She did quarantine, and the new quarantine guideline was issued the day she arrived and she was going to be the first, she had returned from there and was an expert with Ebola herself, as your doctor described her, “no one has recognized the fact that she’s an EIS [Epidemic Intelligence Service] expert, she’s a CDC-trained fellow … one of the most well educated people you can get in public health and at the same time, she’s someone who’s committed her life to responding. So whether or not you agree with what she said, really what she stands for is all in line with sound public health principles.”
As you keep obsessing over this do you really agree with the statement that she “””went out of her way to try and spread it”””?
I’m not obsessed with that case. I was responding to another freeper. Then, when you posted to me, I started responding to your posts.
I never said she “went out of her way to try and spread it.” I said she refused to quarantine.
You and I are never going to see eye to eye on this case. But that’s okay. No one here agrees on everything.
I might have agreed with you, if I hadn’t been placed in isolation myself a few years before Ebola. As I posted earlier, I once was isolated while waiting for negative test results. One doctor said, “We know you don’t have [the illness],” but they were required to take precautions. I understood. I didn’t complain or start talking about my constitutional rights. That’s why I see the story differently.