This is the actual decision today.
The District Court has agreed with the administration's position that the plaintiffs in the Maryland case lack standing.
This is in accord with yesterday's Supreme Court ruling on a similar CA case.
Probationary employees may now be fired.
Again.
1 posted on
04/09/2025 10:44:33 AM PDT by
cgbg
To: cgbg
Probationary employees may now be fired.Probationary employees may now stay fired.
2 posted on
04/09/2025 10:46:07 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: cgbg
To: cgbg
It was not justiciable to begin with. The courts needs to be held accountable for their overreach and reigned in as to the limits of their constitutional authority under penalty of disbanding.
4 posted on
04/09/2025 10:49:48 AM PDT by
Skwor
To: cgbg
The District Circuit Court has agreed with the administration's position that the plaintiffs in the Maryland case lack standing. Fixed it to indicate that the appellate court agreed with the administration, overturning the district court.
-PJ
6 posted on
04/09/2025 10:58:04 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: cgbg
The Circuit Court judges decided they don’t want to be “Bench Slapped” by the U.S. Supreme Court like the District Court Judge.
8 posted on
04/09/2025 11:00:39 AM PDT by
WASCWatch
( WASC)
To: cgbg
This was a Reagan judge and a Trump judge agreeing with Trump, and one Biden judge dissenting. Looking at the composition of the court, Republican judges are outnumbered by Rat judges. I expect the panel's opinion to be overturned by the court en banc followed by an appeal by the administration to SCOTUS.
On the issue of standing, the dissent wrote:
"Next, as discussed in depth by the district court, the denial of this notice has, and will continue to, cause real harm with significant adverse effects. See Mem. Op. on prelim. inj. (D. ECF No. 125) at 10–16.3 Such adverse effects include, but are not limited to, an increase in unemployment benefits applications, an increase in the resources required to investigate this influx in unemployment benefits applications, additional financial and labor costs associated with the sudden strain placed on rapid response programs without advance notice, unanticipated loss of tax revenue, and the loss of support from federal employees who were working with various state agencies. See id. These harms, among others, plainly satisfy the concreteness requirement and thus provide the necessary grounds for Article III standing. See Dreher, 856 F.3d at 345."
The composition of this court pretty much guarantees that the dissent will be adopted by a majority of the court en banc/
9 posted on
04/09/2025 11:15:16 AM PDT by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: cgbg
Probationary employees may now be fired.
Now, just fire them, but don't make them sign saying it is for performance issues.
10 posted on
04/09/2025 11:18:49 AM PDT by
Mr.Unique
(My boss wants me to sign up for a 401K. No way I'm running that far! )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson