Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

There shall be gender neutral standards for roles - capacity to carry heavy loads, endurance, speed etc.
"All entry-level and sustained physical fitness requirements within combat arms positions must be sex-neutral, based solely on the operational demands of the occupation and the readiness needed to confront any adversary," Hegseth said.

1 posted on 04/02/2025 8:42:45 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

In Biden’s military they could just identify as physically fit but it started far earlier. I got out out in 90 and worked DoD for 28 years after that... It went down hill very fast and started with don’t ask don’t tell.

It’ll be a huge cleanup.


2 posted on 04/03/2025 4:06:45 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

I am curious of what the standards will become. Equal standards does not necessarily equate to the proper standards. Women have always had a different standard.

In the U.S. Army Basic Airborne Course (BAC), the pull-up requirement is replaced by the flexed arm hang (FAH) for both men and women. This test ensures that participants can safely perform parachute-related tasks. Here’s a breakdown:

The standards are the same for both genders in this specific test. However, other physical fitness requirements, like push-ups, sit-ups, and running, differ based on gender and age.

Conceptually, if one can conduct required physical task at the lower numbers that person is fit enough to carry three days of water, ration, ammunition, extra mortar rounds, and crew served weapon ammunition and be ready to fight. Able to get into a hand to hand fight using an e-tool against all comers. If that is true there is no reason to make a physical standard more stringent than the current female standard.

Not a slam on women but logic.


4 posted on 04/03/2025 5:33:06 AM PDT by timza ( “Character, in the long run, is the decisive factor in the life of an individual" T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Yesterday at Costco, I saw a couple of black young Sergeants who were each at least 50 pounds overweight.


5 posted on 04/03/2025 6:15:00 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Islam’s Strategy is Effective: Out-breed and murder everyone else. What to do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

This is why they’ve got a fatwa out on Pete.


6 posted on 04/03/2025 6:17:03 AM PDT by OKSooner (Oh, the mad fools!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
The secretary noted that in establishing new sex-neutral standards for combat arms roles, no existing standards can be lowered.

Why not? No one runs two miles in tennis shoes in combat. That should be dropped to maybe a mile. Or, make a 5-7k ruck the last event instead of a two-mile
7 posted on 04/03/2025 6:17:06 AM PDT by Svartalfiar (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

As women fail the standards they will just lower the standards.


8 posted on 04/03/2025 6:21:12 AM PDT by CodeToad ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson