Posted on 04/08/2025 7:22:00 AM PDT by ShadowAce
I’m writing this article mainly for Windows users who’ve decided to switch to Linux. If you’re already a Linux user, chances are you’ve learned most of what I’m about to share—whether the easy way or the hard way.
The main goal of this article is simple: to help you figure out whether a “Linux for Windows users” really exists—and to bridge the gap between what you might expect and what you’re actually likely to experience.
Let’s start by taking a quick look at a niche group of Linux distributions that insistently want to look like Windows and then explain why that makes no sense.
So, you’ve decided to make the switch from Windows to Linux—first off, hats off to you! That’s a great move. By now, you’ve probably realized that Linux isn’t just one single thing like Windows. Instead, it comes in many different versions called distributions, or “distros” for short. These are all variations of what people generally just call “Linux.”
Now, if I wanted to sound super smart and technical (which I’m not—just a regular user who’s picked up some experience over the years), I’d point out that the term Linux technically refers only to the single component—the kernel—the core part of the operating system. But let’s not get too pedantic here. Since this is meant for folks just getting started, we’ll stick with the more common usage and just call it Linux. Deal?
Alright, let’s keep going. There’s a small (thankfully!) group of Linux distributions out there, since the days of Lindows (which later became Linspire)—a name I’m sure brings a nostalgic smile to the faces of longtime users, that have dedicated their existence to the idea to look and feel as much like Windows as possible. Some even try to achieve/mimic bits of its functionality—honestly, that’s not really doable.
These distros usually come with a clean and familiar user interface: a bottom panel with a list of open apps, a Start menu, and other elements that long-time Windows users will instantly recognize. Of course, there’s nothing wrong with that—in fact, it’s pretty cool.
However, the not-so-cool thing is that some of these projects go a little too far with flashy marketing claims (plus you’ve probably come across similar headlines online pretty often), trying to convince users they’re the perfect Windows replacement.
And here’s the truth, plain and simple: they’re not. Because here’s the big, I mean a really big, well-kept secret… ready for it? No, seriously—are you ready? Linux is not Windows! Never has been, never will be.
What I’m trying to say is that these Windows-like Linux distributions are basically selling you a “package”—one that plays on the anxiety you might feel about stepping outside your comfort zone when exploring something new (and amazing) like Linux. And honestly, that package—the look and feel—is not so hard to put together, even for an everyday home user.
Trust me when I say: the real beauty, flexibility, power, and freedom of Linux has never been about the packaging. It’s all about what’s under the hood and what you can do with it.
So, if you’re planning to switch from Windows to Linux, don’t make the mistake of choosing a distro just because it looks nice or looks like Windows. Seriously—don’t do it. Instead, I highly recommend following the advice in another article here: “New to Linux? Stick to These Rules When Picking a Distro.” It’ll help you make a smarter choice that you won’t regret.
Once again, there’s nothing inherently wrong with a Linux distribution trying to mimic Windows, though, in my opinion, it’s a bit sad. The real issue is that your expectations of getting something close to the Windows experience are almost guaranteed to fall short. Why that happens? Read the next chapter.
Linux and Windows are two separate universes. Sure, you can plug in a mouse and keyboard and connect either one to the internet—but that’s where the similarities end. From a technical standpoint, they’re built on fundamentally different foundations and are designed to work in very different ways.
Because of that, it’s just not realistic to expect the same experience on Linux that you had on Windows—and the same goes the other way around.
If we dig a little deeper, the philosophies behind the two operating systems couldn’t be more different. Windows is built around profit—it’s a commercial product. On the other hand, Linux belongs to a whole different world—one driven by core human values like freedom, choice, and the power of free will.
It’s no exaggeration to say also that most Windows users are just like that by coincidence. But it’s almost always a deliberate, thoughtful choice with Linux users. It’s something they’re genuinely passionate about, something that comes from both the heart and the mind.
Don’t believe me? Go ahead and talk to as many Windows users as you want and see how much “passion” you pick up in their words. Now, find the first Linux user you can think of and ask them why they use it. You’ll see exactly what I mean. But let’s put that aside and get back on topic.
As I mentioned earlier, the two operating systems are really different worlds. Even with the best intentions and a lot of effort from developers on both sides—and there are plenty of great examples of that—it’s nearly impossible to create a fully unified user experience. But the good news is, that’s never really been the goal for either side (aside from that specific category of Linux distributions we talked about earlier).
Switching from Windows to Linux is like stepping into a whole new world—and it’s important to understand that before you make the leap. If someone tells you that you’ll feel right at home on Linux just like you’re used to with Windows, that’s simply not true.
The biggest—and really the only—thing you need to make the switch successfully is a willingness to change your mindset. With that, you’re in for a fun and inspiring journey into the world of Linux. But if you’re just expecting a Windows-like experience, you’re setting yourself up for disappointment because Linux just works differently.
And that brings me to a conclusion I believe in with every fiber of my being: If you want a Windows-like experience, stay on Windows. If you want a better experience, switch to Linux. Saying ‘Linux for Windows users’ makes about as much sense as someone trying to raise alligators at the North Pole just because there’s water there. It completely misses the point.
Linux doesn’t need to be like Windows—and that’s actually one of the best things about it. It strips away the restrictions, giving you the freedom to tailor everything exactly to your needs and preferences. It’s fast, powerful, and free of all the unnecessary “goodies” you often find bundled with Windows. That’s a big part of what draws millions of people to it.
That said, there have always been (and probably always will be) Linux distributions aimed at attracting Windows users, built around the idea of “Linux for Windows users.” Good. But the moment you try to install something by double-clicking a file—just like you would on Windows—or, more interestingly, run into an issue that asks you to open the “scary” black Terminal window and type in a few mysterious commands, it hits you: that promise of being “just like Windows” wasn’t entirely true.
It’s also important to keep something in mind—Linux isn’t usually built to give you a perfect, polished user experience right out of the box. Instead, it’s about customizing the system to fit your needs and growing your understanding along the way. And trust me, you’re going to run into some challenges. But those moments? They’re turning points in your journey.
How you respond to them makes all the difference. You can either think, “Ugh, I give up—this just isn’t for me,” or you can lean in with, “Alright, let’s figure this out.” If you choose that second mindset, I promise you—a whole universe starts to open up. One filled with possibilities you probably never even knew existed. And the best part? Every piece of it is designed to serve you and stay fully under your control.
So, if you’re not just chasing a Windows clone and genuinely want Linux for what it is, it won’t take long before you start wondering how you ever lived without it. The Terminal becomes your best friend. Boot times are lightning-fast. You get unmatched control, power, a sense of freedom, simplicity, and speed that’s hard to beat. That’s the real beauty of Linux.
The idea that some people are trying to “promote” Linux by making it look and feel like Windows is honestly kind of disappointing. Linux was never meant to be like Windows, and that’s actually one of its best things.
Switch to Linux not because it might look like Windows in certain cases but because it truly puts you in control. It’s designed to work better and better for you over time because you’re at the center of the experience. You have all the power to decide what your system does and how it works—not the other way around.
You’re not just a passive user being told what you can or can’t do—you’re the one calling the shots, shaping your own experience. So forget about Linux for Windows users – no such thing exists. Just go ahead and choose Linux.
I hope it’s becoming clear that there is no such thing as “Linux for Windows users.” The main reason for that is the deep, foundational differences between how the two operating systems are built.
From the moment you boot them up, to how you install apps, manage settings, or even use your mouse and play audio or video—Windows and Linux do things differently. On a technical level, there’s simply no way for one to replicate how the other works fully.
Sure, there have been efforts in this direction. Windows users have had WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux) for years now, which gives them almost native Linux functionality right inside Windows. On the flip side, Linux users have long leaned on tools like Wine, which does a pretty solid job running Windows applications—games included—on Linux.
