Posted on 05/09/2025 5:36:52 AM PDT by dennisw
“”This is un-American to try to force or coerce someone to get tired and voluntarily sign the death penalty, technically … she faces a horrible, horrible fate if she goes back to wherever she came from.””
Then maybe don’t be a thief
Sounds like she already has several family members here.
“Just having a baby” sure didn’t keep her from committing a crime..
Get out. Take your children with you.
It seems as is she really got her tit caught in a wringer..:
Florida leads the Nation in cooperating with Federal law enforcement! All illegals encountered by Florida LEOs are held for ICE! Florida Highway Patrol Officers are authorized to exercise immigration enforcement by the Feds! Most PDs and Sheriffs do so as well in a less formal way.
this is how I read the headline...
Mom of US breastfeeding citizen (the baby) sues Kristi Noem after (the other breast) grabbed by ICE
It was true family separation and the Democrats rightfully received a lot of criticism.
After this incident, Democrats wanted unlimited migration into the United States.
Get out, you criminal! You are here illegally. Deport this loser...and her child(ren).
Oh boo freaking boo.🖕🏼
born...naturalized
past tense
The first sentence of AMENDMENT XIV is only retroactive as of the time of its adoption.
“from the text of the Constitution, it is clear”
“, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” is clear.
We don't need anymore stupid people in this country. We've got plenty of our own already as it is.
Send her home. This is what I voted for.
The first sentence of AMENDMENT XIV was not intended to change the law regarding citizenship.
It was only to make it crystal clear that the freed Afro-Americans were citizens as they would have been if there wasn’t racism.
AMENDMENT XIV, SECTION 1 was to make it crystal clear that the freed Afro-Americans were fully citizens and to be treated as such.
The due process requirement was also clearly extended to the states in furtherance of that.
Exactly.
Before she earned her citizenship, my wife was a lawful green card holder and we both knew the rules. "Do not under any circumstances break the law or you can be deported."
So, she didn't, --which was really difficult to do in the first place because my wife had no desire to steal stuff, or drive drunk, or engage in fraud, or whatever.
People who come over here illegally and then steal, WE DON'T WANT YOU HERE! GTFO!
Agreed—but it also made clear whom it didn’t apply to.
“’, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’ is clear”
There was a debate because the text was not clear. Senators made conflicting claims during the debate.
It is clear in context. Those ignoring that are trying to upend the country.
Amendments were to be for the purpose of fixing defects, not creating them.
Which is what this amendment did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.