Posted on 04/30/2025 9:00:22 PM PDT by ransomnote
The DMSO Handbook: A Practical Guide to its Uses and Applications
How to take DMSO Orally and Best Practices
When I first started using it I did smell kinda chemical (like garlic?) I don’t get the smell anymore.
The primary citation is the U.S. Constitution, Amendment 5, “No person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The process due is whatever the law provides.
From everything I’ve read, DMSO is better and safer at relieving pain and inflammation than Aspirin, Tylenol, Ibuprofen and many other OTC pain relievers and even steroids. Apparently the OTC pain relievers kill lots of people every year, while DMSO is much safer, comparatively, even at 3-30 X the therapeutic dose. Sounds a lot like IVM in both profile and demonization.
It may very well all come back to the indisputable leverage of Military Law, which by the grace of God, defends and protects the Constitution, and which, incidentally, by the grace of God, also preceded the Constitution.
Current military law in the United States is the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It was written by the gods in Congress.
House Resolution (H.R.) 4080, signed into law by President Truman on May 6, 1950, established the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Get lost, child.
The hall monitor has spoken.
Troll elsewhere.
When I first started using it I did smell kinda chemical (like garlic?) I don’t get the smell anymore.
_________________________________________
I hope to be that lucky. It wouldn’t be pleasant wandering the planet smelling like garlic, though I’ve heard that apples and maybe mint leaves can counteract the DMSO chemical reaction that results in the smell.
“Removal requires due process”False.
U.S. Constitution, Amendment 5, "No person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."
https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep345206/
Shaughnessy v. U.S., ex rel Mezei, 345 U. S. 206, 212 (1953)
It is true that aliens who have once passed through our gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness-encompassed in due process of law. The Japanese Immigrant Case, 189 U. S. 86, 100-101 (1903); Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U. S. 33, 49-50 (1950); Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U. S. 590, 598 (1953).
Your butt is not a source of law.
Pass this valuable information on to President Trump.
So sorry to hear that you believe U.S. federal law is commie globalist garbage.
and this:(3)Limitation on judicial review
No court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination of the Attorney General under paragraph (2).We just didn't and still don't seem to be following the law as written.
The AG must adhere to all the steps required by the law in reaching his determination. The subject must be informed of his right to obtain counsel, provide the subject with a list of persons (updated not less often than quarterly) who have indicated their availability to represent aliens in asylum proceedings on a pro bono basis, and have a hearing where the subject has an opportunity to be heard. The AG adherence to required process is subject to review by the courts. Any person detained in the United States is entitled to habeas corpus process.
I prefer to shake it like a Polaroid picture.
Somebody’s worried about who’s gonna mow their lawn this summer.
Or do their wet work...
. . .
Removal is not deprivation of life, liberty or property.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.