Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon’s Acting Inspector General Launches Probe Into SignalGate
American Greatness ^ | 3 Apr, 2025 | Debra Heine

Posted on 04/04/2025 6:06:52 AM PDT by MtnClimber

The Pentagon’s Acting Inspector General announced Thursday that he is reviewing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of an encrypted messaging app to discuss a military strike against Houthi militants in Yemen, last month.

Although the March 15 military operation was executed flawlessly, fallout over what has been dubbed “SignalGate” has continued unabated, fueled largely by Democrats in Congress who have been agitating tirelessly for Hegseth to step down.

On March 25, left-wing lawfare group American Oversight filed a lawsuit against Hegseth and the other Trump officials who were in the chat, alleging that they violated record retention laws. That case is being handled by none other than U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee and key Russia hoax player, who last month ordered the Trump administration to immediate stop deporting illegal gang members to El Salvador.

Meanwhile, Axios reported on Thursday that several members of Trump’s National Security Council were fired after MAGA activist and influencer Laura Loomer “visited the Oval Office and pressed Trump to fire specific NSC staffers.”

Now Acting Inspector General Steven Stebbins is investigating whether Hegseth and other defense officials violated department policy by using the app, according to the Associated Press.

“The objective of this evaluation is to determine the extent to which the Secretary of Defense and other DoD personnel complied with DoD policies and procedures for the use of a commercial messaging application for official business. Additionally, we will review compliance with classification and records retention requirements,” the acting inspector general, Steven Stebbins, said in a notification letter to Hegseth.

In his testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee last month, CIA Director John Ratcliffe said the use of Signal among intelligence officials was permissible, routine, and preceded the current administration.

The IG investigation, launched at the request of Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and ranking member Sen. Jack Reed (R.I), will reportedly take place in Washington, D.C. and at the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) Headquarters in Tampa, Florida.

The Inspector General’s Office requests two points of contact from the Secretary of Defense for the duration of the investigation, a Government employee who is knowledgeable of the subject, and General/Flag Officer who is familiar with the subject and can act as point of engagement with the DoD Office of Inspector General.

The “SignalGate” controversy erupted when Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was somehow included in a Signal group chat discussing plans about the attack on Houthis in Yemen. Goldberg publicized the chat in the Atlantic, withholding details purportedly over national security concerns.

After multiple Trump officials denied that any “classified materials” or “war plans” were discussed, the Atlantic published the entire group chat, showing that Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth had posted the “exact times American aircraft were taking off for Yemen” 31 minutes before the first warplanes launched.

Hegseth hit back with a statement on March 26, saying: “So, let me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so-called “war plans” and those ‘plans’ include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information. Those are some really shitty war plans. This only proves one thing: Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an “attack plan” (as he now calls it). Not even close.”

The Defense Sec. added: “As I type this, my team and I are traveling the INDOPACOM region, meeting w/ Commanders (the guys who make REAL “war plans”) and talking to troops. We will continue to do our job, while the media does what it does best: peddle hoaxes.”


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: deepstate

1 posted on 04/04/2025 6:06:52 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Funny that it was the Biden Administration that pushed for the use of Signal. Were they ever investigated for it.


2 posted on 04/04/2025 6:07:05 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Acting Inspector General?
Not much job security in that.
3 posted on 04/04/2025 6:09:53 AM PDT by ComputerGuy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

They need to justify their existence since they have failed to catch multi billions of dollars of fraud, waste and abuse.


4 posted on 04/04/2025 6:10:17 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
whether Hegseth and other defense officials violated department policy

Sounds like another IG needs to be put on a leash and asked to do his job looking for waste and fraud. Using Signal was Biden admin policy, No 1. Number 2, the only policy that Hegseth can be held accountable for is violating Turmp's policies. Otherwise he is the embodiment of DOD policy.

Just another example of bureaucrats running the government trying to leash the President and his team.

5 posted on 04/04/2025 6:11:52 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
On March 25, left-wing lawfare group American Oversight filed a lawsuit against Hegseth and the other Trump officials who were in the chat, alleging that they violated record retention laws.

And just what would be their standing for such a case? Sheesh.

Now Acting Inspector General Steven Stebbins is investigating whether Hegseth and other defense officials violated department policy by using the app, according to the Associated Press.

Fire that dumbass.

6 posted on 04/04/2025 6:12:09 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

still not fully convinced it was accidentally seeing that the houti move was flawlessly effected while the jawboning of the asinine CONgresscritters chewing on this is so damned comical.


7 posted on 04/04/2025 6:12:31 AM PDT by Qwapisking ("The left will rue the day they cheated Trump out of the 2020 election forever" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
More deepstaters rebelling against the elected president of the US. Rumor his that Trump just fired the Commander of US Cybercommand. Sounds like another general needs to go.

All these generals getting fired, I am going to start crying - tears of joy.

8 posted on 04/04/2025 6:13:52 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Probes, hearings and investigations.

More probes, hearings and investigations.

Even more probes, hearings and investigations.

Yet another barrage of probes, hearings and investigations.

Do we EVER tire of probes, hearings and investigations? Nah, it’s cheap entertainment.


9 posted on 04/04/2025 6:15:46 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (PDJT doesn’t just walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death. He swaggers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

And after that he will reopen an investigation into Hillary destroying thousands of secret documents on an unsecured server ... Riiiiiight!


10 posted on 04/04/2025 6:28:54 AM PDT by antidemoncrat ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
A few years ago the crypto (secure comm) field was eliminated in the US Air Force.

It became part of the computer field.

I don't know if this happened in the other services.

If there were still real crypto people running the communications it is doubtful that Signal would have been used and Goldberg couldn't have been included as all members of the call would have to have been in secure locations.

When the field was dropped, I figured it was only a matter of time before something like this happened.

Just because something is encrypted doesn't mean it is secure, you still have humans involved, few of which really understand real secure communications.

11 posted on 04/04/2025 6:30:59 AM PDT by Mogger ( 7th generation Vermonter, refugee in New Hampshire hoping NH remains sane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mogger

That is why skilled staff working for senior officials is critical.

It is their job to understand communications security issues.


12 posted on 04/04/2025 6:42:23 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

BTTT


13 posted on 04/04/2025 6:43:50 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Why are Republican Senators requesting the IG investigate this?


14 posted on 04/04/2025 6:57:28 AM PDT by Help!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“Now Acting Inspector General Steven Stebbins is investigating whether Hegseth and other defense officials violated department policy by using the app, according to the Associated Press.”

The Secdef SETS department policy.


15 posted on 04/04/2025 7:03:16 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

So the gov’t comes in & installs Signal on everybody’s phone & then the gov’t comes in & investigates its use? Huh?


16 posted on 04/04/2025 7:14:58 AM PDT by Twotone ( What's the difference between a politician & a flying pig? The letter "F.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
The Secdef SETS department policy.

Correct. SecDef is the approving authority, second only the President, to communicate and store classified information.

The real scandal is who leaked the Signal Chat to the Atlantic. Only a fool would accept at face value that this Goldberg character was included by accident. If he was really included, the IG should look at options to prosecute him for listening in on a private conversation, and then publishing its contents.

17 posted on 04/04/2025 7:29:14 AM PDT by LuxAerterna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LuxAerterna

“Only a fool would accept at face value that this Goldberg character was included by accident.”

I’m with you. How did Goldberg get in on that chat?

Maybe other posters are saying that classified chats need to be set up by experts, not just the participants.


18 posted on 04/04/2025 7:55:05 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson