|
Posted on 04/30/2025 9:00:22 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
. . .
You’re ok, it’s still there 😁
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.
J.R.R.Tolkien
Due Process for the preborn.
They should get at least 1 full year to appeal their executions.
SpyNavy
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Some people think this is a Deepfake.
LOL… look at that trans-lesbian bearded bouncer that came in at the end of that. Is there anyone working for the Derp State that isn’t a total freak show?
Shouldn’t every room be gun room ?
Okay...try this.😄
The 70’s🐕🎈🧨:
https://twitter.com/IndianaGPA/status/1924265821427114049?t=02J1viKnG7anGiV9BpLDdg&s=19
it was late... I forgot.
Removal is not deprivation of life, liberty or property.
The U.S. Supreme Court begs to differ, but I concede they are nowhere near the authority of the justices of the Supreme Court of Free Republic.
So sorry to hear that you believe U.S. federal law is commie globalist garbage.It is, it subordinates the US Constitution to international agreements that violate it. It’s unconstitutional.
So sorry to hear that you believe any United States federal law you disagree with is unconstitutional.
You left out the part where the treaty violates the Constitution. As the good old Constitution says, "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land...."
Fortunately, the treaty in this case was not self-executing and has zero compulsory effect beyond what federal law was adopted.
Paragraph (2) are exceptions of which no judicial review is allowed.
Paragraph 2 only lists exceptions to review of an AG determination. It has nothing to do with a judicial review of the observation of due process in reaching the determination.
But if you truly believe your brainfarts, do tell the administration or they may waste the next three and a half years litigating.
Only a brain dead liberal retard would make the argument that the founders were referring to illegal alien criminals who are invading the country when they wrote the Constitution.
Only an idiot would make believe I said any such thing. At the time the Constitution was adopted, right on through until after the 14th Amendment was adopted, there was no immigration control act. Immigration was openly solicited as there was loads of Indian territory to occupy and settlers were needed to occupy it.
Notably the Founders did not write the Constitution. The people who did that a decade or so later are called the Framers. And when they wrote the Fifth Amendment shortly after the original Constitution, they said "No person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." They were serious people who meant what they wrote.
Such is the retarded state of discourse today.
Just thinking how sad you’re going to be when we get our country back makes me smile.
Unlike the "NATO warrior under Reagan," I was on active duty from LBJ to Reagan. I even had four years on NATO staff and know that NATO positions are all staff positions. All combat troops and tanks, war planes and ships belong to the member nations of NATO and not to NATO. A NATO "warrior" is one who gets his finger stuck between two desks coming together.
I reckon you are just smiling because you are an idiot.
U.S. Constitution, Amendment 5, “No person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”Does the question then come down to this: Is the [direct] deportation of a criminal alien the equivalent of the death penalty [life]?
Neither that, nor any other point you reference, is relevant at this stage. Procedural due process is a constitutional requirement.
https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep344590/
Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U. S. 590, 597, 598 (1953).
Although it later may be established, as respondents contend, that petitioner can be expelled and deported, yet before his expulsion, he is entitled to notice of the nature of the charge and a hearing at least before an executive or administrative tribunal. Although Congress may prescribe conditions for his expulsion and deportation, not even Congress may expel him without allowing him a fair opportunity to be heard. For example, he is entitled to a fair chance to prove mistaken identity. At the present stage of the instant case, the issue is not one of exclusion, expulsion or deportation. It is one of legislative construction and of procedural due process.
https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2025/05/19/supreme-court-allows-trump-admin-to-revoke-amnesty-for-300k-venezuelans/
Wow. That will make all the difference.
The government is under order of the Supreme Court which states,
The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further notice of this Court. See 28 U.S.C. §1651(a).
A.A.R.P. et al v. Trump et al, U.S. Supreme Court, 24A1007, 4/19/2025, ORDER
That ORDER directs not to remove any member of the putative class from the United States for any reason whatever.
Are you going to tell us there are laws that say we have to feed these moochers and there is a law we have to give border jumpers shelter and clothes and a fucking cell phone too?
Is any of that shit required by any element of required due process? There is a very clear requirement for a hearing and an opportunity to be heard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