But at the end of the day, Windows and Linux are built on fundamentally different foundations. So, if you’re moving from Windows to Linux and want that transition to go well, it’s better not to focus on expecting to recreate the same experience.
Instead, think of it as stepping into a new world—one where things work differently, and often in ways that are more empowering and flexible for you as the user. That mindset shift can really make all the difference in having a smooth and successful transition.
Except that for some reason developers think a "Start menu" should be one of spaced out icons (looking at MS default especially) and lacking expanding menus which enable quick efficient access to the tools and places you want.
And lacking the ability to right click on an icon shortcut and quickly go to its location. Or send such shortcut to the "Send to" (buried in Windows) to add the list of locations or apps that you may want to send a file to. As well as so do with right click menus (composite).
And when you cannot enable two rows on the "task bar" (as per MS "update" removal, and most Linux distros).
Linux is not Windows! Never has been, never will be.
But it should not be averse to being like Windows if there it would provide a positive improvement. I have no found that Linux distros can now easily enable the customization I want and obtain in Windows, or that "equivalents" are all as good, but thank God for browsers and word pros that equally work on both. And that we can allow disagreement.
What I’m trying to say is that these Windows-like Linux distributions are basically selling you a “package”—one that plays on the anxiety you might feel about stepping outside your comfort zone when exploring something new (and amazing) like Linux...the real beauty, flexibility, power, and freedom of Linux has never been about the packaging. It’s all about what’s under the hood and what you can do with it.
Actually, as I have said before, you need to step outside a comfort zone to enhance Windows and enable it to be far more efficient and aesthetically improved, which I find can be more easily and safely freely done in Windows (even if it means reverting aspects of the W/11 shell to W/10*) which for me would take far more time to enable with Linux than is warranted. A least presently.
Linux isn’t usually built to give you a perfect, polished user experience right out of the box.
Neither is Windows, unless you are content with the defaults.
I hope it’s becoming clear that there is no such thing as “Linux for Windows users.”
But there could be, but which means improving both.
However, while I offer constructive criticism in the interest of making capable and beneficial systems better, as one in need of much improvement myself, I thank God for the tools we have, at little software cost (I only paid $28 for an upgrade to W/8, on the Retail channel, which led to W/11 Pro via free upgrades), which I want to use for what is good in the eyes of God.
My old home built PC runs Mint daily, while an old donates PC rdult boots W/10 with PC Linux OS (KDE plasma) which I found to be the best distro myself, though it has seen little use by me, and I do not employ proprietary codecs TMK.
Thank God for options.
*https://www.quora.com/Why-should-Windows-be-loved-over-Linux/answer
"Win 7 to Vista"
“Any “Windows” people that went FROM Win7 TO Vista has some serious mental issues...”
Yeah, I agree. I was able to stretch out Win 7 through that mess. But when Win 10 came out I used it one time and saw the writing on the wall, this was just going to get worse. So I didn’t even care if I had to learn a whole new language like DOS and go back to a Command prompt environment, or even just quit computing altogether I was done with MS forever. Enter Linux Mint... Full GUI and all. Never looked back... The few little quirks and adjustments have all been absolutely worth it to be rid of that MS ball and chain. You don’t own MS, MS owns you...
"Except run software that is only supported on Windows."
"And there it is... There is always “that one game” no one can live without no matter how bad windows gets."
"with floppy disks. (This sets the era for the story.)"
BTW, no idea where the “80s Hit Songs” bookmark came from. It has been exterminated!
I liked it, back in the day, when the only computer users were the command line interface.
Only experienced people could use them, so very few screw-ups.
When Windows came out, I made a face palm because I knew that the era of errors was coming; Point and click.
Users see, “Are you sure?”, and click “Yes” without even knowing what they were clicking.
Now, they are calling me because they “accidentally” formatted their HD, or some-such. (That was back then)
The thing is, and point I was trying to make, is how folks will put up with enslavement and so much abuse from MS rather than just retire that “one game” and learn to play a new one similar on Linux. It is illogical and irrational to me...
I had a few MS games I liked when I switched to Linux. But the minimal sacrifice was absolutely priceless to be rid of MS for good. Never missed them at all because MS no longer owned me anymore. Small stuff in the bigger picture. Very small sacrifice for such huge benefits...
I was fortunate to dodge the user support role. Instead, I had a network of 80 UNIX machines supporting a user community of 30,000 users that were on in shifts 24x7. I was constantly looking for ways to make processing more efficient to avoid having to pony up $250k for another machine. I found ways to do distributed processing over that set of machines...after getting Ethernet installed on all of them. My HP-UX box could knock out about 5k transactions per second with the 80 boxes underneath. That was 1986.
One of my later co-workers was stuck supporting a county office as Windows support. He got a call almost every morning from the same woman..."It don't print. Make it print". Each morning the same defect repaired the prior morning reappeared. After 3 iterations, he dug into the logs and found a "corporate" maintenance server was overwriting the fixes during the night. Uggh! He tracked that down and the problem was resolved.
Only with OS software. Windows OWNS the non-computer technical world. I am an analytical chemist (PhD). If I run a mass spectrometer, gas chromatograph, liquid chromatograph or any other hard-core analysis instrumentation, the software for those instruments runs on Windows, and only on Windows (and quite possibly on only a specific windows version).
Would that it were not so...
Of course there is the specialty stuff. But even at that Linux is now taking over all that specialty stuff. Robotics, Automation, Smart Devices, things that require or operate on firmware, etc. I bet that if you dug deep enough Linux software just might be available to replace a lot of that specialty stuff. Because that is actually where Linux is exploding in the market. Scientific and medical devices... It is lightweight and extremely reliable.
https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=linux%20for%20mass%20spectrometer%3F
I hope it happens...
Fortunately, I am retired and no longer need to fight it. The wife (also PhD Chem) is still working and requires Windows for her job (and for whom I am “tech support”...which is the sole reason I run Windows). Once she retires, Windows is gone!
Yep, I get it... :)
I know it is probably too late in the game for your wife now at this point but check that link, they are already doing it. That top one is a “live” version where you just plug in an external storage device with the software and it takes over and runs the whole shebang over the top of whatever OS the device uses. So Linux to run those devices is already here. :)
But why wait for your personal stuff? MS is going to make sure there are a whole bunch of very cheap good used laptops out there very soon because they are going to force everyone to buy newer computers to even run MS. Perfect timing and opportunity to set up a separate Linux box... :)
A geek who can’t imagine priorities and choices beyond those of a geek.
I already have Linux Mint running on a Dell laptop that I occasionally fiddle with. Got lazy in retirement....
The hardest part of getting that machine up was finding a wifi dongle driver that both the Dell and Linux recognized.
But that is done.
Oh good! Well that is a start! :)
And I don’t care what anyone tells you, stick with the Mint. I have tried every most popular Distro out there and have settled on Mint as the best. :)
The solution to this is for MS (or M$ as my old Java open source buddies liked to say) to commercialize desktop Linux. This seems unlikely but not impossible given some of their other changes over the last few years. I don’t mean WSL. I mean a Linux without Windows. Or, a combined monster that makes it easier to use WSL with a UI right out of Windows. Wouldn’t need much memory, would it haha.
MS, or someone, if another company rises to challenge MS in the part of the market desktop Windows dominates. Which I don’t see. I spit in Apple’s general direction.
One problem is that there’s little demand. It would be a subscription-free release, but then the poor dumb users have to support it themselves.
I would like to see better integration for WSL and every possible usage of the command line and running services on the machine. I need to try the Warp terminal soon.
+1
And one reason some people do not switch is because their network of support contacts only know MS Windows - not Linux.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.