on the pebbles and thought “That’s a political message, but I don’t know what it means” and he took a photo and he posted it on social media and he deleted his social media account.

So, yeah. “Plausible”

[navymom1]

Normally yes as a private citizen who never worked in a field of law enforcement or held the highest rank in those field or prosecuted crimes who used the term to the fullest extent. Comey knew what he was doing. And everyone knews, he knows. He can claim to the contrary all he wants. There are memos, cases, emails, voicemails, texts, conversations recordings out there and you can bet people have been going through years of his BS since this broke.

The bigger question is what is the real goal? The death of Trump is obvious. What is the deeper goal and who is behind Comey? What has he been promised for this martyrdom? What’s Comey get in the end?

[Savage Beast]

I have never heard of "86" as a code for removing or assassination someone--or for anything else.

Is there a reference for this?

The evil, lying Democrats routinely invent false meanings for words and symbols. "_____ is code for _____."

Is this an invention, or does it truly have the meaning ascribed to it in this article and elsewhere?