Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va
central_va: "Lincoln aka Illinois Butcher, better not go to the play...."

According to John Wilkes Booth, it doesn't matter what Lincoln decides to do, or not do.
After hearing Lincoln's speech of April 11, 1865, supporting citizenship rights for freed slaves, Booth announced:

Lincoln can go or not, it doesn't matter.
According to Booth, Lincoln's support for freed slaves' citizenship rights signed Lincoln's own death sentence.
If not at Ford's Theater, then some other public event.
60 posted on 04/13/2025 8:57:15 AM PDT by BroJoeK (future DDG 134 -- we remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

“Our American Cousin”


61 posted on 04/13/2025 8:59:28 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK
After hearing Lincoln's speech of April 11, 1865, supporting citizenship rights for freed slaves,

Lincoln made it clear to the voters in 1860 that he never had any intention of doing that. See my quote from the Lincoln/Douglas debates up above.

I look at Lincoln cynically. You take everything he says as honest and true. You can't think of him as a conniving manipulative bastard, but I can. I can see him the way you see him, but I can also see an alternative version of him as an evil man.

The problem with him being a good man, is you shouldn't be able to find examples of him doing evil things.

Over the years I recall reading things about Lincoln that are not mainstream. Insights into his character that do not comport with him being a good man.

Back in the 1970s, I read a book about Lincoln, and in it was mentioned some of his shenanigans in rigging his election to the Illinois legislature. (bribing voters, getting them drunk, re-directing his opponents bribed/drunken voters into voting for him instead.) (Also there was quip from him where he remarked that a n***er boy's member was so long he could use it for a razor strop. This left me with the impression Lincoln could be vulgar.)

I no longer recall what the name of that book was, but it had fascinating details about Lincoln, and this was long before I ever thought to question what I had been told about the civil war.

The point is, I could see Lincoln as a man rather than a god. He wasn't perfect, and he could be profane.

This view allows me to see him relieving Captain Mercer of command and giving the ship to Lt Porter as a trick, not a mistake. (Not even the New York Times believed it was a "mistake". They thought it was a clever trick.) It allows me to see Lincoln going back on his word to voters in 1860 (about blacks voting) as a cynical ploy for power, and not a change of heart. It allows me to see the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed nobody under Union control, as a cynical ploy, not an honest belief.

If you look for examples of Lincoln pulling dirty tricks, you can find them. The way he rigged the election at the wig wam is another example.

If you cannot conceive of the man behaving badly, you will simply accept all the explanations for him doing these things as "innocent."

You can't see the real man. You can only see the myth.

65 posted on 04/13/2025 11:58:10 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson